Gametophyte-Dominant Life Cycle (Using Bryophytes as an Example)

Last updated: June 07, 2026

All land plants (Embryophyta) have a life cycle in which two multicellular generations regularly alternate: the gametophyte and the sporophyte (Raven et al., 2017; Simpson, 2019). This type of cycle is called haplodiplontic (Stern, 2020), or the alternation of generations. The alternation of nuclear phases (haploid and diploid) and generations varies among different plant groups, allowing for the identification of three main evolutionary types of cycles:

Bryophytes (Bryophyta sensu lato — liverworts, mosses, and hornworts) serve as a classic example of a cycle where the haploid gametophyte dominates (Mauseth, 2017; Ligrone et al., 2012). Here, "dominance" means that the gametophyte is the long-lived, photosynthetic, and independent plant, while the sporophyte is a short-lived organ dependent on the gametophyte and typically unbranched (Goffinet et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 2011).

Moss life cycle

Life cycle of a moss (using Polytrichum commune as an example)

The diagram includes all key stages: spore germination into a protonema, development of the gametophore with antheridia and archegonia, fertilization in liquid water, formation of the sporophyte (sporogonium) with a capsule on a seta, meiosis in the capsule, and spore dispersal. Ploidy levels (n/2n) and the processes of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilization are clearly indicated.

Gametophyte-dominant life cycle is a type of life cycle in land plants where the haploid gametophyte is the dominant generation (in terms of size, longevity, and physiological autonomy), while the diploid sporophyte is permanently attached to the gametophyte, derives nutrition from it, and is typically represented by a single sporangium (capsule) on a stalk (seta) or without one (Raven et al., 2017; Simpson, 2019).

In botanical literature, bryophytes are traditionally contrasted with vascular plants (Tracheophyta) precisely based on this characteristic: in mosses, liverworts, and hornworts, the gametophyte is the "main plant," whereas in ferns, the sporophyte becomes independent and larger, and the gametophyte is reduced to a small prothallus (Ekwealor & Fisher, 2024). Evolutionarily, this type of cycle is considered the closest to the ancestral state for all land plants (Ligrone et al., 2012; Vigneau & Borg, 2021).

This article will sequentially examine, using bryophytes as an example (primarily the model organisms common haircap moss — Polytrichum commune and the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha):

  • Morphology of the dominant gametophyte (leafy stem plant or thallus);
  • Structure of the sexual organs — antheridia and archegonia;
  • Dependence of fertilization on liquid water;
  • Development of the parasitic sporophyte (sporogonium) with its seta and capsule;
  • Meiosis and the formation of haploid spores;
  • Spore germination and the formation of a new gametophyte (protonema).

This analysis will not only help in understanding the specific cycle of mosses and liverworts but also in grasping the fundamental difference between the gametophyte-dominant and sporophyte-dominant types of development — a key concept in the evolution of the plant kingdom (Shaw et al., 2011).

1. General Characteristics of the Gametophyte-Dominant Cycle

The gametophyte-dominant life cycle is characteristic of all three groups of bryophytes: liverworts (Marchantiophyta), mosses (Bryophyta sensu stricto), and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (Goffinet et al., 2013). Its main distinguishing feature is the physiological and morphological dominance of the haploid gametophyte for the majority of the plant's life.

1.1. Alternation of Generations and Role Distribution

Like all land plants, the life cycle of bryophytes includes two multicellular phases:

  • Gametophyte (n) — the haploid generation that develops from a spore and produces gametes (egg cells and spermatozoids) by mitosis.
  • Sporophyte (2n) — the diploid generation that develops from a zygote and produces spores by meiosis.

In bryophytes, unlike vascular plants, the gametophyte is an autotrophic, long-lived, and independent organism, while the sporophyte is permanently attached to the gametophyte and obtains water, minerals, and organic nutrients from it (Ligrone et al., 2012; Shaw et al., 2011). This dependence of the sporophyte on the parental gametophyte — matrotrophy — is expressed in the presence of a specialized placenta at the contact point of the two generations (Raven et al., 2017).

1.2. Key Characteristics of the Cycle

Diagram of haplodiplontic, haplontic, and diplontic cycles

The three main types of life cycles in eukaryotes.

The haplodiplontic cycle (left) is characterized by the presence of two multicellular generations – the gametophyte (n) and the sporophyte (2n). This is the type found in bryophytes and all other land plants. The haplontic cycle (center) is typical of many green algae, while the diplontic cycle (right) is found in animals and some algae.

Comparing this with other types of alternation of generations (see table) clearly defines the specifics of the gametophyte-dominant cycle.

Characteristic Bryophytes (Gametophyte-dominant) Pteridophytes (Sporophyte-dominant) Seed Plants (Reduced Gametophyte)
Dominant Generation Gametophyte (green "plant") Sporophyte (fern plant) Sporophyte (tree, grass)
Sporophyte Dependency Complete, throughout its life Partial, only during the embryonic period None (the embryo is nourished by the seed)
Gametophyte Size and Complexity Large (from a few mm to 50 cm), leafy stem or thallose Small (prothallus, 5–10 mm in size) Reduced to a few cells (pollen grain, embryo sac)
Sporophyte Branching Absent (single sporangium on a stalk) Present (extensive branching, many sporangia) Present (complex shoot system)
Example *Polytrichum*, *Marchantia* *Dryopteris* *Pinus*, *Triticum*

The table shows that bryophytes are the only group where the gametophyte does not yield to the sporophyte in size and organizational complexity, and the sporophyte never becomes independent (Mauseth, 2017).

1.3. Evolutionary and Ecological Context

The gametophyte-dominant cycle is considered plesiomorphic (ancestral) for all land plants (Ligrone et al., 2012; Vigneau & Borg, 2021). Fossil remains of early Devonian plants (e.g., Rhynia) and phylogenetic data confirm that the ancestors of vascular plants also had a dominant gametophyte, which subsequently underwent reduction.

