Plastids
Plastids of the plant cell are semi-autonomous double-membrane organelles of eukaryotic origin, characteristic of photosynthetic plants, algae, and some protists that entered symbiosis with algae. They contain their own circular DNA molecule (plastome), 70S ribosomes, and are capable of division, but most plastid proteins are encoded in the nucleus and imported from the cytosol (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006). Plastids exhibit high structural and functional diversity: they can be green (chloroplasts), yellow, orange, or red (chromoplasts), as well as colorless (leucoplasts) (Choi et al., 2021; Sierra et al., 2023).
According to the widely accepted endosymbiotic theory, plastids originated from an ancient cyanobacterium that was engulfed by a heterotrophic eukaryotic ancestor about 1–1.5 billion years ago (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Renna et al., 2026). During co‑evolution, the endosymbiont lost its cell wall, transferred most of its genes to the host nucleus, and turned into an organelle surrounded by two membranes (the outer membrane derived from the host’s phagosomal vacuole, the inner from the cyanobacterium’s plasma membrane). Key evidence for this theory includes the similarity of 16S rRNA sequences of plastid ribosomes to those of modern cyanobacteria, the presence of a peptidoglycan layer in the plastids of glaucophyte algae, and homology of plastid division proteins (FtsZ) with bacterial division proteins (López‑Juez, 2007; Evert, 2006; Renna et al., 2026).
There is also the “ménage à trois” hypothesis, according to which, in the early stages of plastid evolution, not only a cyanobacterium but also bacteria of the group Chlamydiae participated in organelle formation. These bacteria may have supplied genes facilitating the metabolic integration of the endosymbiont with the host (e.g., transporter and protein import genes). Although this hypothesis remains debatable, it explains the presence of proteins of chlamydial origin in plastid proteomes (Renna et al., 2026).
In higher plants, all plastids originate from undifferentiated proplastids that arise in meristematic tissues (the embryo, root and shoot apical meristems). Proplastids are small colorless organelles (0.5–1.0 μm) that, upon cell differentiation under the influence of light, hormones, and tissue‑specific signals, transform into chloroplasts, chromoplasts, leucoplasts, or etioplasts (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Choi et al., 2021). In most angiosperms, plastids are inherited maternally (through the egg cell cytoplasm), which is important for cytoplasmic selection and the preservation of economically valuable traits (Evert, 2006).
Thus, plastids are not merely “photosynthetic factories” but a dynamic system of interconvertible organelles united by a common endosymbiotic origin. Understanding their evolutionary nature is essential for comprehending herbicide sensitivity, biotechnological methods of plastome transformation, and mechanisms of plant stress tolerance (Sierra et al., 2023; Altamura et al., 2024).
1. Functions of Plastids
Plastids perform a wide range of functions far beyond photosynthesis. Their roles are determined by the ability to specialize (different plastid types) and to interconvert, which allows the plant to flexibly redistribute metabolic tasks depending on tissue type, developmental stage, and environmental conditions (Sierra et al., 2023; Choi et al., 2021). The main functions are listed below, based on the provided sources.
1.1. Photosynthesis
The main function of chloroplasts is the light‑dependent conversion of carbon dioxide and water into organic compounds with the release of oxygen. Photosynthesis includes the light phase (on thylakoid membranes) and the dark phase (Calvin cycle in the stroma). Chloroplasts contain pigments: chlorophylls a and b, as well as carotenoids (lutein, β‑carotene, xanthophylls), which participate in light absorption and photoprotection (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006). Photosynthesis provides the organic matter that forms the basis of crop yield.
1.2. Storage of Reserve Substances
Leucoplasts (amyloplasts, elaioplasts, proteinoplasts) serve as depots for starch, lipids, and storage proteins. Amyloplasts accumulate starch in potato tubers, root crops, and cereal endosperm; they also act as statoliths in the root cap, mediating gravitropism. Elaioplasts synthesize and store oils (rapeseed, sunflower, avocado seeds). Proteinoplasts contain storage proteins (aleurone grains in cereal and legume seeds) (Choi et al., 2021; Sierra et al., 2023; Evert, 2006).
1.3. Synthesis of Key Metabolites
Plastids are hubs for many biosynthetic pathways:
-
Fatty acid synthesis (in the plastid stroma) with subsequent export to the endoplasmic reticulum for membrane lipid formation.
-
Shikimate pathway for aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan) – target of the herbicide glyphosate.
-
Isoprenoid pathway (MEP pathway): synthesis of carotenoids, phytol (a component of chlorophyll), tocopherols (vitamin E), phylloquinones (vitamin K1), and gibberellins.
-
Nitrogen and sulfur assimilation: reduction of nitrates and sulfates into amino acids (glutamate, aspartate, cysteine) (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
1.4. Formation of Flower and Fruit Color (Attraction)
Chromoplasts accumulate carotenoids (lycopene, β‑carotene, xanthophylls), giving fruits and petals yellow, orange, and red hues. This has triple significance: attracting pollinators and seed dispersers, providing a visual ripening marker for harvest, and increasing nutritional value (β‑carotene is provitamin A). Chromoplasts often form from chloroplasts during fruit ripening (tomato, pepper, pumpkin) (Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026; Choi et al., 2021; Sadali et al., 2019).
1.5. Phytohormone Synthesis and Signaling Function
Plastids synthesize precursors of abscisic acid (ABA) – xanthoxin – as well as cytokinins and some forms of jasmonic acid. In addition, plastids participate in retrograde signaling: under stress (drought, salinity, photodamage) they generate signaling molecules (reactive oxygen species, 3′‑phosphoadenosine‑5′‑phosphate (PAP), β‑cyclocitral, methylerythritol cyclodiphosphate (MEcPP)), which alter the expression of nuclear genes, adapting the cell to new conditions (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Altamura et al., 2024; Sierra et al., 2023).
1.6. Role in Stress and Defense
Under heavy metals (Cd, Pb, As), salinity, or drought, characteristic ultrastructural changes occur in plastids: thylakoid swelling, increased number and size of plastoglobuli, starch accumulation or conversely its degradation. Plastids generate signals that trigger the expression of antioxidant genes and heat shock genes. Sensory plastids of the epidermis and phloem (SEP) specialize in perceiving pathogens and abiotic stresses, moving toward the nucleus and forming stromules (Altamura et al., 2024; Sierra et al., 2023).
1.7. Ecological and Adaptive Functions
Bright chromoplasts in petals attract pollinators, and in fruits attract seed dispersers. In some plants (e.g., Begonia species under deep shade), chloroplasts convert into iridoplasts – specialized plastids with ordered thylakoid lamellae that enhance light capture efficiency (Sierra et al., 2023). In xerophytes and succulents, plastids participate in water storage and UV protection.
1.8. Interaction with Other Organelles
Plastids are closely connected with the endoplasmic reticulum (lipid exchange), mitochondria (photorespiration, malate‑aspartate shuttle), peroxisomes (glycolate pathway), and the vacuole (autophagy of senescing plastids). These interactions occur via membrane contact sites (MCS) and stromules (Renna et al., 2026; Altamura et al., 2024).
1.9. Significance for Agricultural Practice
For the agronomist, plastid functions are important in the following aspects:
-
Yield (photosynthesis, starch and oil accumulation).
-
Product quality (fruit color, carotenoid and protein content).
-
Herbicide resistance (targets in plastids – EPSPS, D1 protein, protoporphyrinogen oxidase).
-
Biotechnology (plastome transformation to obtain recombinant proteins and carotenoids).
-
Stress tolerance (retrograde signaling and activation of defense genes) (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Altamura et al., 2024; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
2. Types of Plastids

Types of Plastids: Diversity and Main Functions
Schematic representation of the main types of plastids.
In higher plants, several main types of plastids are distinguished. They differ in pigment composition, ultrastructure, shape, size, and functions. All are genetically related and originate from small undifferentiated proplastids formed in meristematic tissues (embryo, root and shoot apical meristems). Under the influence of light, tissue‑specific signals, phytohormones, and developmental stage, proplastids turn into chloroplasts, chromoplasts, leucoplasts, or etioplasts. All plastids are capable of interconversion, but the degree of reversibility varies: for example, the transition of a chloroplast into a chromoplast during fruit ripening is irreversible in most crops (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006).
Below, each major plastid type is considered in detail, with emphasis on ultrastructure, chemical composition, cellular localization, and physiological role. A summary table is provided at the end of the section for systematization.
2.1. Chloroplasts
Chloroplasts are the most studied plastid type, carrying out photosynthesis. They contain green pigments – chlorophylls a and b – as well as carotenoids (lutein, β‑carotene, violaxanthin, neoxanthin). Chloroplasts are found in all green parts of plants; they are especially numerous in leaf mesophyll and young stems (Evert, 2006; Wise, 2007, cited in Choi et al., 2021).
Shape, size, and position in the cell. In higher plants, chloroplasts are biconvex lens‑shaped or ellipsoidal, more rarely cup‑shaped or ribbon‑like (in some algae). Typical dimensions: length 5–10 μm, width 2–4 μm, thickness 1–2 μm. A typical mesophyll leaf cell contains 50 to 150 chloroplasts (Evert, 2006). They are located along the cell wall (peripheral position), optimizing light capture and facilitating gas exchange. When illumination changes, chloroplasts can move (phototaxis): under low light they accumulate on walls parallel to the leaf surface; under bright light they orient along walls perpendicular to the incident light to avoid photodamage (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006).
