Asexual Reproduction of Plants

Last updated: June 07, 2026EspañolРусский

One of the fundamental properties of living organisms, along with metabolism, growth, and development, is the ability to reproduce. Reproduction is the property of producing offspring similar to oneself, ensuring the continuity and succession of life across generations (Yakovlev et al., 2005). Thanks to reproduction, biological species exist in space and time, and life on Earth persists through geological epochs.

In the plant kingdom, two main forms of reproduction are realized: asexual and sexual. The fundamental difference between them lies in the involvement of specialized sex cells (gametes) and the process of their fusion (fertilization). Sexual reproduction is always associated with the formation of gametes, their fusion, and the formation of a zygote — a cell carrying combined genetic information from two parent individuals (Graham et al., 2014). Asexual reproduction, on the contrary, occurs without the involvement of a sexual process and without the formation of gametes. In this case, new organisms arise from non-reproductive (somatic) cells or specialized cells — spores that develop without fusion (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Graham et al., 2014).

Thus, Asexual reproduction of plants is a form of reproduction in which a new individual is formed from one or more somatic cells of the parent organism or from specialized non-reproductive cells (spores), without the fusion of gametes, as a result of which the offspring inherit genetic material from only one parent.

A key feature of asexual reproduction is the involvement of only one parent. A consequence of this is the genetic identity (clonal nature) of all daughter individuals relative to the mother, provided no mutations occur (Mozet, 2017). The set of individuals arising from one parent individual through asexual reproduction is called a clone (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Bidabadi and Jain, 2020).

Asexual reproduction is widespread in the plant world. It occurs in both lower plants (algae) and higher plants — from mosses to flowering plants. Moreover, many species are capable of reproducing both asexually and sexually, which gives them significant evolutionary and ecological advantages (Graham et al., 2014; Hörandl, 2024). Understanding the essence, mechanisms, and significance of asexual reproduction is a necessary foundation for studying botany, as well as for solving practical problems in agronomy, plant breeding, and biotechnology.

In the following sections, we will examine in detail the biological significance, classification, mechanisms, and applied aspects of asexual reproduction in plants.

1. Biological and Evolutionary Significance

To understand the role of asexual reproduction in plant life and evolution, it is necessary to compare its advantages and disadvantages relative to sexual reproduction. Both forms of reproduction ensure the production of offspring similar to themselves, but they do so with different strategic consequences for the species (Graham et al., 2014; Mozet, 2017).

1.1. Advantages of Asexual Reproduction

Asexual reproduction provides plants with several significant evolutionary and ecological benefits:

  1. Speed and efficiency. Asexual reproduction requires no expenditure of time or resources on flower formation, attracting pollinators, producing large amounts of pollen, or finding a partner. Under favorable conditions, the process can be continuous and rapid (Graham et al., 2014). This allows a species to quickly colonize territory and increase in number.

  2. Resource economy. Aga mous reproductive structures (e.g., thallus fragments, brood buds, tubers) often require fewer plastic substances than complex flowers and seeds (Mozet, 2017).

  3. Guaranteed reproduction. Even a single isolated plant (e.g., on an island or in a new environment) can produce offspring. This explains the success of many adventive (introduced) species that spread exclusively vegetatively, such as Canadian waterweed (Elodea canadensis) in European waters (Yakovlev et al., 2005).

  4. Preservation of successful genotypes. Since the offspring inherit the genetic material of a single parent, all individuals of the clone possess an equally high fitness to the environmental conditions in which that parent was successful. If the environment is stable and homogeneous, cloning offers an undeniable advantage (Graham et al., 2014; Mozet, 2017). An example is the vast clones of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) covering entire mountain slopes: all trees in such a grove are parts of a single giant organism (Mozet, 2017).

These advantages are realized in different forms of asexual reproduction: from simple division of unicellular algae to specialized spore production in mosses and ferns, as well as vegetative reproduction using stolons, tubers, bulbs, and brood buds in flowering plants (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Meng et al., 2026).

1.2. Disadvantages and Evolutionary Constraints

The flip side of the genetic uniformity of clones is their vulnerability:

  1. Lack of recombination. During asexual reproduction, there is no exchange of genetic material between different individuals. As a result, new combinations of alleles are not created in the offspring, limiting genetic variability — the raw material for natural selection (Graham et al., 2014; Hörandl, 2024).

  2. Accumulation of harmful mutations. Since selection is less effective in agamous lines, they may gradually accumulate mildly deleterious mutations (the so-called Muller’s ratchet). Without ‘purification’ through recombination, this leads to gradual genome degradation and may cause the extinction of long-term exclusively asexual lines (Hörandl, 2024; Graham et al., 2014).