However, the retention of the gametophyte-dominant cycle in modern bryophytes is not primitiveness but a successful evolutionary strategy that allows them to occupy specific ecological niches (moist places, rocks, understory), where small size and direct dependence on liquid water are not disadvantages (Shaw et al., 2011; Ekwealor & Fisher, 2024).

1.4. Main Limitations Imposed by the Cycle Type

Two fundamental limitations arise from the dominance of the gametophyte:

1. Dependence of fertilization on water. Bryophyte spermatozoids are motile, with two flagella (undulipodia). Their movement from the antheridium to the archegonium requires a continuous water film (dew, rain, meltwater) (Stern, 2020).

2. Limitation of maximum size. The absence of a true conducting system (xylem and phloem) in the gametophyte and the dependence of the sporophyte on the parent plant prevent bryophytes from forming large, tree-like forms (Raven et al., 2017).

Nevertheless, within this general structural plan, bryophytes exhibit considerable diversity: from thallose liverworts to "true" leafy mosses up to 50 cm tall (e.g., Dawsonia).

1.5. Distinction from Other Cycle Types (Brief Summary)

It is important for an agricultural student to distinguish between the three types of cycles because:

  • Gametophyte-dominant cycle (bryophytes) — indicator of waterlogged soils, target for land reclamation (drainage of bogs).
  • Sporophyte-dominant cycle (ferns, horsetails) — found on acidic soils; some species are weeds (bracken fern).
  • Cycle of seed plants — the basis of modern agriculture.

Thus, understanding the general plan of the gametophyte-dominant cycle is necessary for a more detailed examination of developmental stages, gametophyte and sporophyte structure, and for comparative analysis with other plant divisions.

2. Organization of the Dominant Gametophyte

In bryophytes, it is the gametophyte that performs the main vegetative functions: photosynthesis, absorption of water and minerals, and attachment to the substrate. Based on their organization, bryophyte gametophytes are divided into two main morphological groups — thallose and leafy stem (Goffinet et al., 2013; Mauseth, 2017). We will examine their features using key taxa as examples.

2.1. Leafy Stem Gametophyte (using "true" mosses — Bryophyta sensu stricto as an example)

Sporophyte of the moss Physcomitrella patens

Sporophyte of the moss Physcomitrella patens

The photograph clearly shows the structure of the sporogonium: the green gametophyte (leafy stem plant), the brown stalk (seta), and the capsule (sporangium) without an operculum — an example of a cleistocarpous (non-dehiscent) type.

The classic object for studying the leafy stem gametophyte is Polytrichum commune (common haircap moss), as well as the model species Physcomitrella patens (Rensing et al., 2008; Naramoto et al., 2022).

Stem and leaves. The moss gametophyte has an axis (caulidium) bearing spirally arranged small leaves (phyllidia). Growth occurs via a single tetrahedral apical cell (Ligrone et al., 2012). Leaves in most mosses are unistratose (one cell layer thick), often with a central midrib — the costa (e.g., in Polytrichum), which performs a mechanical and weakly conductive function (Mauseth, 2017). In some mosses (Polytrichaceae), assimilation lamellae develop on the upper leaf surface, increasing the photosynthetic surface area (Raven et al., 2017).

Conducting cells. In some mosses (especially in large species like Polytrichum and Dawsonia), the center of the stem and the leaf costa contain specialized water-conducting cells called hydroids, as well as leptoids, which presumably transport organic substances (Ligrone et al., 2000; Goffinet et al., 2013). Hydroids are dead, empty cells with thin walls without lignin, distinguishing them from the true tracheids of vascular plants. Leptoids resemble sieve elements but are also not lignified.

Rhizoids. Unlike roots, mosses have multicellular, often branched rhizoids, which primarily attach the plant to the substrate rather than absorb water (Raven et al., 2017). Water absorption occurs over the entire surface of the gametophyte, especially through the unistratose leaves.

Development of the gametophyte from a spore. The moss gametophyte does not develop directly from the spore but through a filamentous protonema stage — a juvenile structure resembling a green alga (Stern, 2020). Buds form on the protonema, from which adult leafy stem plants (gametophores) develop. This two-stage process allows for rapid colonization of the substrate vegetatively.

2.2. Thallose Gametophyte (using liverworts and hornworts as examples)

In liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta), the gametophyte is a flattened thallus with dorsiventral organization.

Liverworts. Among liverworts, there are both thallose forms (e.g., Marchantia polymorpha, Riccia fluitans) and leafy stem forms (e.g., Porella, Frullania). The thallus of Marchantia is differentiated into an upper assimilatory tissue with air chambers and pore-like openings (but without true guard cells), as well as a lower storage tissue and rhizoids (Mauseth, 2017). Rhizoids in liverworts are unicellular (unlike in mosses). Cells of many liverworts contain characteristic oil bodies, whose function is likely related to protection against herbivores and desiccation (Crandall-Stotler et al., 2009; Simpson, 2019).

Hornworts. The gametophyte of hornworts (e.g., Anthoceros, Phaeoceros) is also thallose, dorsiventral, but more primitive in structure. A notable feature is the presence of a single large chloroplast with a pyrenoid in each cell (Renzaglia et al., 2009; Raven et al., 2017). Such mono-plastidy is unusual for other land plants but occurs in some green algae. The thallus contains mucous cavities colonized by nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria of the genus Nostoc, providing the gametophyte with available nitrogen.

2.3. General Principles of Gametophyte Organization in Bryophytes

Despite morphological differences, the gametophytes of all bryophytes share several common features:

1. Absence of true roots. Replaced by rhizoids (multicellular in mosses, unicellular in liverworts and hornworts).

2. Simplicity of tissue organization. Parenchyma predominates; mechanical tissue is absent or poorly developed; no lignin in conducting cells (hydroids are not lignified) (Ligrone et al., 2012).