Chemical composition. Based on dry mass, chloroplasts contain: proteins (50–55%, mainly Calvin cycle enzymes and membrane proteins of photosystems); lipids (25–30%), predominantly galactolipids and phospholipids of thylakoid membranes; pigments (8–12%): chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids; nucleic acids (3–5%): plastome (circular DNA) and RNA; low‑molecular‑weight compounds (ascorbate, glutathione, starch, Mg2+, Fe2+). Carotenoids play a photoprotective role, quenching reactive oxygen species and contributing to non‑photochemical quenching of excess energy (Evert, 2006; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Functions. The main function of chloroplasts is photosynthesis, comprising the light phase (on thylakoid membranes) and the dark phase (Calvin cycle in the stroma). In addition, chloroplasts carry out: fatty acid synthesis, amino acid synthesis, isoprenoid synthesis (carotenoids, tocopherols, phylloquinones), as well as temporary starch deposition. Chloroplasts participate in retrograde signaling, transmitting information about the redox status of the electron transport chain to the nucleus (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Altamura et al., 2024; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
Constituent elements (substructure). The chloroplast is surrounded by two membranes (outer and inner), with an intermembrane space between them. The internal content is the stroma (a protein‑lipid matrix containing Calvin cycle enzymes, circular DNA, 70S ribosomes, starch grains, and plastoglobuli). Embedded in the stroma is the thylakoid system – flattened membrane sacs. Thylakoids form stacks – grana (10 to 100 thylakoids per granum). Grana are connected by stroma thylakoids (lamellae). Thylakoid membranes contain the pigment‑protein complexes of photosystems I and II, ATP synthase, and the cytochrome b6f complex (Evert, 2006; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
It is important to emphasize that the thylakoid membrane is impermeable to protons, which is necessary for generating the electrochemical gradient in the light phase. The stroma contains 70S ribosomes (prokaryotic type), circular DNA (several copies per chloroplast), starch grains (transitory starch deposited during the day), plastoglobuli (lipid droplets containing tocopherols and quinones), and Calvin cycle enzymes (including Rubisco – up to 50% of soluble leaf protein). Chloroplasts divide by binary fission (independently of cell division), and their proteins are partly synthesized in situ (on plastid ribosomes) and partly imported from the cytosol via specialized TIC/TOC complexes (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006).
Developmental features. Proplastids in meristems differentiate into chloroplasts under the influence of light. In the absence of light, proplastids turn into etioplasts containing a prolamellar body. Upon illumination, etioplasts rapidly (within a few hours) transform into chloroplasts. In many plants, chloroplasts can also arise from leucoplasts (e.g., greening of potato tubers in the light) or from chromoplasts (rare regreening in citrus) (Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006; Rodríguez‑Concepción & Stange, 2013, cited in Choi et al., 2021).
Significance for agricultural science. Chloroplasts are the main source of organic matter in agricultural crops. Breeding for increased chloroplast numbers in leaves, higher photosynthetic efficiency, and resistance to photoinhibition are important directions for increasing yield. Understanding protein import mechanisms into chloroplasts and their retrograde signaling is used to create herbicide‑resistant and stress‑tolerant varieties (Altamura et al., 2024; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
2.2. Chromoplasts
Shape, size, and position in the cell. Chromoplasts are plastids specialized for the synthesis and accumulation of carotenoid pigments, which impart yellow, orange, or red colors to tissues. They exhibit great morphological diversity: shapes may be spherical, ellipsoidal, needle‑like, crescent‑shaped, spindle‑shaped, or even crystal‑like. Sizes range from 3 to 7 μm. In the cell, chromoplasts are usually distributed diffusely, without the strict peripheral positioning typical of chloroplasts. Shape and size depend on plant species, tissue type, and developmental stage: in ripening tomato fruits chromoplasts are rounded, in carrot (taproot) they are elongated, in buttercup petals they are angular (Sitte et al., 1980, cited in Evert, 2006; Sadali et al., 2019; Sierra et al., 2023).
Chemical composition. Chromoplasts are almost devoid of chlorophylls (their content does not exceed 0.1–0.5% of chloroplast levels), so they are incapable of photosynthesis. The main pigments are carotenoids:
-
β‑carotene (orange, common in carrot roots and pumpkin);
-
lycopene (red, characteristic of ripe tomato and watermelon fruits);
-
xanthophylls (yellow: lutein, violaxanthin, neoxanthin, capsanthin – in pepper).
Carotenoids accumulate in the stroma either as droplets (in plastoglobuli), or as crystals, or as fibrillar or tubular structures in complex with lipids and specific proteins (fibrillins). Lipid content in chromoplasts can reach 40% of dry mass, ensuring dissolution of hydrophobic carotenoids. Ribosomes and the plastome are retained, but their transcriptional activity is significantly reduced compared to chloroplasts. Proteins are less abundant in chromoplasts because many photosynthetic enzymes are degraded (Camara et al., 1995, cited in Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006).
Functions. The main functions of chromoplasts:
-
Attraction – bright colors of petals, fruits, and seeds attract pollinators (insects, birds) and seed dispersers (animals). This is a crucial ecological and evolutionary factor.
-
Carotenoid storage – accumulation of provitamin A (β‑carotene) and antioxidants (lycopene, lutein) increases the nutritional value of fruits and root crops (carrot, pumpkin, sweet pepper, tomato).
-
Deposition of excess metabolites – when chloroplasts break down during fruit ripening, carotenoids are not degraded but preserved in chromoplasts, preventing oxidative stress.
-
Synthesis of some isoprenoids (to a lesser extent than in chloroplasts) and participation in the formation of aromatic compounds (Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026; Sadali et al., 2019).
For agricultural practice, breeding for intense chromoplast coloration is directly related to the market quality of vegetables and fruits. Tomato varieties with high lycopene content (red) and carrots with high β‑carotene (orange) are created through genetic control of chromoplast differentiation (Giuliano et al., 2008, cited in Choi et al., 2021).
Types of chromoplasts (ultrastructure classification). Chromoplasts are the most heterogeneous category of plastids. Depending on the form of carotenoid‑containing structures, four main types are distinguished (Sitte et al., 1980, cited in Evert, 2006; Sadali et al., 2019):
| Chromoplast type | Characteristics | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Globular | Numerous plastoglobuli, often concentrated beneath the envelope. Remnants of thylakoids may persist. | Buttercup petals (Ranunculus repens), yellow pepper fruits (Capsicum), tulip perianth (Tulipa), citrus fruits. |
| Membranous | Up to 20 concentric (paired) carotenoid‑containing membranes. Thylakoids absent. | Narcissus petals (Narcissus pseudonarcissus) and Citrus sinensis. |
| Tubular | Carotenoids are incorporated into filamentous lipoprotein “tubules”. | Red pepper fruits (Capsicum annuum), rose hip (Rosa), nasturtium petals (Tropaeolum). |
| Crystalline | Contain crystalline inclusions of pure carotene (β‑carotene or lycopene), arising inside thylakoids and retained within the envelope. | Carrot taproot (Daucus carota), tomato fruit (Solanum lycopersicum). |
Globular chromoplasts are considered the most widespread and evolutionarily ancient type (Camara et al., 1995, cited in Evert, 2006).
Development (origin). Chromoplasts can develop by several pathways (Choi et al., 2021; Sadali et al., 2019):
-
From chloroplasts (best studied pathway) – during fruit ripening (tomato, pepper, chili) or petal senescence. The process includes: chlorophyll degradation, thylakoid membrane breakdown, disappearance of plastid ribosomes and rRNA, enhanced carotenoid synthesis and their accumulation in plastoglobuli or crystals. This transition is often irreversible.
-
From proplastids – for example, in watermelon, papaya fruits, and in carrot callus during differentiation.
-
From leucoplasts – in carrot roots (white roots contain amyloplasts, orange ones – chromoplasts), in cauliflower inflorescences (the Orange mutant), in endosperm of transgenic rice and maize upon overexpression of carotenogenesis genes.
In some species, reverse transition – regreening (chromoplast → chloroplast) – is possible, e.g., in citrus upon blue light treatment, in cucumber and pumpkin. However, in most crops (tomato, pepper) this process is not observed (Choi et al., 2021; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
Constituent elements (substructure). Like chloroplasts, chromoplasts are surrounded by two membranes (outer and inner). The thylakoid system is absent or reduced to single vesicles. The internal space is filled with stroma containing:
-
Plastoglobuli (lipid droplets) – greatly increased in number compared to chloroplasts; they are where carotenoids are dissolved (in globular chromoplasts).
-
Fibrillar or tubular protein structures (e.g., in pepper, structures binding capsanthin and capsorubin are formed).
-
Carotenoid crystals (in carrot, β‑carotene crystallizes; in tomato, lycopene).
-
Circular DNA, 70S ribosomes (although translation is greatly reduced), sometimes residual thylakoid membranes (Evert, 2006; Sadali et al., 2019).
Molecular regulators. Key genes controlling chromoplast development:
-
RIN (Ripening Inhibitor), TAGL1, NOR – MADS‑box and NAC transcription factors of tomato, regulating fruit ripening and expression of carotenogenesis genes (PSY1, PDS).
-
OR (Orange) – a protein with chaperone activity (DnaJ‑like), stabilizing phytoene synthase (PSY) and promoting β‑carotene accumulation. The Or mutation in cauliflower leads to chromoplast development in inflorescences instead of leucoplasts.
-
HY5 – a bZIP transcription factor activated by light, binding to the promoters of PSY and PDS.
-
SlSGR1 (Stay‑Green 1) – a repressor that interacts with PSY1 and inhibits its activity (Choi et al., 2021; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
Significance for agricultural science. Chromoplasts determine the commercial appearance and nutritional value of fruits and root crops. Understanding their biology is necessary for:
-
managing harvest times (in tomatoes, peppers, carrots) – chloroplast‑to‑chromoplast conversion correlates with sugar accumulation and cell wall softening;
-
breeding for increased carotenoid content (β‑carotene, lycopene, lutein);
-
creating transgenic plants with chromoplasts in non‑characteristic tissues (e.g., “golden rice” with β‑carotene in the endosperm);
-
using chromoplasts as bioreactors for accumulating valuable carotenoids (Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026; Choi et al., 2021; Sadali et al., 2019).
2.3. Leucoplasts
Shape, size, and position in the cell. Leucoplasts (from Greek leukós – white) are colorless plastids lacking photosynthetic pigments. They have a rounded, ovoid, amoeboid, or irregular shape; sizes are usually 1–3 μm (in some cases up to 5 μm). In the cell, leucoplasts are most often located near the nucleus or around the central vacuole, as well as in tissues not exposed to light: roots, tubers, seeds, endosperm, storage parenchyma of stems and bulbs. In amyloplasts (a type of leucoplast that stores starch), the shape is determined by the number and arrangement of starch grains: with one large grain they resemble a spindle; with many small grains they remain round (Carde, 1984, cited in Evert, 2006; Choi et al., 2021).