  3. High vulnerability to pathogens and environmental changes. If conditions change (a new pathogen appears, drought occurs, climate changes), the entire clone may die because all individuals have the same sensitivity spectrum. In contrast, a genetically diverse sexual population is more likely to contain genotypes resistant to the new stressor (Graham et al., 2014; Mozet, 2017).

1.3. Evolutionary Significance: A Balance of Strategies

Evolutionarily, sexual reproduction is the dominant strategy in higher plants, and for good reason. Meiosis and recombination ensure effective removal of harmful mutations and create the variability necessary for adaptation to changing conditions (Hörandl, 2024). However, asexual reproduction is not a complete ‘evolutionary dead end’. It allows a successful genotype arising from a rare sexual event or mutation to be ‘fixed’ and rapidly multiplied. This is why facultative agamospermy — the ability of plants to reproduce both sexually and asexually depending on circumstances — is widespread in nature (Graham et al., 2014; Bidabadi and Jain, 2020).

This is particularly evident in many weeds, rosette perennials, and species living in extreme high-mountain and Arctic environments, where the short growing season limits the possibilities of sexual reproduction. Moreover, many crops are propagated exclusively vegetatively by humans to preserve valuable varietal traits (Mozet, 2017; Carmel et al., 2024).

Thus, the biological and evolutionary significance of asexual reproduction lies in its serving as an effective tool for the rapid reproduction and dispersal of genetically stable clones well adapted to local conditions. Combined with periodic sexual reproduction, this gives plants unique flexibility: they can both fix successful genotypes and create new genetic diversity for survival in a changing world.

2. Key Concept: Clone

To understand the biology of asexual reproduction and its practical use in agronomy, it is necessary to introduce the fundamental concept of the clone. This term has precise meaning in both population biology and plant breeding and biotechnology.

2.1. Definition of a Clone

Clone (from Greek <span lang="el">klon</span> — branch, shoot) is a group of genetically identical individuals originating from one original parent individual through asexual (vegetative or agamous) reproduction (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Bidabadi and Jain, 2020). In other words, all members of the clone are exact genetic copies (replicas) of the progenitor, provided no spontaneous mutations occurred during cell division.

It is important to emphasize that a clone can form both in nature (e.g., an aspen grove, a lily-of-the-valley patch, strawberry runners) and artificially — as a result of vegetative propagation of cultivated plants (cuttings, grafting, microclonal propagation) (Graham et al., 2014; Mozet, 2017).

2.2. Mechanisms of Genetic Identity

The genetic uniformity of a clone is explained by the fact that during asexual reproduction, all cell divisions leading to the formation of new individuals occur exclusively through mitosis. Mitosis ensures accurate copying of chromosomes and their equal distribution between daughter cells, guaranteeing the preservation of the original genotype (Graham et al., 2014). In contrast, during sexual reproduction, meiosis and recombination occur, leading to the formation of genetically unique zygotes.

In some cases, plants can produce seeds without fertilization (apomixis). The resulting embryos are also clones of the mother plant, although they develop inside the seed (Hörandl, 2024). Such apomictic clones are widespread in many flowering plants, for example in bluegrass (Poa spp.), hawkweed (Hieracium), and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) (Graham et al., 2014).

2.3. Scale of Clones in Nature and Agriculture

The size of clones can vary from a few individuals to giant clonal colonies covering vast areas. A classic example is quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), where individual clones can cover tens of hectares and include thousands of trunks connected by a common root system. One such clone in Utah (USA) covers more than 40 hectares and weighs an estimated 6,000 tonnes (Mozet, 2017). Similarly, tufted grasses and many perennials (e.g., lily of the valley) form dense clumps that represent clones.

In agriculture, the concept of a clone is of enormous practical importance. Cultivated varieties propagated vegetatively (potato, Jerusalem artichoke, garlic, many fruit and berry crops) are essentially clones. For example, all potato plants of the variety ‘Nevsky’ in the world are the vegetative offspring (clone) of a single original plant selected by the breeder (Mozet, 2017). This ensures uniformity of the crop in morphological and economically valuable traits.

2.4. Why is the Concept of a Clone Important for an Agronomist?

An agronomist and plant grower must consider the properties of clones in practical work:

  1. Preservation of varietal traits. During clonal propagation, all useful traits (yield, taste, disease resistance, fruit size) remain stable across generations, in contrast to seed offspring, which segregate (Graham et al., 2014; Carmel et al., 2024).

  2. Uniformity of production. Plantings of clones (e.g., apple orchard, vineyard) yield highly uniform produce, which is critically important for industrial cultivation and processing.