3. Photosynthesis — the main function. The gametophyte is fully autotrophic and provides organic substances not only for itself but also for the attached sporophyte.

4. Presence of apical growth. Growth of the thallus or stem is achieved via a single apical cell (except in very rare cases) (Ligrone et al., 2012).

5. Longevity and capacity for vegetative reproduction. Gametophytes are perennial, easily regenerate from fragments, and often form specialized brood bodies (e.g., brood cups in Marchantia) (Mauseth, 2017).

2.4. Ecological Significance of Gametophyte Organization

The simple structure of the gametophyte and the absence of a deep root system allow bryophytes to colonize a wide range of substrates: from bare rocks and tree bark to poor sandy soils and raised bogs. The gametophytes of peat mosses (Sphagnum) possess unique hyaline cells (dead water-storage cells with pores) that can hold water 20–30 times their dry weight (Raven et al., 2017). This determines the role of Sphagnum in waterlogging and peat formation — a crucial aspect for agricultural land management (land drainage, peat extraction).

Thus, the dominant gametophyte of bryophytes is not a "primitive" but a highly specialized and ecologically plastic generation, ideally adapted for survival under conditions of periodic moisture and poor substrates.

In the next section, we will examine how sexual organs (antheridia and archegonia) develop on this gametophyte and what adaptations ensure fertilization in an aerial environment.

AliExpress WW

3. Detailed Life Cycle of Bryophytes

To understand the complete gametophyte-dominant cycle, it is necessary to trace all stages sequentially — from spore germination to spore formation in the capsule. The cycle can be conditionally divided into four major stages:

  • Stage 1 — development of gametophores (sexual generation) from spores.
  • Stage 2 — formation of sexual organs (antheridia and archegonia) and fertilization.
  • Stage 3 — development of the parasitic sporophyte (sporogonium) and spore formation.
  • Stage 4 — spore dispersal and renewal of the cycle.

Let's examine the first stage in detail.

3.1. Stage 1: Development of Gametophores (Sexual Generation)

The bryophyte gametophyte begins with a haploid spore. Spores in mosses, liverworts, and hornworts are produced by meiosis in the sporangium and are covered by a robust, resistant wall made of sporopollenin (Raven et al., 2017; Simpson, 2019). Upon reaching a moist environment at a suitable temperature, the spore germinates. However, germination varies significantly among different bryophyte groups.

Protonema — the Juvenile Stage of the Gametophyte

Protonema of the moss Physcomitrella patens

Protonema of the moss Physcomitrella patens under a microscope

Micrograph of a branched filamentous protonema. At the protonema stage, the young moss gametophyte resembles a filamentous green alga, indicating the evolutionary origin of land plants from algae.

In most mosses (Bryophyta), the spore first develops not into an adult leafy plant but into a special filamentous structure called the protonema (Mauseth, 2017; Stern, 2020). The protonema is a branched green filament composed of a single row of cells, resembling a filamentous green alga (e.g., Spirogyra or Cladophora). However, it can be distinguished by its oblique (rather than transverse) cross-walls and the presence of numerous small chloroplasts in many cells (as opposed to one or two large chloroplasts in algae).

The protonema performs two main functions:

1. Dispersal and anchorage — the filaments grow rapidly across the substrate, colonizing new areas.

2. Bud formation — buds are initiated at specific locations on the protonema (usually on the thicker cells of the caulonema), from which adult leafy plants — gametophores — develop (Naramoto et al., 2022).

In different groups of mosses, the protonema can be more or less long-lived. In many mosses (e.g., Funaria, Physcomitrella), the protonema persists for a long time and can even vegetate on its own, producing new gametophores (Ligrone et al., 2012). In peat mosses (Sphagnopsida), the protonema is plate-like and flat, rather than filamentous, which is considered a more primitive trait (Raven et al., 2017).

In liverworts (Marchantiophyta), the protonema is typically very short, often consisting of only a few cells, and quickly transitions to forming a thallus or leafy shoot (Crandall-Stotler et al., 2009). In hornworts (Anthocerotophyta), the protonema is absent altogether: the spore germinates directly into the thallus (Renzaglia et al., 2009).

Formation of Gametophores

The gametophore is the specialized part of the gametophyte that bears the sexual organs (gametangia — antheridia and archegonia) (Shaw et al., 2011). In mosses, the gametophore is a well-developed leafy plant (caulidium with phyllidia). In liverworts, the gametophore can be either a thallus (e.g., in Marchantia) or also leafy (e.g., in Porella). In hornworts, the gametophore is a simple thallus.

The development of the gametophore from a protonema bud involves the organization of an apical meristem with a single tetrahedral apical cell (in mosses) or a cell of a different shape (in liverworts) (Ligrone et al., 2012). This cell sequentially produces derivatives, which then differentiate into stem and leaf tissues. In mosses, phyllidia are arranged spirally, while in leafy liverworts, they are arranged in three rows (often two upper large rows and one lower reduced row) (Simpson, 2019).

Examples:

  • In Polytrichum commune (common haircap moss), gametophores reach 20–40 cm in height, are densely covered with stiff leaves, and form dense turfs (Mauseth, 2017).
  • In Marchantia polymorpha, the gametophore is a dorsiventral thallus, 2–4 mm thick, dichotomously branched, with rhizoids on the underside and air chambers on the upper side (Raven et al., 2017).
  • In hornworts (e.g., Anthoceros), the gametophore is a simple rosette-shaped plate, often with wavy margins, attached to the soil by rhizoids.