Chemical composition. Leucoplasts contain practically no pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids). Their stroma contains:
-
starch synthesis enzymes (ADP‑glucose pyrophosphorylase, starch synthases, branching enzyme);
-
fatty acid synthesis enzymes (acetyl‑CoA carboxylase, FAS complex);
-
storage proteins (in proteinoplasts);
-
their own plastome, 70S ribosomes, although their transcriptional activity is lower than in chloroplasts;
-
lipids (15–25% of dry mass), predominantly from the membrane pool.
Starch (up to 50–70% of dry mass in potato tuber amyloplasts) is a mixture of amylose and amylopectin. Lipids in elaioplasts accumulate as triacylglycerols (oils) (Evert, 2006; Sierra et al., 2023).
Functions and varieties. Leucoplasts perform three main functions depending on specialization (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Choi et al., 2021):
-
Amyloplasts – starch storage. Found in tubers (potato), root crops (cassava, sweet potato), cereal endosperm (wheat, rice, maize), legumes, and also in statoliths – specialized cells of the root cap, where amyloplasts act as sensors for gravitropism. The shape of starch grains is species‑specific and is used for flour microdiagnostics.
-
Elaioplasts (oleoplasts) – synthesis and accumulation of lipids (oils) in oilseed crop seeds (sunflower, rapeseed, flax, olive, avocado), as well as in pollen grains (exine formation involves elaioplasts) and in citrus secretory structures.
-
Proteinoplasts – accumulation of storage proteins. Characteristic of the aleurone layer of cereal endosperm (wheat, maize, rice) and some legume seeds. Proteins in them often form crystalloids or amorphous inclusions.
In the same species, different tissues may develop different types of leucoplasts, and in some cases a leucoplast can store two types of substances simultaneously (e.g., starch and protein in maize endosperm) (Evert, 2006; Sadali et al., 2019).
For the agronomist, leucoplasts have direct economic importance:
-
Potato yield is 75–80% determined by the starch of amyloplasts.
-
Oil content of seeds depends on the number and size of elaioplasts.
-
Protein content of cereal grain is associated with the development of proteinoplasts in the aleurone layer.
Constituent elements (substructure). Like all plastids, leucoplasts are surrounded by two membranes (outer and inner). The thylakoid system is completely absent (or represented by single vesicles). The stroma contains:
-
one or more starch grains (in amyloplasts) – grains can be simple (one growth point) or compound (many crystallization centers); a thin layer of stroma remains around the grains;
-
plastoglobuli (rare, small);
-
fibrillar structures (in proteinoplasts – storage protein deposits as crystalloids or amorphous masses);
-
lipid droplets in elaioplasts (without a surrounding membrane, unlike cytoplasmic lipid bodies);
-
own DNA (plastome) and 70S ribosomes – although their number is smaller than in chloroplasts, biosynthetic activity is retained (especially fatty acid synthesis);
-
glycolytic enzymes and oxidative pentose phosphate pathway enzymes (providing reducing equivalents for starch and fatty acid synthesis) (Evert, 2006; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Interconversions. Leucoplasts have a high potential for transformation:
-
Upon illumination, amyloplasts of potato tubers or root crops can turn into chloroplasts (the “greening” process, leading to accumulation of toxic solanines and requiring storage in the dark).
-
In leaves growing in the dark, proplastids turn into etioplasts, not into leucoplasts.
-
During fruit ripening and petal senescence, amyloplasts can transform into chromoplasts (e.g., in banana fruits) (Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006).
Leucoplasts are not passive storage depots. They actively participate in regulation of carbohydrate metabolism: in amyloplasts, starch is hydrolyzed to glucose and maltose, which are exported to the cytosol via specific transporters. In storage tissues, leucoplasts form a network with the endoplasmic reticulum and vacuole, coordinating synthesis, storage, and mobilization of reserves (Zeeman et al., 2010, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Special cases. In some plants, transitional forms between leucoplasts and other plastids exist:
-
Amylochromoplasts – contain both starch grains and carotenoid crystals (in pumpkin fruits, peach palm, sweet potato).
-
Leucoplasts can differentiate into chromoplasts during fruit ripening (carrot, cauliflower) (Choi et al., 2021; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
Significance for agricultural science. Leucoplasts are key organelles for yield accumulation (starch, oils, proteins). Breeding for increased size and number of amyloplasts (potato, cereals), elaioplasts (rapeseed, sunflower), and proteinoplasts (wheat, maize) is a direct route to enhancing productivity. Understanding the mechanisms of leucoplast‑to‑chloroplast conversion is important for preventing tuber greening during storage and for managing root crop quality.
2.4. Proplastids
Shape, size, and position in the cell. Proplastids are the smallest and least differentiated of all plastid types. They have a rounded, ovoid, or amoeboid shape, typically 0.5–1.0 μm in diameter (rarely up to 1.5 μm). Proplastids are formed in meristematic tissues – root and shoot apical meristems, cambium, and in the seed embryo. In a dividing cell, proplastids are evenly distributed between daughter cells during mitosis. They can also be found in some differentiated cells that retain the ability to dedifferentiate (e.g., in cortex parenchyma upon wounding) (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006; Sadali et al., 2019).
Chemical composition. Proplastids are colorless, containing no chlorophyll; carotenoids are present only in traces (usually < 0.1% dry mass). The dry matter consists mainly of:
-
proteins (40–45%) – DNA replication, transcription, translation enzymes, as well as import proteins (TIC/TOC complexes);
-
lipids (20–25%) – mainly phospholipids of the double membrane;
-
nucleic acids (5–10%) – plastome (several copies of circular DNA per organelle), RNA;
-
small amounts of starch (rarely), no pigments or thylakoid proteins.
Energy metabolism of proplastids is maintained by oxidation of sugars imported from the cytosol; they do not photosynthesize nor store significant amounts of substances (Kirk & Tilney‑Bassett, 1978, cited in Evert, 2006; Sadali et al., 2019).
Functions. Proplastids perform a single but fundamental function – biogenesis of all plastid types. Depending on signals (light, tissue‑specific factors, hormones, developmental stage), a proplastid differentiates into:
-
chloroplast (upon illumination in green tissues),
-
chromoplast (in flowers and fruits, usually via the chloroplast stage),
-
leucoplast (in storage organs, in the dark),
-
etioplast (in leaves growing in complete darkness).
In addition, proplastids are capable of autonomous division (binary fission), ensuring an increase in plastid number during cell and tissue growth. The rate of proplastid division is highest in meristems and decreases as the cell differentiates. Thus, proplastids are the “mother form” that maintains the plastid genome across cell generations (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Choi et al., 2021).
For agricultural science, understanding proplastids is important because:
-
Plastid inheritance (in most flowering plants – maternal) is determined by the fate of proplastids in the egg cell and fertilization.
-
Clonal propagation of crops (potato, fruit, ornamental) preserves the plastid type of the original plant precisely due to proplastid division in meristems.
-
Genetic engineering often uses proplastid transformation (e.g., in tissue culture), yielding stable transgenic lines with high expression levels (plant “plastid factories” for protein and carotenoid synthesis) (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Sadali et al., 2019).
Constituent elements (substructure). Proplastids are surrounded by two membranes (outer and inner), which already contain TOC and TIC translocators (translocon at the outer/inner chloroplast envelope), ready to import nuclear‑encoded proteins. The internal space – stroma – is filled with a fine‑grained matrix. The thylakoid system is completely absent. In the stroma one can distinguish:
-
circular DNA (2–10 copies per proplastid), bound to bacterial‑like proteins;
-
70S ribosomes (prokaryotic type);
-
small vesicles or tubular structures – primordia of internal membranes that will develop into thylakoids or degrade;
-
fibrillar bodies – presumably iron stores (ferritin‑like) (Evert, 2006; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
It is important to emphasize that proplastids are not passive precursors but actively dividing and metabolizing organelles. They maintain their own genome in a replication‑competent state and are sensitive to light and hormonal signals that switch their differentiation. During aging or stress, can proplastids also form de novo from more differentiated plastids? No, the reverse pathway does not exist: highly specialized chromoplasts and mature leucoplasts do not revert to proplastids. Therefore, maintaining the proplastid population in meristems is critically important for perennial agricultural crops (fruit, berry, grape, forage grasses) (Thomson & Whatley, 1980, cited in Sadali et al., 2019; Sierra et al., 2023).
Division of proplastids. The mechanism of proplastid division resembles bacterial division and involves the protein FtsZ (homolog of bacterial cell division protein). In the proplastid stroma, an FtsZ ring forms, to which additional proteins (ARC6, PARC6, PDV1, PDV2) then assemble on the inner and outer membranes. This ensures accurate organelle division. Proplastid division is coordinated with the cell cycle: in meristems they divide approximately synchronously with the cell, whereas in differentiating tissues their division may continue after the cell has ceased dividing (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006).
Significance for biotechnology. Proplastids are ideal targets for plastome transformation because they:
-
are easily transformed by microprojectile bombardment;
-
homologous recombination in the plastome allows precise insertion of transgenes;
-
absence of positional effect and high gene copy number enable overexpression (up to 20–40% of total soluble cell protein);
-
maternal inheritance of plastids prevents transgene spread via pollen (biocontainment) (Maliga, 2004, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Sadali et al., 2019).
On this basis, proplastids are used for the production of recombinant proteins (vaccines, antibodies, enzymes) as well as for biofortification (carotenoid enrichment).
2.5. Etioplasts
Shape, size, and position in the cell. Etioplasts (from Greek etióo – to become pale, to languish) are an intermediate plastid form that arises from proplastids in etiolated seedlings of higher plants grown in complete darkness (or in tissues deprived of light). Etioplasts are round or oval in shape, 1.5–3 μm in size. In cells typical of etiolated grass leaves (wheat, barley, maize) or dicotyledons (pea, bean), etioplasts can occupy up to 20–30% of the cytoplasm volume. Upon illumination, they very rapidly (within 2–6 hours) transform into normal chloroplasts, making them an important model for studying the biogenesis of the photosynthetic apparatus (Boardman, 1968, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; López‑Juez, 2007; Evert, 2006).