  3. Monoculture risks. The downside of clonality is genetic uniformity, which makes the entire variety vulnerable to new races of pathogens or unfavorable environmental factors. This is why the Irish potato famine of 1845–1849 occurred, when late blight destroyed almost the entire clone of the variety ‘Lumper’ cultivated in Ireland (Graham et al., 2014). Modern breeding aims to create not one but several resistant clone-varieties of each crop, reducing epidemiological risk.

  4. Foundation for biotechnology. In vitro microclonal propagation methods are based on obtaining thousands of genetically identical plants from a single meristem. This allows rapid multiplication of elite genotypes, sanitizing planting material from viruses, and conserving rare species (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Meng et al., 2026).

Thus, the concept of a clone serves as a link between the fundamental biology of asexual reproduction and the applied tasks of crop production, seed production, and biotechnology. Understanding the clonal nature of vegetatively propagated varieties enables the proper planning of breeding programs and plant protection systems.

In the next section, we will examine the classification of different types of asexual reproduction — from sporulation to specialized forms of vegetative reproduction.

3. Classification of Asexual Reproduction Types

Schematic diagram of the life cycle of angiosperms

Schematic diagram of the life cycle of angiosperms

A clear diagram showing the alternation of generations (sporophyte → meiospores → gametophyte → gametes → fertilization → zygote → sporophyte).

All the diversity of forms of asexual reproduction in plants can be reduced to two fundamentally different categories, which differ in the origin of reproductive structures, their cellular composition, and biological role (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Graham et al., 2014; Mozet, 2017):

  1. Asexual reproduction proper (spore reproduction) — carried out by specialized unicellular primordia — spores, which are formed in special organs (sporangia).

  2. Vegetative reproduction — carried out by parts of the plant’s vegetative body (shoots, roots, leaves) or their modifications.

Note. Due to its enormous practical importance in agronomy, vegetative reproduction is covered in a separate article on our portal. Here we will consider it only within the framework of the general classification of asexual reproduction to maintain a coherent picture.

3.1. Asexual (Spore) Reproduction Proper

Life cycle of a fern

Life cycle of a fern

Illustration detailing the alternation of gametophyte (prothallus) and sporophyte in ferns, including sporangia, spores, antheridia, archegonia, and zygote.

This type is characteristic of many algae, fungi (which were previously classified as plants), and for all spore-bearing higher plants — mosses, clubmosses, horsetails, and ferns (Raven et al., 2022; Yakovlev et al., 2005).

Spore is a microscopic, usually unicellular reproductive unit that serves for asexual reproduction and dispersal. In aquatic and many terrestrial plants (e.g., ferns), spores can be motile — zoospores, equipped with flagella (Raven et al., 2022; Graham et al., 2014). Spores of terrestrial plants are generally immotile (aplanospores), have a thick, desiccation-resistant wall made of sporopollenin, and are dispersed by wind or water (Mozet, 2017; Stern et al., 2020).

Spores are formed inside special structures — sporangia (or on specialized hyphae — conidiophores in fungi). A key biological feature is that in all higher plants, spores are formed as a result of meiosis, i.e., they are haploid. From them, not an adult sporophyte plant (as in flowering plants from a seed) germinates, but an asexual generation — the gametophyte (prothallus), which then produces gametes (Stern et al., 2020; Graham et al., 2014). For spore-bearing plants, asexual reproduction by spores serves not only to increase the number of individuals but also for dispersal to new territories. For example, a single fern can produce millions of spores, which the wind carries over vast distances (Mozet, 2017).

Since this article is oriented toward agricultural disciplines and avoids deep systematics, we will not examine in detail the types of sporangia and sporulation mechanisms in different taxa. We will only note that in heterosporous plants (some clubmosses, aquatic ferns, and all seed plants), two types of spores are formed: microspores (small, giving rise to the male gametophyte) and megaspores (large, giving rise to the female gametophyte) (Raven et al., 2022; Yakovlev et al., 2005).

3.2. Vegetative Reproduction

In contrast to spore reproduction, vegetative reproduction does not involve the formation of specialized unicellular spores. A new individual arises from a multicellular fragment of the mother plant — a part of a shoot, root, leaf, or from their modified structures (bulbs, tubers, rhizomes, stolons, brood buds) (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Mozet, 2017). This process is based on the ability of plants to regenerate — to restore a whole organism from its part.