Time to Sexual Maturity and Factors Affecting Development

The ability of the gametophore to produce sexual organs is not immediate. In mosses in temperate climates, it can take from several months to two years from spore germination to the development of a mature gametophore bearing antheridia or archegonia (Raven et al., 2017). In liverworts, this process is often faster (a few weeks). Gametophore development is influenced by:

  • Light (photoperiod, intensity).
  • Moisture (optimally high).
  • Chemical composition of the substrate (e.g., Sphagnum mosses prefer acidic conditions).
  • Temperature (many species require stratification or a specific temperature regime).

It is important to note that most bryophyte gametophytes can also reproduce vegetatively (by fragments, brood bodies, gemmae), allowing them to rapidly colonize suitable habitats even when sexual reproduction is infrequent (Ekwealor & Fisher, 2024). However, understanding the complete cycle requires examining sexual reproduction specifically.

Brief Summary of Stage 1

Thus, the first stage of the cycle is the development from a haploid spore, first into a juvenile structure (the protonema, which is well-developed in mosses and poorly developed in liverworts), and then into an adult gametophore bearing future sexual organs. Key points to remember:

  • Spore (n) → protonema (n) → gametophore (n) — the sequence of gametophyte development.
  • The protonema is particularly characteristic of mosses and is an important adaptation for dispersal.
  • Gametophores of bryophytes are diverse in form (leafy in mosses and some liverworts, thallose in hornworts and some liverworts), but are always autotrophic and dominate the cycle.

In the next part (Stage 2), we will examine how sexual organs — antheridia and archegonia — form on the gametophores and how fertilization occurs.

3.2. Stage 2: Fertilization – The Critical Event

Fertilization in bryophytes is the key and most vulnerable stage of the life cycle, as it is possible only in the presence of liquid water. At this stage, motile male gametes (spermatozoids) must reach the immobile female gamete (egg cell) located deep within the archegonium.

Sexual Organs: Antheridia and Archegonia

In bryophytes, the sexual organs (gametangia) are always multicellular and protected by a layer of sterile (non-gamete-producing) cells (Raven et al., 2017). This is an important evolutionary acquisition that protects gametes from desiccation.

Antheridia (male sexual organs) — typically spherical or elongated sacs on a short stalk. Their wall (sterile "jacket") consists of a single layer of cells. Inside, numerous spermatogenous cells develop, each transforming into one spermatozoid (Mauseth, 2017). Bryophyte spermatozoids are curved, spirally coiled and bear two flagella (undulipodia) at the anterior end (Ligrone et al., 2012; Simpson, 2019). This structure enables motility in an aquatic environment. In most species, antheridia are formed on the same gametophores as archegonia (monoecious species) or on separate male plants (dioecious species).

Archegonia (female sexual organs) — have a characteristic flask (bottle) shape and consist of:

  • The venter — the swollen lower part, which contains a single large egg cell (haploid, n).
  • The neck — a long canal through which spermatozoids penetrate to the egg cell.
  • Neck canal cells and a ventral canal cell, which degenerate and mucilaginize upon archegonium maturation, forming a mucous canal (Raven et al., 2017).

The sterile wall of the archegonium also protects the egg cell from desiccation. In many mosses and liverworts, archegonia are grouped together, sometimes surrounded by modified leaves (perichaetial leaves) or a thallus outgrowth (pseudoperianth).

Chemotaxis and the Mechanism of Spermatozoid Attraction

When the archegonium matures, the neck canal cells and the ventral canal cell degenerate, and their contents are released. This exudate contains sugars (sucrose and others) and specific attractants (e.g., calcium-binding proteins), which create a concentration gradient (Mauseth, 2017). Spermatozoids exhibit chemotaxis — the ability to move towards higher concentrations of these substances, guiding them to the archegonial opening (Stern, 2020). In some species (e.g., mosses of the genus Bryum and liverworts), chemotaxis is highly effective, and spermatozoids can travel distances of several centimeters.

Role of Water and Mechanisms Facilitating Fertilization

Liquid water serves two functions:

1. A medium for spermatozoid swimming.

2. A means of transporting spermatozoids over significant distances (via splash dispersal from raindrops).

In species growing in dense turfs (e.g., Polytrichum), raindrops hitting the antheridial "disks" (specialized expanded tips of male plants) eject clusters of spermatozoids, which then settle on female plants (Ligrone et al., 2012). In the liverwort Marchantia, antheridia are located on stalked antheridiophores, shaped like umbrellas with lobes; rain washes out the spermatozoids, and they flow down the thallus surface towards the archegonia located on female archegoniophores (Mauseth, 2017).

In some mosses, a syndrome of spermatozoid transport by arthropods (phoragamy) has been described. For example, in the moss Bryum argenteum and several other species, microarthropods (springtails, mites) carry spermatozoids on their bodies between plants (Ekwealor & Fisher, 2024; Shaw et al., 2011). The role of flying insects (flies) is also known for mosses of the genus Splachnum, which are attracted by the odor emitted by the sporophytes.

The Fertilization Process

Under sufficient moisture, the antheridium opens (usually at the top), and thousands of motile spermatozoids are released. In water, they swim towards the archegonium, guided by the chemical gradient. One spermatozoid penetrates through the neck of the archegonium into the venter and fuses with the egg cell (Raven et al., 2017). The fusion of gametes (syngamy) results in the formation of a diploid (2n) zygote — the first cell of the next, sporophytic generation.

It is important to emphasize: in bryophytes, unlike algae, the zygote does not leave the archegonium but remains inside its venter. This provides protection and initial nourishment to the developing embryo — so-called matrotrophy (Stern, 2020). The archegonium and surrounding gametophyte tissues form a cap (calyptra) that will protect the young sporophyte.