Chemical composition. Etioplasts lack chlorophyll but contain protochlorophyllide (a chlorophyll precursor) in a protein‑bound form. Protochlorophyllide gives etioplasts a faint yellow‑orange tint (hence the name “etiolated” – pale). Composition by major components:
-
proteins (40–45%) – chlorophyll biosynthesis enzymes (including NADPH‑protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase, POR), import proteins, ribosomal proteins;
-
lipids (20–30%) – mainly galactolipids and phospholipids of the prolamellar body membranes;
-
protochlorophyllide (0.1–0.5%) in complex with POR protein;
-
carotenoids (traces, mainly lutein and violaxanthin);
-
own plastome, 70S ribosomes (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Choi et al., 2021).
Starch is usually absent in etioplasts or occurs in microquantities. The stroma also contains small plastoglobuli.
Functions. Etioplasts do not photosynthesize. Their main function is “waiting for light”. In the dark, they accumulate the enzyme NADPH‑protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR) and its substrate – protochlorophyllide. Upon the first exposure to light, the following occurs:
-
photochemical reduction of protochlorophyllide to chlorophyllide (followed by esterification to chlorophyll a);
-
rapid disassembly of the prolamellar body;
-
formation of thylakoid membranes and grana;
-
activation of chlorophyll b and carotenoid synthesis;
-
assembly of light‑harvesting complexes.
Thus, etioplasts are a specialized, adaptive form for survival in the dark, allowing the plant to “instantly” (within hours) begin photosynthesis upon emerging into the light. Without such preparation, chlorophyll synthesis in the dark would be impossible due to the lack of light required for protochlorophyllide reduction (Reinbothe et al., 2010, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Choi et al., 2021).
Constituent elements (substructure). Etioplasts are surrounded by a double membrane. Their stroma contains a unique structure – the prolamellar body (PLB) – a regular three‑dimensional cubic lattice of membrane tubules (tubule diameter ~20 nm), composed mainly of lipids and POR‑protochlorophyllide complexes. Adjacent to the prolamellar body are prolamellar membranes (or proplastid thylakoids) – small flattened membrane vesicles that, upon illumination, turn into primary thylakoids and then into grana (Gunning, 2001, cited in Evert, 2006; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
The stroma also contains:
-
circular DNA (plastome) with high transcriptional activity;
-
70S ribosomes;
-
small plastoglobuli;
-
storage proteins (in small amounts).
Upon illumination, the prolamellar body rapidly (within 1–2 hours) disassembles, and its lipids and proteins are rearranged into thylakoid membranes. This process is one of the most striking models of membrane biogenesis in plant cells (Sundqvist & Dahlin, 1997, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Development. Under natural conditions, etioplasts form from proplastids in seed embryos germinating in the dark (under a soil layer). As soon as the seedling reaches the surface and is illuminated, etioplasts rapidly transform into chloroplasts. If the plant remains in the dark for a prolonged period (several weeks), etioplasts may undergo degeneration: the prolamellar body loses order, POR content decreases, and the plastids become unable to green normally (López‑Juez, 2007; Choi et al., 2021).
Regulation. Etioplast formation is controlled by repressors of photomorphogenesis – DET1, COP1 proteins, and PIF transcription factors (phytochrome‑interacting factors). In the dark, these repressors are active, and chloroplast development is blocked at the etioplast stage. Upon illumination, PIFs are degraded and COP1 is inactivated, triggering chloroplast differentiation (Choi et al., 2021; Altamura et al., 2024).
Significance for agricultural science. Although under field conditions fully developed etioplasts are rare (except in seedlings pushing through a thick soil layer or under mulch), understanding the etioplast stage is important for:
-
seed production – when germinating seeds in the dark (e.g., when testing germination in rolled paper towels), etioplasts form, and subsequent illumination causes “greening”, indicating seedling viability;
-
weed control – weed seedlings emerging from soil pass through an etioplast stage that is particularly sensitive to certain herbicides (e.g., norflurazon, which inhibits carotenoid synthesis necessary for prolamellar body formation);
-
storage physiology – in storage organs stored in the dark (onion, potato), etioplasts do not usually form (amyloplasts develop there), but during bud sprouting on tubers in the dark, etioplasts can be observed in young etiolated shoots (Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006).
Brief summary. Etioplasts are a transient, strictly dark‑adapted form that does not exist in nature under normal illumination, but is extremely useful for experimental plant biology (study of thylakoid biogenesis, role of carotenoids in membrane formation) and for understanding light regulation of plastid development.
Summary Table: Types of Plastids in Higher Plants
Below is a summarizing table that systematizes the key features of different plastid types, their substructure, functions, and examples of tissues. The table is based on information from the cited sources (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006; Choi et al., 2021; Sierra et al., 2023; Sadali et al., 2019; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026; Altamura et al., 2024).
| Plastid type | Shape and size | Pigments / color | Main functions | Substructure | Typical tissues / examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proplastid | Rounded, 0.5–1.0 μm | Colorless (traces of carotenoids) | Biogenesis of all plastid types; division | Two membranes, stroma, vesicles, DNA, 70S ribosomes | Meristems (root and shoot apices), seed embryo |
| Etioplast | Rounded, 1.5–3 μm | Yellow‑orange (protochlorophyllide) | Light anticipation; rapid conversion to chloroplast upon illumination | Prolamellar body (cubic lattice), adjacent membrane vesicles | Etiolated seedlings (in darkness) |
| Chloroplast | Lens‑shaped, 5–10 × 2–4 μm | Green (chlorophylls a, b, carotenoids) | Photosynthesis, fatty acid synthesis, amino acids, isoprenoids, retrograde signaling | Two membranes, grana (thylakoid stacks), stroma thylakoids, stroma with starch grains, DNA, 70S ribosomes, plastoglobuli | Leaf mesophyll, green parts of stems |
| Chromoplast (general) | Diverse (spherical, needle‑like, crystal‑like), 3–7 μm | Yellow, orange, red (carotenoids: β‑carotene, lycopene, xanthophylls) | Attraction (fruit/flower color), carotenoid storage | Two membranes, thylakoids absent, many plastoglobuli, sometimes carotenoid crystals or tubules | Ripening fruits (tomato, pepper), petals (buttercup), root crops (carrot) |
| — Globular chromoplast | Rounded | Carotenoid droplets | Storage in plastoglobuli | Numerous plastoglobuli | Buttercup petals, yellow pepper |
| — Membranous chromoplast | Rounded or oval | Concentric membranes | Formation of carotenoid membranes | Up to 20 concentric (paired) membranes | Narcissus petals, citrus |
| — Tubular chromoplast | Spindle‑shaped | Fibrils or tubules | Structuring of carotenoids | Lipoprotein tubules | Red pepper, rose hip |
| — Crystalline chromoplast | Irregular, angular | Carotene crystals | Maximal compaction of carotenoids | Crystals of β‑carotene or lycopene | Carrot, tomato |
| Leucoplast (general) | Rounded or amoeboid, 1–3 μm | Colorless | Storage, fatty acid synthesis | Two membranes, thylakoids absent, stroma with enzymes | Storage tissues (roots, tubers, seeds, endosperm) |
| — Amyloplast | Spindle‑shaped or rounded (depends on number of starch grains) | Colorless | Starch storage; gravitropism (statoliths) | One or several starch grains, rare plastoglobuli | Potato tubers, root crops, cereal endosperm, root cap statoliths |
| — Elaioplast | Rounded | Colorless | Synthesis and storage of oils (triacylglycerols) | Lipid droplets in stroma, often without a surrounding membrane | Oilseed crop seeds (rapeseed, sunflower, flax), pollen grains, citrus secretory structures |
| — Proteinoplast | Rounded or with crystalloid inclusions | Colorless | Storage protein accumulation | Protein crystals or amorphous masses in stroma | Aleurone layer of cereal endosperm (wheat, maize), legume seeds |
| Gerentoplast | Irregular, deformed | Yellowish‑brown (carotenoids, breakdown products) | Nutrient reutilization during senescence | Degraded thylakoids, enlarged plastoglobuli, degraded envelope | Senescing leaves, inner seed integument (jatropha) |
| Iridoplast (lamelloplast) | Flattened, with ordered lamellae | Green (chlorophyll) + structural color | Enhanced light capture efficiency in shade | Thylakoids with regular interlamellar spacing (photonic crystal) | Begonia leaf epidermis, Selaginella under shaded conditions |
| Sensory plastid (SEP) | Small (smaller than chloroplasts), rounded | Pale green (little chlorophyll) | Perception of pathogens, abiotic stresses, formation of stromules | Poorly developed grana, numerous stromules, variable shape | Epidermal cells (pavement cells), phloem parenchyma |
Notes on the table:
-
The etioplast is not an independent permanent type, but a dark‑adapted intermediate form between proplastid and chloroplast.
-
Leucoplasts are often referred to by a collective term, and their functional varieties are given specifying names (amyloplast, elaioplast, proteinoplast).
-
Sizes and shapes of plastids can vary depending on plant species, tissue type, physiological state of the cell, and environmental conditions.
-
Iridoplasts and sensory plastids (SEP) are relatively recently described specialized types; their functions and distribution are still being actively studied.
3. Plastid Interconversions

Scheme of transitions between different plastid types in a plant cell.
Proplastids differentiate into chloroplasts, etioplasts, leucoplasts, and chromoplasts. Reverse transitions are possible (e.g., leucoplast → chloroplast upon greening of tubers). In most crops, chromoplasts are irreversible. Choi H., Yi T., Ha S.-H. (2021), figure 1, <a class="common-share-detail" rel='nofollow' href='https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/' aria-label='Common Share CC BY 4.0' target='_blank'>CC BY 4.0</a>.