By the origin of the organs involved in vegetative reproduction, we distinguish:

  • Natural vegetative reproduction, occurring in nature without human intervention. This includes the spreading of rhizomes (couch grass, lily of the valley), formation of stolons (strawberry), brood buds (bryophyllum, zantedeschia), tubers (potato), and bulbs (tulip, onion) (Graham et al., 2014; Stern et al., 2020). Some species, such as Canadian waterweed in Europe, reproduce exclusively vegetatively — by shoot fragmentation (Yakovlev et al., 2005).

  • Artificial vegetative reproduction, used by humans in crop production, forestry, and horticulture. The main techniques: cuttings (stem, leaf, root cuttings), layering, division of the bush, grafting, and in vitro microclonal propagation (Carmel et al., 2024; Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Mozet, 2017). These methods allow obtaining a huge amount of genetically uniform planting material (clones) while preserving all economically valuable traits of the variety.

3.3. Difference Between the Two Types: Why is it Important?

For agricultural education, it is fundamentally important to distinguish between spore and vegetative reproduction because:

  • Spore reproduction is a mechanism for dispersal and alternation of generations in wild spore-bearing plants. It is practically not used in agricultural practice, except perhaps for growing some ferns as ornamental crops.

  • Vegetative reproduction is the basis of modern industrial horticulture, viticulture, potato growing, and ornamental floriculture. It ensures the preservation of varietal purity and rapid turnover of planting material.

In the next section, we will examine the morpho-anatomical foundations and mechanisms underlying asexual reproduction — from cell dedifferentiation to organ and embryoid formation.

4. Morpho-anatomical Foundations and Mechanisms

To understand how a whole new plant organism forms from one or several somatic cells, it is necessary to turn to the cellular and tissue processes underlying asexual reproduction. Although the end results (spore, thallus fragment, brood bud) can be very different, the basic mechanisms share common features related to the phenomena of dedifferentiation, callus formation, and subsequent meristem reorganization (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Yakovlev et al., 2005).

4.1. Dedifferentiation and Totipotency

A key property of plant cells enabling asexual reproduction is their totipotency — the ability of any living somatic cell (under certain conditions) to realize the entire genetic program embedded in it and give rise to a whole organism (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Mozet, 2017). In a normally developing plant, cells specialize (differentiate), but they retain the full set of genes and the potential to return to an embryonic state.

The transition of a differentiated cell to a state capable of dividing is called dedifferentiation (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Bidabadi and Jain, 2020). During this process, the cell loses specialization traits (e.g., chloroplasts reduce to proplastids, the large vacuole fragments), the cytoplasm becomes denser, and the nucleus is activated. The trigger for dedifferentiation is most often injury (cut, separation of a plant part) or exposure to certain external factors (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Graham et al., 2014).

4.2. Callus as a Form of Unorganized Growth

In many cases (e.g., during cutting, wounding, or in vitro cultivation), dedifferentiated cells begin to divide actively, forming a mass of unorganized parenchymatous cells called callus (from Latin callus — callosity) (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Yakovlev et al., 2005). Callus is essentially a wound tissue in which cells are in a meristematic state and can differentiate into various tissues and organs.

Callus can form both on the cut surface (e.g., in root crops or cuttings) and deep within tissues. Under natural conditions, callus often gives rise to adventitious roots or shoots. In biotechnology, callus cultures are used as a source of cells for microclonal propagation, somatic embryogenesis, and genetic transformation (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Meng et al., 2026).

4.3. Main Pathways of Regeneration: Organogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis

Morphology of tobacco regeneration

Morphology of different stages of organogenesis in tobacco (<span lang="la" class="biological-name">Nicotiana rustica</span>) _in vitro_

A — root regeneration from callus tissue; B — callus with shoots; C — embryoids; D — compact callus; E — shoot regeneration; F — shoot clusters on friable callus. Scale not indicated.

From dedifferentiated cells (callus or individual cells of specialized tissues), further development can proceed along two main pathways: organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis.

Organogenesis

Organogenesis is the process of forming new organs (shoots, roots, leaves) from meristematic cells of the callus or directly from explant tissues (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Stern et al., 2020). Development can be either direct (adventitious buds or roots arise directly on the cut) or indirect (through the callus stage).

A key role in directing organogenesis is played by the balance of endogenous and exogenous phytohormones. As early as the 1950s, it was shown that a high ratio of auxins to cytokinins stimulates rhizogenesis (root formation), whereas a high ratio of cytokinins to auxins induces shoot formation (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Mozet, 2017). This principle underlies all technologies of microcutting and clonal propagation in vitro.

At the molecular level, regulatory genes such as WUSCHEL (WUS), SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM), ARR and WOX gene families are involved. For example, activation of the WUS gene in callus cells at elevated cytokinin levels triggers shoot meristem formation (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Meng et al., 2026).