Consequences of Water Dependence

The dependence of fertilization on water leads to several important ecological and biological consequences:

  • Association with moist habitats. Bryophytes are most diverse and active in forests, tundras, bogs, and along water bodies. However, many species survive in arid regions by using short rainy periods for reproduction (Shaw et al., 2011).
  • Advantage of dioecy under some conditions and monoecy under others. Dioecy (separate sexes) increases genetic diversity but requires male and female plants to be sufficiently close for successful spermatozoid dispersal (Ekwealor & Fisher, 2024). Monoecious species (hermaphroditic) can self-fertilize, ensuring zygote formation even at low population density.
  • Phenological adaptations. In many mosses (e.g., Sphagnum), archegonia mature in late winter or early spring, when meltwater creates ideal conditions for spermatozoid movement.

Brief Summary of Stage 2

Fertilization occurs in the second stage:

  • Antheridia formed on the gametophore produce spermatozoids, and archegonia produce the egg cell.
  • An obligatory requirement is the presence of liquid water (rain, dew, snowmelt).
  • Spermatozoids move chemotactically towards the archegonium, penetrate the venter, and fertilize the egg cell.
  • A diploid (2n) zygote is formed, which gives rise to the sporophyte.

This stage is the "bottleneck" in the life of bryophytes, but it is also the one that ensures genetic recombination and offspring diversity. In the next part (Stage 3), we will trace the development of the parasitic sporophyte from the zygote and how spores are formed within it.

3.3. Stage 3: The Parasitic Sporophyte

Following fertilization, the development of the diploid generation — the sporophyte — begins. In bryophytes, the sporophyte never becomes an independent organism. It remains attached to the gametophyte throughout its life and is entirely dependent on it for water, minerals, and organic nutrients (Ligrone et al., 2012). This dependency allows the bryophyte sporophyte to be termed parasitic or, more mildly, semi-parasitic (Mauseth, 2017). This very property — matrotrophy — sharply distinguishes bryophytes from all other land plants (Raven et al., 2017).

General Structure of the Sporogonium

The sporophyte of bryophytes is commonly called the sporogonium. In most mosses and liverworts, it consists of three parts (Simpson, 2019; Stern, 2020):

1. Foot — the basal part, embedded in the gametophyte tissue. The foot cells form haustorium-like outgrowths or transfer cells through which nutrients are absorbed from the gametophyte. At the generation boundary, a placenta — a zone of close contact with gametophyte cells, often featuring developed transfer cells — is formed (Ligrone et al., 2012).

2. Stalk, or seta — an elongated sterile axis that raises the sporangium above the gametophyte. In liverworts, the seta is very delicate and quickly withers; in mosses, it is more robust, often containing primitive conducting cells (hydroids and leptoids). In hornworts, the seta is absent (Renzaglia et al., 2009).

3. Capsule (sporangium) — the swollen terminal part where meiosis occurs and spores are formed.

Important: The sporophyte of bryophytes never branches (unlike the sporophytes of ferns, horsetails, and especially seed plants). It is always solitary and bears only one sporangium (Goffinet et al., 2013). If it appears that there are several capsules in some mosses (e.g., in Sphagnum), this results from the development of multiple sporogonia from different archegonia on the same gametophore, not from branching of a single sporophyte.

Development of the Sporogonium: From Zygote to Mature Capsule

The development of the sporogonium can be divided into several sequential stages.

1. Zygote and the first stage of embryogenesis. The zygote (2n), remaining within the archegonial venter, begins to divide. In mosses and liverworts, the first division of the zygote is transverse (relative to the long axis of the archegonium). In hornworts, it is longitudinal (Raven et al., 2017; Ligrone et al., 2012). A multicellular embryo develops from the zygote.

2. Formation of the foot and seta. In mosses, part of the embryo cells give rise to the foot and seta. Seta growth in mosses occurs via an intercalary meristem — a zone of cell division between the future capsule and the seta (Ligrone et al., 2012). In liverworts, the seta grows by cell elongation (diffuse growth) of already formed cells, rather than via a meristem.

3. Formation of the capsule (sporangium). The upper part of the embryo differentiates into the capsule. Within the capsule, the archesporium — the sporogenous tissue — is established, from which sporocytes (spore mother cells) later form. A multilayered capsule wall develops around the archesporium. In the central part of many mosses and hornworts, a sterile strand — the columella — forms, which helps in the even distribution of spores (Mauseth, 2017). Liverworts lack a columella.

4. Protective structures. The developing sporophyte is surrounded by remnants of the archegonium, which enlarge and form the calyptra — a cap covering the young capsule. The calyptra has a protective function and may also play a role in regulating transpiration and gas exchange of the sporophyte (Raven et al., 2017). As the capsule matures, the calyptra usually falls off.

Features in Different Bryophyte Groups

Male plant of Marchantia polymorpha

Male plant of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha

The photograph shows the gametophyte (thallus) of the liverwort with antheridiophores — umbrella-like stalks on which antheridia develop. Moisture running down the stalk helps spermatozoids disperse towards female plants.

In liverworts (Marchantiophyta), the sporophyte has a very short, quickly withering seta. The capsule is often spherical or ellipsoid and opens by longitudinal slits or valves. Inside, in addition to spores, there are sterile cells — elaters — with hygroscopic spiral thickenings that help shake out the spores when humidity changes (Crandall-Stotler et al., 2009; Simpson, 2019). Example: Marchantia polymorpha.

In mosses (Bryophyta), the sporophyte typically has a long, often rigid seta. The capsule has a more complex structure. In a mature capsule, one can distinguish the urn (the main spore-bearing body) and the operculum (lid). When spores mature, the operculum falls off, revealing the peristome — one or two rows of teeth sensitive to moisture (Goffinet et al., 2013). The peristome plays a key role in the controlled release of spores. Example: Polytrichum commune.