One of the unique features of the plastid apparatus in higher plants is the ability of plastids to switch from one type to another depending on tissue differentiation, light conditions, hormonal signals, and organ developmental stage. These transformations are possible because all plastids originate from a common precursor – the proplastid – and their genome (plastome) remains stable, while the proteome and ultrastructure are remodeled under the influence of nuclear-encoded factors (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Sierra et al., 2023). At the basis of interconversions lie changes in the expression of nuclear and plastid genes, remodeling of the membrane system, and changes in pigment composition (Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006). The main transformation pathways confirmed experimentally for higher plants are presented below.
3.1. Proplastid → chloroplast (main “greening” pathway)
The best-studied pathway. In leaf cells in the light, the proplastid receives signals (via phytochromes, cryptochromes, retrograde signals from the plastids themselves) that trigger:
-
massive synthesis of chlorophylls and carotenoids;
-
formation of thylakoid membranes (first from proplastid vesicles, then packing into grana);
-
activation of genes encoding photosystem proteins (Rubisco, LHC, cytochrome b6f);
-
increase in plastome copy number and ribosomes.
The process takes from several hours (in seedlings) to several days (in slow‑growing tissues). This pathway is characteristic of all green organs and forms the basis of photosynthetic activity in plants (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006; Choi et al., 2021).
3.2. Proplastid → etioplast (dark alternative)
In leaves growing in complete darkness, proplastids turn not into chloroplasts but into etioplasts. The leaf meristem is programmed to become a chloroplast, but the absence of light blocks the final stages of chlorophyll biosynthesis. As a result, protochlorophyllide accumulates and a prolamellar body (PLB) forms. Upon illumination, the etioplast rapidly converts into a chloroplast (see 3.6). This pathway is widely used in experimental physiology to study thylakoid biogenesis (López‑Juez, 2007; Choi et al., 2021).
3.3. Proplastid → leucoplast
In tissues developing in the dark (roots, tubers, endosperm) or in the light but genetically programmed for storage, proplastids differentiate into leucoplasts (amyloplasts, elaioplasts, proteinoplasts). Signals include low light levels, high sugar concentrations, and tissue‑specific transcription factors. During this process:
-
chlorophyll synthesis is suppressed (though biosynthetic genes may remain repressed);
-
enzymes for starch synthesis (ADP‑glucose pyrophosphorylase, starch synthase) or lipid synthesis (acetyl‑CoA carboxylase) are induced;
-
thylakoids do not form; the membrane system is limited to the two envelopes and occasional single vesicles.
In potato tubers, amyloplasts form from proplastids in stolons during tuber initiation; this process is regulated by the phytohormone gibberellin (inhibits) and abscisic acid (activates) (Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006; Sierra et al., 2023).
3.4. Proplastid → chromoplast (direct pathway)
In some fruits (watermelon, papaya) and in carrot callus, chromoplasts develop directly from proplastids, bypassing the chloroplast stage. In these cases, carotenoids accumulate without prior formation of the photosynthetic apparatus (Choi et al., 2021; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
3.5. Etioplast → chloroplast (light‑dependent transition)
The fastest and most thoroughly studied transition. When etiolated seedlings are illuminated:
-
light activates protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR), reducing protochlorophyllide to chlorophyllide;
-
the prolamellar body disassembles, its membranes rearrange into thylakoids;
-
within 4–6 hours, grana form and full photosynthesis is initiated.
The process depends on the activity of carotenoid biosynthesis enzymes (carotenes are necessary for PLB formation). In mutants with defects in carotenoid synthesis, etioplasts either do not form or cannot differentiate normally (Choi et al., 2021; Evert, 2006).
3.6. Chloroplast → chromoplast (fruit ripening and senescence)
Classic examples include ripening of tomato, pepper, citrus fruits, as well as petal senescence and autumn leaves. The process involves:
-
chlorophyll degradation (activation of chlorophyllase and pheophorbide pathway enzymes);
-
breakdown of thylakoid membranes with release of lipids;
-
enhanced synthesis of carotenoids (especially lycopene and β‑carotene) via the plastidial isoprenoid pathway (MEP);
-
accumulation of carotenoids in plastoglobuli and/or crystalline structures;
-
reduction of photosynthetic enzymes.
This transformation is irreversible in most crops (tomato, pepper, carrot). However, in some species (citrus, cucumber, pumpkin) the reverse process – regreening (chromoplast → chloroplast) – is possible under certain conditions (blue light irradiation, removal of the fruit from the plant) (Choi et al., 2021; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026; Sadali et al., 2019).
3.7. Chloroplast → leucoplast (amyloplast)
Occurs in storage organs when a green organ switches to starch accumulation. The best‑studied example is the potato tuber. In young stolons, cells contain chloroplasts; as the stolon thickens and the tuber initiates, they lose chlorophyll, break down thylakoids, and turn into amyloplasts that accumulate up to 80% of dry mass as starch. Similarly, during legume seed maturation, chloroplasts of the seed coats turn into amyloplasts or proteinoplasts (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006; Choi et al., 2021).
3.8. Leucoplast → chloroplast (greening of storage organs)
Possible in tissues that initially developed in the dark or as storage organs but are then exposed to light. Classic examples:
-
greening of potato tubers during storage in the light (amyloplasts turn into chloroplasts, accumulating chlorophyll and toxic solanines);
-
greening of carrot, radish roots if they emerge from the soil;
-
greening of cereal endosperm during germination in the light.
In these cases, starch in leucoplasts is hydrolyzed, thylakoid membranes form anew, and chlorophylls and carotenoids are synthesized. This pathway is reversible: upon return to darkness, chloroplasts may re‑differentiate into leucoplasts (but the process is usually incomplete) (Evert, 2006; Choi et al., 2021).
3.9. Leucoplast → chromoplast
Occurs in carrot roots (white roots contain amyloplasts, orange ones – chromoplasts), in the cauliflower Orange mutant (leucoplasts of inflorescences turn into chromoplasts with high β‑carotene content), and in the endosperm of transgenic rice and maize upon overexpression of carotenogenesis genes (Choi et al., 2021; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
3.10. Chromoplast → chloroplast (rare cases)
In the vast majority of plants, chromoplasts are terminally differentiated and do not turn into chloroplasts. Exceptions:
-
some fruits (orange, peach) may accumulate chlorophyll in the peel under prolonged illumination, but this occurs not by reverse conversion of chromoplasts but by division of proplastids and formation of new chloroplasts;
-
petals of some flowers (e.g., Caltha species) turn green after pollination – here, chromoplasts may re‑acquire thylakoids, but details remain unclear;
-
regreening of citrus under blue light treatment is the best‑documented but still rare case (Choi et al., 2021; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
For agricultural practice, it is important that the color of fruits of most crops (tomato, pepper, carrot) is irreversible, so green fruits harvested unripe do not ripen to a bright color after harvest – the chloroplast‑to‑chromoplast transition requires an intact plant and photosynthetically active leaves.
3.11. Chloroplast → gerontoplast (senescence)
During natural leaf senescence or under stress, chloroplasts turn into gerontoplasts – plastids with a degraded thylakoid system, enlarged plastoglobuli, and accumulation of lipophilic breakdown products. This process is irreversible and is aimed at reutilizing nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus) from disassembled membranes and proteins. Gerontoplasts cannot revert to chloroplasts (Choi et al., 2021; Altamura et al., 2024).
3.12. Biological significance of interconversions
The ability of plastids to change their type allows the plant to:
-
use resources economically (photosynthesis in the green leaf, storage in the tuber, attraction in the fruit);
-
adapt to changing light conditions (etioplast → chloroplast in seedlings);
-
redistribute carbon and nitrogen depending on the season (in autumn, leaf chloroplasts turn into chromoplast‑like gerontoplasts with nitrogen reutilization).
Plastid interconversions are not chaotic but strictly regulated processes involving nuclear genes (e.g., the GLK, GATA, RIN, NOR, OR transcription factor families) and plastid signals (redox status, tetrapyrrole accumulation, carotenoids). Understanding these pathways opens opportunities for biotechnological control over ripening timing, fruit quality, and stress tolerance of crop plants (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026; Choi et al., 2021).
4. Biogenesis and Dynamic Processes
Plastid biogenesis (the process of their formation, growth, division, and differentiation) and dynamic processes (intracellular movement, protein exchange, genome replication) form the basis of plastid function throughout the life of the plant cell. Unlike most eukaryotic organelles, plastids are not created anew in each cell but arise only by division of pre‑existing plastids (the principle “omnis plastida e plastida”). This principle was experimentally demonstrated as early as the 19th century and later confirmed at the molecular level (Whatley, 1978; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
4.1. Origin of Plastids in the Cell Cycle
Meristematic cells contain proplastids – small (0.5–1.0 μm) organelles with an underdeveloped membrane system. Before cell division, proplastids replicate their DNA and divide by binary fission, after which the daughter proplastids are distributed between daughter cells during mitosis (usually evenly, although cases of asymmetric distribution leading to cytoplasmic hereditary heterogeneity are known). The number of proplastids per cell is maintained with high precision; in Arabidopsis thaliana root meristem there are about 10–20 proplastids per cell, in tobacco up to 50 (Pyke & Leech, 1994, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
The process of plastid division involves three stages:
-
Plastome replication – the circular plastid DNA is replicated using its own DNA polymerases (of the bacterial DNA polymerase III type) and several auxiliary proteins encoded by the nucleus.
-
Division – carried out by ring structures: an inner ring (FtsZ protein – homolog of bacterial cell division protein) on the inner membrane and an outer ring (ARC5, PARC6, PDV1/2 proteins) on the outer membrane. FtsZ forms the Z‑ring, to which other factors attach, ensuring plastid constriction.
-
Segregation – separation of the two daughter plastids, each receiving at least one copy of the plastome (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006; Miyagishima, 2011, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
4.2. Differentiation of Proplastids (Biogenesis of Specialized Plastids)
As the cell exits the meristem and begins differentiation, proplastids, under the influence of signals (light, hormones, metabolic signals), transform into chloroplasts, leucoplasts, chromoplasts, or etioplasts (for details see sections 2 and 3). This process requires:
-
coordinated expression of nuclear and plastid genes – the nucleus supplies the vast majority of plastid proteins (about 3000 types, including photosystem proteins, starch synthesis enzymes, components of the translational apparatus); the plastid genome encodes only about 100 proteins (mainly subunits of photosynthetic complexes and ribosomal proteins);
-
protein import across the envelope – via translocons of the outer (TOC) and inner (TIC) membranes (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Renna et al., 2026).