Somatic Embryogenesis

Somatic embryogenesis is the process of forming from somatic (non-reproductive) cells structures that are morphologically and physiologically similar to zygotic embryos (embryoids), which then germinate into whole plants (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Yakovlev et al., 2005).

This mechanism is particularly pronounced in some species in nature (e.g., embryo formation on leaves in bryophyllum (Kalanchoë)) and is widely used in biotechnology for mass propagation. Unlike organogenesis, where an organ develops from a multicellular primordium, somatic embryos often arise from a single cell (e.g., from a single callus cell). They pass through characteristic developmental stages (globular, heart-shaped, torpedo-shaped), have polarity (apical and basal poles), and can be used to produce ‘artificial seeds’ (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020).

Induction of somatic embryogenesis often requires stress treatment (osmotic shock, high concentration of 2,4-D auxin, wounding) and is associated with the expression of specific genes such as LEAFY COTYLEDON (LEC1, LEC2), BABY BOOM (BBM), and SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE (SERK) (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Meng et al., 2026). In many species, somatic embryogenesis is possible only in vitro, but in some (like kalanchoe) it occurs spontaneously on leaves, which is associated with the loss of repressor genes and a specific epigenetic state (Meng et al., 2026).

4.4. Brief Role of Phytohormones

Without delving into physiology, it is necessary to note that all the processes described are under hormonal control. The main classes of phytohormones involved in inducing cell division, dedifferentiation, and organogenesis are:

  • Auxins (IAA, NAA, 2,4-D) stimulate callus cell division, root formation (rhizogenesis), and the induction of somatic embryogenesis (at high concentrations).

  • Cytokinins (kinetin, BAP, zeatin) induce cell division, bud break, and shoot formation.

  • Gibberellins can stimulate the germination of somatic embryos and the growth of regenerants.

The balance of auxin and cytokinin concentrations in the culture medium or locally in tissues is a key factor determining the morphogenetic pathway (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Stern et al., 2020).

In the next section, we will examine the external and internal factors affecting the success of asexual reproduction, as well as the conditions necessary for regeneration.

5. Factors and Conditions for Occurrence

The success of asexual reproduction — whether it be spore formation in ferns or rooting of an apple cutting — depends on a complex of external (abiotic and biotic) and internal (physiological) factors. Understanding these conditions is crucial both for explaining natural patterns and for developing effective agrotechnical methods for vegetative propagation of cultivated plants (Hartmann et al., 2002; Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Carmel et al., 2024).

5.1. Abiotic Factors

Abiotic factors are non-living components of the environment that affect plant growth, development, and regenerative capacity.

Humidity and Water Regime

Water is a critical factor for most forms of asexual reproduction:

  • Spore reproduction. In algae and many fungi, zoospores and gametes can only move in an aquatic environment. In terrestrial spore-bearing plants (mosses, ferns), spores germinate only in a moist substrate. Furthermore, fertilization (which follows spore germination in these groups) also requires the presence of liquid water, through which sperm swim to the egg (Raven et al., 2022; Stern et al., 2020).

  • Vegetative reproduction. During cutting propagation, high air humidity (up to 90–100%) in the period before rooting is necessary to prevent desiccation of the cutting, which does not yet have roots and cannot compensate for water loss. To create such humidity, misting systems, plastic film, or glass are used (Hartmann et al., 2002). Substrate moisture is also important: excessive waterlogging leads to rot, while deficiency leads to drying of the cut site (Carmel et al., 2024).

Temperature

The processes of dedifferentiation, callus cell division, and formation of adventitious roots or shoots are possible only within a certain temperature range. The optimal temperature for rooting most cuttings from temperate zones is +20…+25 °C (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020). Too low temperatures inhibit cell division and wound healing, while high temperatures (above +30 °C) can cause enzyme denaturation and tissue death. Some species (e.g., subtropical and tropical) require higher temperatures. Additionally, stratification (cold treatment) of some brood buds can stimulate their germination (Hartmann et al., 2002).

Light

The role of light is ambiguous and depends on the stage of the process:

  • Spore formation. In ferns and mosses, light is often necessary for sporangium induction and spore maturation. However, spore germination in some species occurs better in the dark (Raven et al., 2022).

  • Vegetative reproduction. During callus formation and root initiation, many species prefer darkness or diffused light, as light can inhibit cell division and promote photo-oxidation of auxins (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Carmel et al., 2024). However, after shoot emergence, good lighting is necessary for photosynthesis and normal growth of regenerants. In in vitro culture, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with specific spectra (red and blue) are used to optimize photoautotrophic growth and reduce hyperhydricity (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020).