In hornworts (Anthocerotophyta), the seta is absent. The sporophyte is a long, awl-shaped or horn-like outgrowth, growing continuously from the base (indeterminate growth) via a basal intercalary meristem (Renzaglia et al., 2009). The mature sporophyte splits longitudinally from the apex to the base, gradually releasing the spores. Within the sporangium, in addition to spores, there are multicellular pseudoelaters.

Sporogenesis (Meiosis) and Spore Formation

Inside the capsule, the cells of the archesporium (sporogenous tissue) undergo meiosis. Each sporocyte (spore mother cell), being diploid (2n), divides by meiosis, forming four haploid spores (n) (Stern, 2020). In most bryophytes, all spores are of similar size — such species are called isosporous. Only in a few (e.g., some species of Sphagnum, Macromitrium) do spores differ in size (anoisospory, or anisospory), which is considered a step towards heterospory, characteristic of seed plants (Raven et al., 2017).

Spores are encased in a robust wall containing sporopollenin — one of the most resistant biopolymers, allowing spores to withstand adverse conditions (desiccation, temperature fluctuations) and remain viable for many years (Simpson, 2019). On the spore surface of mosses and some liverworts, there is a trilete mark — a three-rayed scar remaining from the spore tetrad.

Sporophyte Nutrition and Substance Transport

The bryophyte sporophyte is incapable of full photosynthesis. Although chloroplasts may be present in the cells of its tissues (especially in the capsule wall), the contribution of its own photosynthetic activity to the overall carbon budget of the sporogonium is very small (usually less than 10–20%) (Ligrone et al., 2012; Goffinet et al., 2013). The bulk of organic substances (sugars, amino acids), as well as water with dissolved minerals, come from the gametophyte.

Transport occurs through the placenta — a zone of close contact between the sporophyte foot and the gametophyte tissues. Here, cells of both generations often have cell wall ingrowths (transfer cells), increasing the absorption surface area (Ligrone et al., 2012). It is believed that substance movement occurs via the apoplast (through the cell walls) and is regulated by active transport.

Function of the Columella, Elaters, and Peristome

Columella (in mosses and hornworts) — a sterile central strand that provides mechanical strength and possibly water transport to the sporophyte (Mauseth, 2017).

Elaters (in liverworts) and pseudoelaters (in hornworts) — sterile cells that twist upon drying, helping to "loosen" the spore mass and expel spores from the capsule (Simpson, 2019).

Peristome of the moss Bryum capillare

Peristome of the moss Bryum capillare

Micrograph of the double peristome of the moss Bryum capillare. The outer (exostome) and inner (endostome) teeth, which regulate spore release depending on air humidity, are clearly visible.

Peristome (in mosses) — a crucial adaptation for controlled spore release. The peristome teeth are hygroscopic: in dry weather, they bend outwards, opening the exit for spores; in wet weather, they press against the opening, closing it (Goffinet et al., 2013). This prevents mass spore release during rain when wind dispersal is impossible.

Significance of the Sporophyte in Evolution and Ecology

Although the bryophyte sporophyte appears as an "appendage" to the gametophyte, its role in the life cycle is enormous. Thanks to the sporophyte, the following occur:

  • Genetic recombination (via meiosis) and the creation of genetically diverse spores.
  • Long-distance dispersal — spores, produced in enormous numbers (one sporogonium can produce up to 50 million spores), are easily carried by wind, water, and animals (Shaw et al., 2011).
  • Survival through unfavorable periods — the sporopollenin wall makes spores resistant to desiccation, frost, and UV radiation.

For agricultural science, understanding the structure of the bryophyte sporophyte is useful, for example, for identifying weed moss species by their capsules and peristome (since sporophytes often persist longer than gametophytes). Furthermore, the dispersal of spores of many moss species (e.g., Sphagnum) over vast areas is relevant to peatland reclamation and assessing the introduction of propagules into fields.

3.4. Stage 4: Spore Dispersal

The final stage of the bryophyte life cycle is the release of spores from the capsule and their dispersal. Spores serve as the sole means of sexual reproduction and dispersal to new territories. Successful dispersal determines the species' ability to colonize substrates, maintain populations in spatially separated habitats, and survive unfavorable periods (Shaw et al., 2011; Vanderpoorten & Goffinet, 2009).

Spore Maturation and Preparation for Dispersal

Once meiosis is complete, the spores inside the capsule are tightly packed, often mixed with sterile elements (elaters in liverworts or pseudoelaters in hornworts). For effective dispersal, spores must be:

  • dry and light — to be carried by wind;
  • resistant to external factors — due to their thick wall containing sporopollenin (Simpson, 2019);
  • freed from clumping — here, the hygroscopic movements of elaters or capsule dehiscence mechanisms help.

Simultaneously with spore maturation, dehydration (drying) of the capsule tissues and its seta occurs. In many mosses, the seta retains the ability to twist and untwist with changes in humidity, which also aids in spore ejection (Ligrone et al., 2012).

Mechanisms of Capsule Dehiscence and Spore Release

The three groups of bryophytes have developed different ways of releasing spores, reflecting their long independent evolution.

A. Liverworts (Marchantiophyta). The capsule in most liverworts opens via longitudinal slits (usually 4 slits) or irregularly (Crandall-Stotler et al., 2009). The capsule wall is one- or multi-layered. Inside are elaters — single cells with spiral wall thickenings containing water. Upon drying, the elaters twist and, as they straighten, "sweep" the spores out of the opened capsule (Mauseth, 2017; Simpson, 2019). Spore release is usually simultaneous (the capsule empties quickly).

B. Mosses (Bryophyta). In most "true" mosses (class Bryidae), the capsule has an operculum (lid), which detaches upon maturation. Beneath the operculum is the peristome — one or two rows of teeth formed from remnants of cell walls. The peristome is a key adaptation for controlled spore release (Goffinet et al., 2013). Working principle:

  • In dry weather, the peristome teeth bend outwards (or inwards, depending on the type), opening the aperture, and spores are released in batches.
  • When humidity increases, the teeth return to their original position, closing the capsule and preventing spore release during rain (Mauseth, 2017).
  • In peat mosses (Sphagnopsida), the capsule opens explosively: upon drying, it contracts, internal pressure builds up, and the operculum is shot off with a noise, ejecting a cloud of spores up to 10–15 cm high (Raven et al., 2017).