Import mechanism: the protein precursor is synthesized on cytoplasmic ribosomes with an N‑terminal signal peptide (transit peptide), binds to TOC receptors, and moves through a channel into the stroma, where the signal peptide is cleaved off by signal peptidase. More than 95% of plastid proteins are imported by this pathway (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Renna et al., 2026; Evert, 2006).
4.3. Regulation of Protein Import by the Ubiquitin‑Proteasome System (UPS)
The level of protein import into plastids is dynamically regulated. A crucial mechanism is ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of TOC complex components by the membrane‑anchored E3 ubiquitin ligase SP1 (Suppressor of ppi1 locus 1). SP1 is localized on the outer plastid membrane and, upon certain signals (e.g., during plastid type switching), marks TOC receptors (Toc159, Toc33) for destruction by the 26S proteasome in the cytosol. This allows switching of import from a “photosynthetic” set of proteins to a “non‑photosynthetic” one and vice versa, which is necessary for plastid interconversions (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Sadali et al., 2019; Ling et al., 2012, cited in Sadali et al., 2019).
4.4. Plastid Dynamics in the Cell
Plastids are not static organelles. They are capable of movement (taxis) along actin microfilaments with the involvement of motor proteins (myosins). Plastid movement has physiological significance:
-
phototaxis – in leaf cells under low light, chloroplasts accumulate along walls perpendicular to the incident rays (to capture maximum light); under bright light, they orient along walls parallel to the incident light or move deeper into the cell (to avoid photodamage). This phenomenon is described as chloroplast avoidance/accumulation responses in higher plants (Wada et al., 2003, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006).
-
cyclosis (cytoplasmic streaming) passively carries plastids, but they can temporarily attach to actin filaments.
-
formation of stromules – stroma‑filled tubular protrusions that can connect plastids to each other or to the nucleus. Stromules are especially numerous in sensory plastids of the epidermis and phloem and participate in retrograde signaling under stress (Altamura et al., 2024; Renna et al., 2026; Sierra et al., 2023).
4.5. Renewal and Repair (Membrane and Protein Dynamics)
Thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts are continuously renewed: photosystems (especially photosystem II) undergo repair after light damage (the D1 protein degrades and is resynthesized every 30–60 minutes). Plastoglobuli serve as reservoirs for lipids, tocopherols, and quinones, and participate in isoprenoid synthesis. Within the stroma, starch turnover is constant: during the day it is synthesized from assimilates, at night it is hydrolyzed to sugars that are exported to the cytosol. In storage‑type amyloplasts, starch accumulates up to a certain limit, but during seed or tuber germination, its mobilization begins (Zeeman et al., 2010, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006).
4.6. Replication and Inheritance of the Plastome
Each plastid contains 10–100 copies of a circular DNA molecule (length 120 to 160 kb in higher plants). In young cells (meristems), the number of DNA copies per plastid is low, but during differentiation, especially in chloroplasts, copy number increases by endoreplication (up to 1000–10000 copies per cell in leaf mesophyll). The plastome contains about 110–130 genes encoding: components of photosystems (psa, psb), cytochrome complex (pet), ATP synthase (atp), ribosomal proteins (rpl, rps), tRNAs, and some other proteins (e.g., the large subunit of Rubisco; the small subunit is nuclear‑encoded).
Inheritance of plastids in most flowering plants is maternal (mitotic): plastids of the egg cell are transmitted to the offspring, while plastids of sperm cells usually do not enter the zygote or are degraded. This is important for breeding: traits encoded by the plastome (e.g., resistance to some herbicides) are transmitted only through the maternal line. In conifers and some flowering plants (e.g., Pelargonium), biparental (bilateral) inheritance has been described (Birky, 1995, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006).
4.7. Plastids as a Signaling Platform: Retrograde Signaling
Plastids constantly monitor their status (oxidative stress level, energy charge, tetrapyrrole concentration, integrity of the photosynthetic apparatus) and send signals to the nucleus – this mechanism is called retrograde signaling. Signaling molecules include reactive oxygen species (singlet oxygen, H2O2), 3′‑phosphoadenosine‑5′‑phosphate (PAP), β‑cyclocitral, methylerythritol cyclodiphosphate (MEcPP), heme, and others. These signals modulate the expression of nuclear genes, adapting the cell to drought, salinity, high or low light, and pathogens (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Altamura et al., 2024; Sierra et al., 2023).
A key integrator of retrograde signals is the protein GUN1 (Genomes Uncoupled 1), located in plastids. Mutations in GUN1 disrupt retrograde signaling and render plants unable to properly regulate the expression of nuclear photosynthetic genes (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Pogson et al., 2015).
4.8. Plastid Degradation and Plastid Recycling
During cell aging or programmed cell death, plastids are degraded in two stages:
-
first, fragmentation of internal membranes and export of metabolites (proteins, lipids, pigments) to the cytosol or vacuole;
-
then, the organelle remnants enter the vacuole by microautophagy (for small plastids) or macroautophagy (for large chloroplasts wrapped in an autophagosome membrane).
This process is especially intense during fruit ripening (destruction of chloroplasts during transition to chromoplasts is not complete degradation – the envelope and DNA are retained) and during leaf senescence. Released amino acids and sugars are transported to younger parts of the plant (Hörtensteiner & Kräutler, 2011; Izumi et al., 2017, cited in Altamura et al., 2024; Choi et al., 2021).
4.9. Biogenesis In Vitro and Biotechnological Significance
Understanding plastid biogenesis is used for:
-
plastid transformation (biolistics) – introducing transgenes into the plastome, yielding high expression levels (up to 20–40% of total soluble protein) and no positional effect. Plastid transformation is indispensable for obtaining plants that synthesize recombinant proteins (vaccines, antibodies, enzymes) and valuable metabolites (carotenoids, vitamins).
-
regulation of ripening and storage – for example, suppressing greening of potato tubers by inhibiting the conversion of amyloplasts to chloroplasts.
-
creating herbicide‑resistant crops – expressing mutant versions of target genes in plastids (e.g., EPSPS for glyphosate resistance) (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Sadali et al., 2019; Choi et al., 2021).
5. Differences from Animal, Fungal, and Prokaryotic Cells
Plastids are a unique feature of the plant cell (as well as cells of algae and some protists that entered endosymbiosis with algae). Their absence is a key diagnostic trait that distinguishes plants from animals, fungi, and most prokaryotes. The main comparative characteristics are given below, based on the sources (Evert, 2006; Renna et al., 2026; Sierra et al., 2023; Yakovlev et al., 2008; Serebryakova et al., 2006; Andreeva & Rodman, 2002).
5.1. Comparison with Animal Cells
| Trait | Plant cell | Animal cell |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of plastids | Present (proplastids, chloroplasts, chromoplasts, leucoplasts) | Absent |
| Type of energy metabolism | Photosynthesis (in chloroplasts) + respiration (in mitochondria) | Respiration only (mitochondria) |
| Starch storage | In amyloplasts (intracellular) | Animals store glycogen in the cytosol (not in organelles) |
| Fatty acid synthesis | In plastids (and also in the endoplasmic reticulum) | In the cytosol (fatty acid synthesis is not compartmentalized into specialized organelles) |
| Ability for autonomous genome replication | Plastids have their own DNA and divide independently; the nucleus controls most proteins | Mitochondria have their own DNA (homologous to bacterial), but no plastids |
| Presence of cell wall | Present (cellulosic) | Absent |
| Centrioles | Absent in most higher plants | Present |
| Vacuoles | Large central vacuole (up to 90% of cell volume) | Small temporary vacuoles (pinocytic, phagocytic) |
Animal cells never contain plastids and are incapable of photosynthesis. An exception is some sea slugs (e.g., Elysia chlorotica) that temporarily retain plastids from ingested algae (kleptoplasty), but this is an acquired, not hereditary trait (Rumpho et al., 2008, cited in Evert, 2006). Thus, the presence of plastids is one of the main features distinguishing plants from animals at the cellular level (Yakovlev et al., 2008; Serebryakova et al., 2006).
5.2. Comparison with Fungal Cells
| Trait | Plant cell | Fungal cell |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of plastids | Present | Absent |
| Cell wall | Cellulosic | Chitinous (in most) |
| Nutrition | Autotrophic (photosynthesis) or heterotrophic in parasitic plants (but plastids are retained, though reduced) | Strictly heterotrophic (saprotrophs, parasites, symbionts) |
| Storage substance | Starch (in amyloplasts) | Glycogen (in the cytosol) |
| Centrioles | Absent in most | Present in many (in cells at sporulation stages) |
Fungi have neither plastids nor any homologs of them. Even the most primitive fungi (chytridiomycetes, zygomycetes) lack endosymbiotic cyanobacterial precursors. This is one of the most important differences used in systematics to separate fungi from plants. In some parasitic flowering plants (e.g., Rafflesia, Monotropa), plastids are retained, although they lose photosynthetic function (genome reduction, loss of thylakoids). In fungi, however, plastids are absent even in a reduced form (Yakovlev et al., 2008; Serebryakova et al., 2006; Andreeva & Rodman, 2002).