  • Photoperiod. In some plants, seasonal day length changes regulate the transition to bulb, tuber, and stolon formation. For example, tuber formation in potato is induced by short days (Yakovlev et al., 2005; Graham et al., 2014).

Substrate and Mineral Nutrition

Rooting cuttings and callus growth require an aerated, moisture-retentive, and sterile (or near-sterile) substrate. Traditionally, mixtures of peat, perlite, vermiculite, and sand are used (Carmel et al., 2024). In in vitro culture, agar-solidified nutrient media containing macro- and microelements (the most well-known is Murashige and Skoog medium — MS), as well as a carbohydrate source (usually sucrose), are used because callus and immature regenerants are not fully photoautotrophic (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Mozet, 2017).

5.2. Biotic Factors

Biotic factors include influences from living organisms, including pathogens and symbionts.

Pathogens. Bacterial, fungal, or viral infection is one of the main causes of failure in cutting propagation and microclonal propagation. Infected tissues rot, and regeneration does not occur. Therefore, in vegetative propagation, healthy mother stock is used, substrate and tools are sterilized, and fungicides and antibiotics are applied (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Carmel et al., 2024).

Symbionts. In some species, the presence of mycorrhizal fungi can positively affect the rooting of microshoots and their subsequent development, but this factor is usually not considered in standard vegetative propagation protocols (Raven et al., 2022).

5.3. Internal Factors (Physiological State of the Donor Plant)

The success of asexual reproduction depends to a great extent on the condition of the donor plant from which explants (cuttings, leaves, root fragments) are taken (Hartmann et al., 2002).

Age of the donor plant. Tissues of juvenile (young) plants have a significantly higher regeneration capacity than tissues of adult plants that have transitioned to flowering. Juvenile cuttings root more easily and quickly. This is due to the gradual loss of expression of meristematic state genes and the accumulation of repressive epigenetic marks (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Meng et al., 2026).

Type and position of the explant. Different types of cuttings are optimal for different species: some root better from semi-hardwood (semi-mature) cuttings, others from green (herbaceous) or hardwood (winter) cuttings (Carmel et al., 2024). The part of the shoot is also important: in many plants, apical cuttings root better than basal ones due to higher endogenous auxin content (Hartmann et al., 2002).

Seasonality (phenological phase). The timing of cutting collection plays a decisive role. In most tree species, the best rooting results are observed at the beginning of shoot growth (spring) or after growth completion (late summer — early autumn), when tissues have maximum carbohydrate content and minimum inhibitors. For many species, cutting collection during the dormant phase (winter cuttings) or, conversely, during active vegetation (green cuttings) is optimal (Carmel et al., 2024; Hartmann et al., 2002).

Endogenous hormonal status. The level of endogenous auxins, cytokinins, and inhibitors (abscisic acid, phenolic compounds) in the explant tissues directly affects regeneration capacity. A high auxin/inhibitor ratio promotes rooting, while a high cytokinin/auxin ratio promotes shoot formation (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Carmel et al., 2024).

5.4. Resources and Reserve Substances

The formation of new organs (roots, shoots, tubers) requires significant expenditure of plastic and energy resources. Therefore, explants (cuttings, rhizome fragments, bulbs) must have sufficient reserves of carbohydrates (starch, sugars) and nitrogenous compounds. In many species, cuttings taken from well-lit and healthy plants root more successfully. In industrial cutting propagation, pre-treatment called ‘etiolation’ — shading the shoots — is sometimes used, which promotes starch accumulation and increases auxin content (Hartmann et al., 2002).

In the next section, we will examine the practical aspects of managing asexual reproduction in agronomy: from traditional methods (cuttings, layering) to modern biotechnological techniques (microclonal propagation, use of growth regulators).

6. Management Techniques and Applied Significance in Agronomy

Understanding the mechanisms of asexual, and especially vegetative, reproduction has enormous practical significance for agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and biotechnology. Humans have long used the ability of plants to regenerate to obtain planting material, preserve valuable genotypes, and accelerate the introduction of new varieties into production (Hartmann et al., 2002; Mozet, 2017). In this section, we will examine the main techniques for managing vegetative reproduction and their role in modern agronomy. A detailed description of each method of vegetative reproduction is provided in a separate article on our portal; here we will focus on key principles and significance.

6.1. Traditional Vegetative Propagation Techniques

All traditional methods are based on separating a part from the mother plant, which then roots and develops into an independent individual — a clone.