C. Hornworts (Anthocerotophyta). The sporophyte is a long horn. Dehiscence occurs longitudinally from the apex to the base in two (rarely four) valves. Since sporophyte growth is basal and indeterminate (Renzaglia et al., 2009), new spores mature gradually, so dehiscence and spore release are also spread over time. This mechanism resembles a "time capsule": spores are released in portions over several weeks or months. Inside the capsule, multicellular pseudoelaters also participate in loosening the spores (Raven et al., 2017).

Factors Affecting Dispersal Distance

Bryophyte spores are very small (usually 10–20 µm in diameter) and light. The main dispersal agents are:

1. Wind (anemochory) — the main factor for long-distance transport. Spores can rise in updrafts and be carried hundreds or thousands of kilometers (Shaw et al., 2011). This explains the wide distribution of many species and the relatively low level of endemism in bryophytes compared to flowering plants.

2. Water (hydrochory) — raindrops can knock spores out of capsules; meltwater and rainwater carry spores across the soil surface.

3. Animals (zoochory) — spores can adhere to the bodies of insects, birds, and mammals. For some species (e.g., mosses of the genus Splachnum, growing on dung), transport by flies is the main mechanism (Ekwealor & Fisher, 2024).

Dispersal distance can be vast, but effective dispersal (with successful germination and establishment) occurs over much shorter distances (usually meters, rarely kilometers) due to the need to land in a suitable moist microenvironment (Vanderpoorten & Goffinet, 2009).

Spore Germination and Return to the Gametophyte

When a spore (n) lands in suitable conditions — sufficient moisture, moderate temperature, often light (though some species require darkness) — it germinates. Germination begins with swelling and rupture of the exospore. In mosses, a filamentous chloronema or protonema emerges first (in Sphagnum, a plate-like protonema), which gives rise to the new gametophyte (Stern, 2020). In liverworts and hornworts, the protonema is short or absent, and the spore transitions directly to forming the thallus or the stem with leaves (Raven et al., 2017).

Thus, the cycle is completed: haploid spore → protonema → gametophore (gametophyte) → sexual organs → fertilization → zygote → sporophyte → meiosis → new haploid spores.

4. Evolutionary Significance and Role in Agrobotany

The gametophyte-dominant cycle of bryophytes is not an evolutionary dead end but a successful survival strategy that has persisted from the Silurian (about 470 million years ago) to the present day (Ligrone et al., 2012; Shaw et al., 2011). At the same time, this type of cycle imposes strict limitations on the morphology, ecology, and distribution of bryophytes. Understanding these limitations has direct implications for agricultural science — from land reclamation to assessing weed potential.

4.1. Evolutionary Fate of the Gametophyte-Dominant Cycle

In the evolution of land plants, a clear trend is observed: from gametophyte dominance (bryophytes) to sporophyte dominance (pteridophytes, gymnosperms, angiosperms) (Raven et al., 2017; Vigneau & Borg, 2021). Reasons for this shift:

  • Independence of the sporophyte from water for dispersal (spores, then seeds).
  • The possibility of developing large, branched bodies with true conducting tissues (xylem, phloem).
  • Protection and nourishment of the embryo by the maternal sporophyte (seed, fruit).

Bryophytes remained at the "primitive" level, but this allowed them to occupy ecological niches inaccessible to large vascular plants: bare rocks, tree bark, forest litter, raised bogs (Shaw et al., 2011). Their success lies in their ability to reproduce rapidly vegetatively, withstand complete desiccation (many xerophytic mosses), and disperse via spores over vast distances.

4.2. Why Didn't the Gametophyte-Dominant Cycle Produce "Giants"?

Despite the presence in some mosses (e.g., Dawsonia up to 50 cm tall) and ancient fossil forms (Prototaxoxylon, possibly related to mosses), bryophytes never reached the size of modern trees. The main reasons (Ligrone et al., 2012; Goffinet et al., 2013):

1. Absence of a lignified conducting system. Bryophyte hydroids lack lignin, collapse easily under water stress, and cannot conduct water to heights exceeding 1–2 meters.

2. Dependence of the sporophyte on the gametophyte. The sporophyte cannot independently supply itself with water and nutrients, so its size is limited by the gametophyte's capabilities.

3. No secondary growth. Bryophytes lack a cambium, so the stem does not thicken and cannot mechanically support a heavy crown.

4. Fertilization requires water. Even if the gametophyte were large, a water film would still be necessary for gamete fusion, tying them to moist habitats.

Thus, the gametophyte-dominant cycle represents an evolutionary compromise: small size and simple organization are traded for the ability to survive in extreme conditions and disperse rapidly (Shaw et al., 2011).

4.3. Comparison with Other Cycle Types (Focus on Agricultural Aspects)

Life cycle of Physcomitrium patens

Life cycle of the moss Physcomitrium patens (gametophyte-dominant type).

The diagram shows the alternation of haploid (n, green elements) and diploid (2n, yellow elements) generations. The spore (n) germinates into a filamentous protonema, on which a leafy gametophore forms. The gametophore bears antheridia (♂) and archegonia (♀). After fertilization in liquid water, the sporophyte (sporogonium) develops, consisting of a foot, seta, and capsule (sporangium). Meiosis occurs in the capsule, producing haploid spores, and the cycle is completed.

For an agronomist, it is important to distinguish between the three types of life cycles, as each is associated with specific groups of weedy or useful plants.