5.3. Comparison with Prokaryotes (Bacteria and Archaea)
| Trait | Plant cell (eukaryotes) | Prokaryotes |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of plastids | Present (surrounded by two membranes) | Absent (no membrane‑bound organelles at all) |
| Photosynthesis | In chloroplasts (highly organized thylakoid system with grana) | In photosynthetic bacteria – in membrane invaginations (chromatophores in purple bacteria) or in thylakoids (cyanobacteria), but there is no double membrane separating the apparatus from the cytoplasm |
| Genome | Plastids have circular DNA (homologous to cyanobacterial) | Circular DNA in the nucleoid |
| Ribosomes | 70S (plastidial) and 80S (cytoplasmic) | 70S (all) |
| Antibiotic sensitivity | Plastids are sensitive to streptomycin, spectinomycin, tetracycline (like bacteria) | Bacteria are sensitive to the same antibiotics |
| Division mechanism | Plastid division involving FtsZ protein (homolog of bacterial FtsZ) | Cell division involving FtsZ (homologous) |
| Cell wall | Cellulosic | Peptidoglycan (murein) |
The most important evolutionary conclusion: plastids are descendants of cyanobacteria, hence their ribosomes, division mechanisms (FtsZ protein), and DNA replication have prokaryotic features. It is on this similarity that the action of some antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin and spectinomycin) is based – they inhibit protein synthesis on plastid ribosomes (70S) without affecting cytoplasmic ribosomes (80S). However, the plant cell as a whole is eukaryotic, and its nuclear genome contains genes inherited from archaea (the informational apparatus) and from alpha‑proteobacteria (mitochondria) (Margulis, 1970; Keeling, 2010; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
5.4. Comparison with Other Eukaryotes That Have Plastids
Plastids are present not only in higher plants but also in:
-
Algae (green, red, brown, diatoms, etc.), however their plastids may have different evolutionary origins (primary endosymbiosis in green and red algae, secondary – in brown algae, diatoms, euglenoids). In higher plants, plastids derive from primary endosymbiosis (as in green algae).
-
Euglenoids – plastids are surrounded by three membranes (result of secondary endosymbiosis with a green alga).
-
Apicomplexan parasites (malaria parasite) – a rudimentary plastid – apicoplast, non‑photosynthetic, but involved in fatty acid and isoprenoid synthesis (McFadden, 2001, cited in Renna et al., 2026).
For agricultural science, it is important that in crop plants, plastids are closest to those of green algae and differ from plastids of other eukaryotes in their pigment set (chlorophylls a and b in higher plants and green algae, whereas brown algae have chlorophylls a and c, red algae have phycobiliproteins). This knowledge is important for herbicide treatments (different algal groups may have different sensitivities to inhibitors of plastid processes) (Evert, 2006; Choi et al., 2021).
5.5. Brief Summary of Differences
-
Animals and fungi – lack plastids, which determines their heterotrophy and absence of photosynthesis. Animal and fungal cells also lack a cell wall (in fungi the wall is chitinous), and the storage substance is glycogen, not starch.
-
Prokaryotes – have no membrane‑bound organelles, therefore photosynthesis in cyanobacteria occurs on invaginations of the plasma membrane (thylakoids), not inside a double‑membrane organelle. However, prokaryotes are similar to plastids in ribosome type (70S), antibiotic sensitivity, and the presence of FtsZ‑dependent division.
-
Plants – the only group of eukaryotes (together with green and red algae) that possess primary plastids derived from an endosymbiotic cyanobacterium.
The presence of plastids is not just a diagnostic trait for distinguishing plants from animals, but also a key reason for differences in metabolism (ability for autotrophy), cellular architecture (need for chlorophylls and thylakoid membranes), and stress responses (e.g., photoinhibition). For the agronomist, understanding these differences is important when developing herbicides (acting selectively on plastids but not on animal cells) and when assessing possibilities for transgenesis (e.g., transfer of plastid genes from plants to animals is impossible under natural conditions) (Yakovlev et al., 2008; Serebryakova et al., 2006; Andreeva & Rodman, 2002; Evert, 2006).
6. Interconnections with Other Parts of the Cell
Plastids are not isolated compartments; they are integrated into a complex network of intracellular interactions, coordinating their work with the nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, peroxisomes, vacuole, cytoskeleton, and plasmodesmata. These interconnections ensure the coordination of metabolism, energy supply, signaling, and stress responses. The main partners of plastids in intracellular communication are discussed below (Renna et al., 2026; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Altamura et al., 2024; Sierra et al., 2023; Evert, 2006).
6.1. Interconnection with the Nucleus (Bidirectional Signaling)
The nucleus and plastids are linked by anterograde (from nucleus to plastids) and retrograde (from plastids to nucleus) signaling.
Anterograde regulation. The nucleus encodes the vast majority of plastid proteins (about 3000 types, including all Calvin cycle enzymes, photosystem components, TIC/TOC import proteins, transcription factors for the plastid genome). Expression of these nuclear genes is controlled by light, phytohormones, and tissue‑specific factors. For example, the GOLDEN2-LIKE (GLK) protein activates transcription of nuclear photosynthesis genes, leading to chloroplast development (Waters et al., 2009, cited in Pogson et al., 2015; Sierra et al., 2023). Photoreceptors (phytochromes, cryptochromes) via cascades of transcription factors (HY5, PIFs) regulate the expression of Photosynthesis‑Associated Nuclear Genes (PhANGs) and sigma factor genes that control plastid genome transcription (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Altamura et al., 2024).
Retrograde signaling. Plastids transmit information about their functional state to the nucleus: oxidative stress level, photosystem performance, tetrapyrrole accumulation, ATP and metabolite levels. Several signaling pathways are known:
-
Tetrapyrrole pathway: heme, synthesized by ferrochelatase 1 (FC1) in plastids, acts as a positive signal promoting expression of nuclear photosynthetic genes. Disruption of tetrapyrrole synthesis (e.g., in gun mutations) blocks this signaling (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
-
Oxidative signal: singlet oxygen (1O2), generated in photosystem II under stress, activates EXECUTER1/2 proteins and induces nuclear stress‑response genes (Kim & Apel, 2013, cited in Altamura et al., 2024).
-
Metabolic signals: 3′‑phosphoadenosine‑5′‑phosphate (PAP), β‑cyclocitral (an oxidation product of β‑carotene), methylerythritol cyclodiphosphate (MEcPP) – all modulate nuclear gene expression via repression of exoribonucleases (XRN) or activation of transcription factors (Estavillo et al., 2011; Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
-
Protein signal: GUN1 (Genomes Uncoupled 1) protein is localized in plastids and serves as an integrator of multiple retrograde signals; gun1 mutations disrupt coordination of nuclear and plastid expression (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Thus, the nucleus and plastids form a single regulatory network essential for photosynthesis, development, and stress adaptation.
6.2. Interconnection with the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER)
The ER and plastids are closely linked by lipid and protein exchange. Lipids synthesized in plastids (e.g., fatty acids) are exported to the ER for incorporation into membranes or synthesis of extraplastidial lipids (phospholipids, sulfolipids). Conversely, some lipids synthesized in the ER (e.g., phosphatidylcholine) enter plastids. This exchange occurs via membrane contact sites (MCS) – regions where the outer plastid membrane and ER membrane come close (distance 10–30 nm), where lipid transfer proteins (TGD complex, VAP27-ORP2A) operate (Renna et al., 2026; Pan et al., 2024; Wang & Benning, 2012, cited in Renna et al., 2026).
Key contact site proteins:
-
VAP27 (VAMP‑associated protein) on the ER membrane and ORP2A (oxysterol‑binding protein) on the outer plastid membrane form a complex regulating homeostasis of lipids (mono‑ and digalactosyldiacylglycerols) and sterols (Renna et al., 2026).
-
TGD1-5 are involved in lipid transport from the ER to plastids (Wang & Benning, 2012, cited in Pan et al., 2024).
In addition, a non‑canonical pathway for protein import into plastids via the ER and Golgi apparatus exists (glycosylated proteins, e.g., α‑amylase, carbonic anhydrase CAH1). These proteins are synthesized on the rough ER, pass through the Golgi, and are then delivered to plastids by vesicular transport (Villarejo et al., 2005; Kitajima et al., 2009; Renna et al., 2026).
6.3. Interconnection with the Golgi Apparatus and Endosomes
Plastids are connected to the Golgi apparatus and the trans‑Golgi network (TGN) via vesicular transport. Glycosylated proteins destined for plastids (NPP1, NPP2, NPP6) pass through the Golgi, where they are modified, and then reach the plastid envelope in vesicles (Nanjo et al., 2006; Kaneko et al., 2016, cited in Renna et al., 2026). Furthermore, endosomes (multivesicular bodies) can interact with plastids, possibly participating in membrane recycling and signaling (Spitzer et al., 2015, cited in Renna et al., 2026; Altamura et al., 2024).
6.4. Interconnection with Mitochondria
Mitochondria and plastids exchange metabolites and energy equivalents. In a leaf during the day, chloroplasts release oxygen and reduce NADP\+ to NADPH, while mitochondria consume oxygen and generate ATP. Several key points of coupling:
-
Photorespiration. In chloroplasts, Rubisco can oxygenate ribulose‑1,5‑bisphosphate to produce phosphoglycolate. Phosphoglycolate is converted to glycolate, which is transported to peroxisomes, and then glycine enters mitochondria, where it is converted to serine with release of CO2. This process returns carbon to the chloroplast but requires the participation of mitochondria and peroxisomes (Bauwe et al., 2010, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Evert, 2006).
-
Organic acid shuttle. Malate and aspartate can be exchanged between chloroplasts and mitochondria to balance redox potential and transfer reducing equivalents (via shuttle systems).
-
Heme synthesis. Heme (a cytochrome precursor) is synthesized partly in plastids and partly in mitochondria, with intermediates (e.g., 5‑aminolevulinic acid in plants is formed in plastids, not in mitochondria, unlike in animals) (Tanaka & Tanaka, 2007, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Plastid‑mitochondria contact sites. In Arabidopsis, an MTL complex (mitochondrial transmembrane lipoprotein) has been described, including AtMic60, OEP7, and OMP24 proteins, which ensures transport of galactoglycerolipids between the organelles (Michaud et al., 2016, cited in Renna et al., 2026). Under phosphate starvation, the number of such contacts increases.
6.5. Interconnection with Peroxisomes
Peroxisomes (microbodies) in plants are closely linked to plastids in photorespiration and reactive oxygen species metabolism. In the photorespiratory cycle, glycolate from the chloroplast enters the peroxisome, where it is oxidized to glyoxylate with the formation of H2O2. Peroxisomal catalase decomposes H2O2. Glyoxylate is then transaminated to glycine, which goes to the mitochondrion. In return, serine exits the mitochondrion, is converted in the peroxisome to hydroxypyruvate and finally to glycerate, which returns to the chloroplast (Huang et al., 1983; Reumann & Weber, 2006, cited in Renna et al., 2026; Evert, 2006).