Cuttings

Cutting is a method of vegetative propagation in which segments of a shoot (stem cuttings), root (root cuttings), or leaf (leaf cuttings) are used. The success of cutting depends on the ability of tissues to form adventitious roots (on shoot cuttings) or adventitious shoots (on root cuttings) (Hartmann et al., 2002; Carmel et al., 2024).

Key factors for successful cutting:

  • Type of cutting: green (herbaceous), semi-hardwood, and hardwood cuttings respond differently to treatment and rooting conditions.

  • Treatment with growth regulators: to stimulate rooting, cuttings are treated with solutions or powders of auxins (indole-3-butyric acid — IBA, α-naphthaleneacetic acid — NAA). The optimal concentration ranges from 50 to 8000 mg/L depending on the species and type of cutting (Carmel et al., 2024; Hartmann et al., 2002).

  • Environmental conditions: high air humidity (mist systems), moderate temperature (+20…+25 °C), and an aerated substrate.

Cutting is widely used for propagation of fruit and berry crops (currants, gooseberries, grapes, many ornamental shrubs), houseplants (ficus, pelargoniums, succulents), as well as for obtaining rootstocks in nursery production (Mozet, 2017; Carmel et al., 2024).

Layering

Layering is the rooting of shoots without separating them from the mother plant. This method ensures nutrition for the rooting part from the parent bush, increasing the survival rate. Different types include simple layering, tip layering, serpentine layering, and air layering (Hartmann et al., 2002). Layering is used to propagate currants, gooseberries, grapes, and some ornamental shrubs (lilac, hydrangea).

Grafting

Grafting is the joining of a vegetative part of one plant (scion — a varietal shoot or bud) with a rooted plant of another (rootstock). The scion and rootstock must be botanically compatible (usually within the species, genus, or family). Grafting allows:

  • Preserving all varietal traits of the scion (e.g., large apple fruits).

  • Using a rootstock with valuable qualities: cold resistance, drought resistance, resistance to pests and diseases, dwarfing (Hartmann et al., 2002; Mozet, 2017).

  • Rapidly propagating varieties that root poorly as cuttings.

  • Rejuvenating old trees by replacing the canopy.

There are more than 100 grafting methods: budding (eye grafting), whip grafting, cleft grafting, bark grafting, bridge grafting, etc. Grafting is the foundation of modern intensive fruit growing and viticulture, as well as ornamental arboriculture (Mozet, 2017; Graham et al., 2014).

Propagation by Division, Bulbs, Tubers

Many perennial herbaceous plants are successfully propagated by dividing rhizomes (iris, chrysanthemum, aster), bulbs (tulip, lily, garlic), and tubers (potato, dahlia). This is a simple and reliable method for obtaining large planting material (Hartmann et al., 2002; Yakovlev et al., 2005).

6.2. Modern Biotechnological Methods

Microclonal Propagation (Tissue Culture in vitro)

This is the most advanced method for mass plant cloning, based on the totipotency of plant cells. Microscopic tissue fragments (explants) — usually apical or axillary meristems — are sterilized and placed on an artificial nutrient medium containing macro- and microelements, vitamins, sucrose, and phytohormones in carefully adjusted concentrations (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Mozet, 2017). The process includes several stages:

  1. Establishment — sterilization and planting of the explant.

  2. Multiplication — induction of multiple adventitious shoots from the meristem or callus using cytokinins.

  3. Rooting — transfer of shoots to a medium with auxins to stimulate root formation.

  4. Acclimatization — gradual adaptation of test-tube plants to greenhouse and open-ground conditions.

Advantages of microclonal propagation:

  • High multiplication rate — tens of thousands of plants per year can be obtained from one explant.

  • Sanitation of planting material — meristematic cells are often virus-free, so the method allows producing virus-free clones.

  • Genetic uniformity — all regenerants are clones.

  • Ability to propagate rare and slow-to-propagate species (orchids, some tree species).

  • Year-round process, independent of season.

The method is widely used in floriculture (chrysanthemums, carnations, orchids, anthuriums), fruit growing (strawberry, raspberry, apple, pear), potato production, and for conserving endangered plant species (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Mozet, 2017; Meng et al., 2026).

Use of Growth Regulators

In agronomic practice, synthetic auxin analogues (heteroauxin, Kornevin, NAA, IBA) are widely used to stimulate rooting in cuttings, as well as cytokinins (kinetin, BAP) for awakening dormant buds and enhancing shoot formation (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020; Carmel et al., 2024). Dosages and application methods (aqueous solutions, alcohol solutions, powders) depend on the plant species and type of cuttings.