  • Gametophyte-dominant (bryophytes): Indicator weeds of waterlogging and soil acidification (Sphagnum mosses in meadows). Control measures — drainage, liming.
  • Sporophyte-dominant with independent gametophyte (pteridophytes): Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) — a difficult-to-eradicate pasture weed, poisonous to livestock. Control — mowing, herbicides (Raven et al., 2017).
  • Sporophyte-dominant with reduced gametophyte (seed plants): Cultivated cereals, legumes, vegetables — the basis of agroecosystems.

Understanding the differences in cycles helps predict the appearance of certain species in fields and select effective control methods.

4.4. Agrobotanical Significance of Bryophytes

In agricultural landscapes, bryophytes play both a positive and a negative role.

Negative significance:

  • Waterlogging and reduced land productivity. Sphagnum mosses, when they spread, acidify the soil and cause waterlogging of pastures and hayfields (Raven et al., 2017). In the non-chernozem zone of Russia, this is a serious problem.
  • Competition for light and nutrients. Dense turfs of mosses (e.g., Polytrichum commune) suppress the seedlings of perennial grasses and hinder their regeneration.
  • Deterioration of soil aeration. A continuous moss cover impedes gas exchange in the root zone.
  • Indicators of acidity. The appearance of mosses of the genus Sphagnum or Polytrichum in a field signals soil acidification and the need for liming (Ekwealor & Fisher, 2024).

Positive significance:

  • Peat formation. Peat mosses are the main component of peat, used as organic fertilizer, animal bedding, and a component of greenhouse substrates (Mauseth, 2017).
  • Water regime regulation. Moss cover in forests and bogs retains moisture, preventing erosion and regulating runoff.
  • Carbon sequestration. Sphagnum bogs are among the main sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide in the temperate zone.
  • Antiseptic properties. Due to their phenolic compounds, Sphagnum has been used as a dressing material (Raven et al., 2017).

4.5. Evolutionary Lessons for Breeding and Biotechnology

Studying the genetic regulation of the alternation of generations in model bryophytes (Physcomitrella patens, Marchantia polymorpha) provides valuable knowledge for understanding the development of vascular plants (Naramoto et al., 2022; Rensing et al., 2008). For example, genes controlling the transition from gametophyte to sporophyte in mosses (KNOX, BELL, LEAFY) are homologous to genes regulating the development of apical meristems in cereals and legumes (Shaw et al., 2011; Vigneau & Borg, 2021). Studying the resistance of mosses to drought and cold helps identify candidate genes for creating stress-tolerant crops.

References

  1. Bidlack, J. E., Jansky, S. H. (2021). ‘Meiosis and Alternation of Generations’, in Stern's Introductory Plant Biology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 211-221.
  2. Ekwealor, J.T.B., Fisher, K.M. (2024). ‘Reproduction and Population Dynamics in Autonomous Gametophytes’, International Journal of Plant Sciences, 185(4), 309-320. doi: 10.1086/729606
  3. Evert, R.F., Eichhorn, S.E. (2013). ‘Bryophytes’, in Raven Biology of Plants. New York: W.H. Freeman, 366-390.
  4. Goffinet, B., Buck, W.R. (2012). ‘The Evolution of Body Form in Bryophytes’, in Ambrose, B.A., Purugganan, M. (ed.) Annual Plant Reviews Volume 45. The Evolution of Plant Form. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell (or John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.), pp. 51-90. doi: 10.1002/9781118305881.ch2
  5. Kumar, A., Giri, P., Uniyal, P.Lal (2022). ‘Plastogenomics Provides a Tool to Study Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Monilophytes: A Review’, in Ferns. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 59-98. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-6170-9_4
  6. Ligrone, R., Duckett, J.G., Renzaglia, K.S. (2012). ‘Major transitions in the evolution of early land plants: a bryological perspective’, Annals of Botany, 109(5), 851-871. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs017 (PubMed)
  7. Mauseth, J. D. (2017). ‘Nonvascular Plants: Mosses, Liverworts, and Hornworts’, in Botany: An Introduction to Plant Biology. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, ch. 20.
  8. Naramoto, S., Hata, Y., Fujita, T., Kyozuka, J. (2021). ‘The bryophytes Physcomitrium patens and Marchantia polymorpha as model systems for studying evolutionary cell and developmental biology in plants’, The Plant Cell, 34(1), 228-246. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab218 (PubMed)
  9. Sakil, M.Arif (2025). ‘Physcomitrium patens: an emerging model for autophagy study’, Protoplasma, 0(0), null. doi: 10.1007/s00709-025-02148-9 (PubMed)
  10. Shaw, A.Jonathan, Szövényi, P., Shaw, B. (2011). ‘Bryophyte diversity and evolution: Windows into the early evolution of land plants’, American Journal of Botany, 98(3), 352-369. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000316 (PubMed)
  11. Simpson, M. G. (0). ‘Evolution and Diversity of Green and Land Plants’, in Plant Systematics. Amsterdam: Academic Press (imprint of Elsevier), 146-185.
  12. Vigneau, J., Borg, M. (2021). ‘The epigenetic origin of life history transitions in plants and algae’, Plant Reproduction, 34(4), 267-285. doi: 10.1007/s00497-021-00422-3 (PubMed)
  13. Youngstrom, C.E., Irish, E.E., Cheng, C. (2022). ‘The Crucial Role of Ceratopteris richardii in Understanding the Evolution of the WOX Gene Family’, in Ferns. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 135-147. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-6170-9_6
  14. Яковлев, Г. П., Челомбитько, В. А., Дорофеев, В. И. (2008). ‘Царство Растения - Plantae, Phytobionta, или Vegetabilia [Plant Kingdom - Plantae, Phytobionta, or Vegetabilia]’, in Ботаника [Botany]. Санкт-Петербург: СпецЛит, pp. 330-364.