6.3. Applied Significance in Agronomy

The use of techniques to manage asexual reproduction addresses the following tasks:

  1. Preservation of varietal purity. Vegetative propagation (including microclonal) is the only way to preserve the genotype of an elite variety, since seed offspring of heterozygous plants segregate (Graham et al., 2014; Mozet, 2017).

  2. Rapid propagation of new and promising varieties. Traditional methods (cuttings, grafting) allow a variety to be introduced into production within 2–4 years, and microclonal propagation even faster.

  3. Obtaining sanitized planting material. Meristem cloning is the main method for combating viral, bacterial, and fungal infections in nursery production (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020).

  4. Creating industrial plantations with uniform product. Clonal plantings (vineyards, apple orchards, potato fields) yield a uniform crop in shape, size, taste, and ripening time, which is necessary for mechanized harvesting and processing (Graham et al., 2014).

  5. Conserving the gene pool of rare and endangered species. In vitro methods (cryopreservation, slow growth) allow the creation of in vitro collections of plant genetic resources (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020).

6.4. Economic Aspects and Risks

  • Economic efficiency. Despite the higher cost of microclonal plants compared to traditional ones, they pay off due to earlier fruiting, high survival rate, and absence of diseases.

  • Risks: Clonal monoculture is vulnerable to epiphytotics (as in the case of the Irish potato famine). Therefore, in propagation programs, it is necessary to maintain collections of several different clones (varieties) for each crop (Graham et al., 2014). Additionally, prolonged in vitro cultivation can lead to somaclonal variations (mutations), which may disrupt clone uniformity (Bidabadi and Jain, 2020).

Thus, managing asexual reproduction is a powerful tool in modern crop production, allowing not only to preserve and propagate valuable genotypes but also to significantly increase the efficiency of agricultural production. The combination of traditional agronomic techniques with cutting-edge biotechnological methods opens prospects for creating sustainable and productive agroecosystems.

In the next, concluding section, we will summarize and consider the connection of asexual reproduction with other branches of botany and agronomy.

References

  1. Bidabadi, S.S., Jain, S.M. (2020). ‘Cellular, Molecular, and Physiological Aspects of In Vitro Plant Regeneration’, Plants, 9(6), 702. doi: 10.3390/plants9060702 (PubMed)
  2. Bidlack, J. E., Jansky, S. H. (2021). ‘Meiosis and Alternation of Generations’, in Stern's Introductory Plant Biology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 211-221.
  3. Carmel, Aqueala, Raman, Revathi, Arunachalam, Balasubramanian, Iyapillai, Sekar, Subbain, Devanand Pachanoor, Palaniswamy, Radha, Ramalingam, Vijayan, Ramasamy, Ramesh Karuppanan, Kandaswamy, Hemaprabha, Bhaskaran, Sujatha Kalleril, Rajan, Aiswaryalakshmi Ackathadathil, Prasad, Sujith Pandarikkal, Ilango, Yazhini (2025). ‘ENHANCING ROOTING AND SHOOTING IN VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION: THE ROLE OF GROWTH REGULATORS IN STEM AND COPPICE CUTTINGS’, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 33(0), 1253-1258.
  4. Evert, R.F., Eichhorn, S.E. (2013). ‘Fungi’, in Raven Biology of Plants. New York: W.H. Freeman, pp. 278-316.
  5. Graham, L.E., Graham, J.M., Wilcox, L.W. (2014). ‘Reproduction, Meiosis, and Life Cycles’, in Plant Biology. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, pp. 267-286.
  6. Hörandl, E. (2024). ‘Apomixis and the paradox of sex in plants’, Annals of Botany, 134(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae044 (PubMed)
  7. Mauseth, J. D. (2017). ‘Flowers and Reproduction’, in Botany: An Introduction to Plant Biology. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, ch. 9.
  8. Meng, X., Wang, Q., Zhu, S., Wang, J., Qi, C., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Mai, Y., Chang, Z., Cheng, Y., Xue, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, T. (2026). ‘Unravelling the predominant genetic paths for asexual reproduction in Kalanchoe’, Nature Plants, 12(2), 369-385. doi: 10.1038/s41477-025-02214-3 (PubMed)
  9. Strasburger, E., Noll, F., Schenck, H., Schimper, A. F. W. (1971). ‘Morphologie’, in von Denffer, D., Mägdefrau, K., Schumacher, W., Ehrendorfer, F. (ed.) Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, pp. 9-202.
  10. Яковлев, Г. П., Челомбитько, В. А., Дорофеев, В. И. (2008). ‘Рост, развитие и размножение [Growth, development and reproduction]’, in Ботаника [Botany]. Санкт-Петербург: СпецЛит, pp. 192-202.