Peroxisomes and chloroplasts are apposed at a distance of 10–80 nm, and their interaction is mediated by the protein PEX10 (peroxisomal RING protein). In pex10 mutants, contact is disrupted and glycolate metabolism suffers (Schumann et al., 2007, cited in Renna et al., 2026). Optical tweezers have shown that peroxisomes form protrusions (peroxules) that physically connect to chloroplasts, facilitating metabolite transport (Gao et al., 2016, cited in Renna et al., 2026).
6.6. Interconnection with the Vacuole
The vacuole acts as a depot for metabolites synthesized in plastids or the cytosol. During senescence or stress, the vacuole participates in autophagic degradation of plastids: chloroplasts (or their fragments) are surrounded by an autophagosome membrane and transported to the vacuole, where hydrolases break down their components, releasing amino acids and sugars for reutilization (Ishida et al., 2008, cited in Altamura et al., 2024; Izumi et al., 2017, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013). In nectaries, amyloplasts closely adhere to the vacuole and transfer starch grains into it, which are then hydrolyzed to provide energy for nectar secretion (Pacini et al., 2003, cited in Renna et al., 2026).
Anthocyanins and other pigments accumulate in the vacuole, complementing the coloration produced by chromoplasts. The distinction: chromoplasts provide yellow, orange, red hues via carotenoids; anthocyanins in vacuoles give red, blue, purple colors.
6.7. Interconnection with the Cytoskeleton (Actin and Microtubules)
Plastids move through the cytoplasm and are fixed in specific positions due to interactions with actin microfilaments. Plastid movement (chloroplast avoidance/accumulation responses) is mediated by myosins attached to the outer plastid membrane (Wada et al., 2003, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013). Microtubules are involved in orienting plastids during cell division (ensuring equal distribution of proplastids between daughter cells) and in forming the prolamellar body in etioplasts (Evert, 2006).
In polarized cells (e.g., in the root cap), amyloplasts (statoliths) sediment to the lower part of the cell under gravity, interacting with actin filaments and transmitting the gravitational signal via pressure changes on membranes. This is a key mechanism of gravitropism (Kiss, 2000, cited in Evert, 2006).
6.8. Interconnection with Plasmodesmata and the Cell Wall
Plastids are connected to neighboring cells via plasmodesmata – cytoplasmic channels that penetrate cell walls. Although plastids themselves do not pass through plasmodesmata (their size is too large), signaling molecules synthesized in plastids (e.g., PAP, β‑cyclocitral, ABA) can move through plasmodesmata. Stromules – tubular protrusions of plastids – can reach plasmodesmal fields and may participate in intercellular communication (Kwok & Hanson, 2004; Hanson & Sattarzadeh, 2011, cited in Renna et al., 2026; Altamura et al., 2024).
Although there are no direct physical contacts between plastids and the cell wall, photosynthesizing plastids supply the wall with sugars (cellulose, hemicelluloses are built from glucose coming from chloroplasts) as well as oxygen for wall oxidative enzymes (peroxidases). In turn, the cell wall determines cell shape, which affects plastid positioning (e.g., the peripheral positioning of chloroplasts in leaves).
6.9. Role of Stromules in Inter‑organelle Contacts
Stromules are dynamic stroma‑filled tubular protrusions of plastids, covered by a double membrane and having a diameter of about 0.5 μm. They have been found in all plastid types, but especially often in non‑green plastids and in sensory plastids of the epidermis and phloem. Stromules can:
-
connect different plastids within one cell (possibly for exchange of metabolites and signals);
-
come into close proximity to the nucleus, ER, mitochondria, and plasma membrane, forming membrane contact sites;
-
increase in number under stress (drought, salinity, pathogens) and under the influence of abscisic acid (ABA) and strigolactones (Renna et al., 2026; Altamura et al., 2024; Sierra et al., 2023).
Stromules do not contain DNA or ribosomes, but soluble proteins (e.g., GFP) as well as macromolecules (up to 550 kDa) can move through them. It is proposed that stromules facilitate retrograde signaling and delivery of metabolites to the nucleus and other organelles (Hanson & Hines, 2018, cited in Altamura et al., 2024).
6.10. Significance for Agricultural Science
Understanding the interconnections of plastids with other compartments is important for:
-
Managing the production process: targeting nuclear regulators of plastid functions (e.g., increasing expression of GLK genes can enhance photosynthesis and yield) (Waters et al., 2009, cited in Pogson et al., 2015).
-
Herbicide strategy: some herbicides disrupt not only plastids but also mitochondria (e.g., inhibitors of the proton gradient); selectivity is based on different sensitivity levels.
-
Biotechnology: plastid transformation (plastid vectors) gives high expression levels but requires coordination with nuclear signals for stability.
-
Stress adaptation: retrograde signaling is a target for creating drought‑ and salinity‑tolerant varieties (Chan et al., 2016; Altamura et al., 2024).
-
Stress signaling pathways: sensory plastids of the epidermis and phloem (SEP) activate defense programs upon pathogen attack and heavy metal exposure (Sierra et al., 2023; Altamura et al., 2024).
7. Applied Significance
The study of plastids in plant cells has direct applied significance for agriculture, biotechnology, breeding, the food industry, and ecology. Understanding the structure, functions, and dynamics of plastids makes it possible to purposefully influence plant productivity, crop quality, stress tolerance, and storage efficiency (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Sadali et al., 2019; Choi et al., 2021). The main areas of applied use of knowledge about plastids are listed below.
7.1. Breeding and Genetics: Cytoplasmic Inheritance
Since plastids in most flowering plants are inherited maternally (through the egg cell cytoplasm), traits encoded by the plastome do not segregate according to Mendelian laws in crosses. This property is used in breeding for:
-
Obtaining cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS). Mutations in plastid genes (or in mitochondrial genes, but often in combination with plastid ones) cause pollen sterility. CMS is widely used in the production of hybrid seeds of maize, sunflower, rice, sugar beet, onion, and many other crops, as it avoids the labor‑intensive emasculation of flowers (Hanson & Bentolila, 2004, cited in Evert, 2006; Andreeva & Rodman, 2002).
-
Preserving elite genotypes during vegetative propagation. In clonal micropropagation (potato, fruit, berry, ornamental crops), the plastid genotype of the original plant is fully transmitted to the offspring, ensuring the stability of economically valuable traits associated with plastids (e.g., herbicide resistance, fruit color, or carotenoid content) (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Sadali et al., 2019).
7.2. Plant Biotechnology: Plastid Transformation
Plastids (primarily chloroplasts and proplastids) are a promising target for genetic transformation. Plastid transformation (plastome transformation) has a number of advantages over nuclear transformation:
-
High expression – up to 10–20% of total soluble cell protein (up to 70% in some constructs), because the plastome is present in a large copy number (up to 10,000 per cell) (Maliga, 2004, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
-
Absence of position effect – the transgene is inserted into a strictly defined region of the plastome by homologous recombination, eliminating the expression variability typical of nuclear transformants.
-
Environmental safety – plastids in most crops are maternally inherited, preventing the spread of transgenes via pollen to wild relatives (biocontainment).
-
Multigene engineering – the operon organization of the plastome allows simultaneous expression of several genes (e.g., a complete biosynthetic pathway for a vitamin or an antibody) (Bock, 2015, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Practical achievements of plastid biotechnology:
-
Creation of tobacco plants synthesizing β‑carotene (provitamin A) in leaves (“golden” tobacco) (Wurbs et al., 2007, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
-
Production of “golden rice” with endosperm containing β‑carotene (second generation) – achieved by plastid transformation (first generation – nuclear transformation, plastid gives higher accumulation levels) (Ye et al., 2000, cited in Choi et al., 2021).
-
Production of therapeutic proteins (antibodies, vaccines, interferons) in tobacco and lettuce chloroplasts (enormous yields per hectare of processed biomass) (Daniell et al., 2016, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
-
Creation of herbicide‑resistant crops by introducing mutant copies of genes encoding herbicide target enzymes (e.g., 5‑enolpyruvylshikimate‑3‑phosphate synthase, EPSPS, for glyphosate resistance). Plastid expression of such genes prevents the transfer of resistance to weed species via pollen (Daniell, 2002, cited in Sadali et al., 2019).
7.3. Herbicide Strategy: Targets in Plastids
Many commercial herbicides act on processes localized in plastids, which explains their selective toxicity to plants (animals lack plastids). Key plastid targets (Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013; Lichtenthaler, 1999, cited in Evert, 2006; Andreeva & Rodman, 2002):
| Herbicide (active ingredient) | Mechanism of action | Plastid target |
|---|---|---|
| Glyphosate | Inhibition of 5‑enolpyruvylshikimate‑3‑phosphate synthase (EPSPS) in plastids | Shikimate pathway for aromatic amino acid synthesis (in plastids) |
| Simazine, atrazine (triazines) | Blocking electron transport in photosystem II (binding to D1 protein) | Thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts |
| Diquat, paraquat (bipyridyls) | Generation of reactive oxygen species in photosystem I (disruption of redox cycling) | Thylakoid membrane (electron acceptor from photosystem I) |
| Norflurazon (DOXP synthase inhibitor) | Blocks carotenoid synthesis in plastids (MEP pathway) | Plastidial isoprenoid pathway |
| Oxyfluorfen (diphenyl ether) | Inhibition of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) in plastids (and in mitochondria) | Chlorophyll synthesis (accumulation of phototoxic tetrapyrroles) |
Understanding the plastid localization of these targets allows the development of next‑generation herbicides with minimal impact on animals. Breeding of herbicide‑resistant crops (e.g., “Roundup Ready” maize and soybean) is achieved by introducing into the plant a mutant plastid (or nuclear) EPSPS gene insensitive to glyphosate (Daniell, 2002, cited in Sadali et al., 2019).
7.4. Control of Fruit Ripening and Product Quality
The conversion of chloroplasts into chromoplasts determines the color, taste, and aroma of many fruits (tomato, pepper, citrus, banana, watermelon, pumpkin). Agricultural significance:
-
Ripening regulation. Post‑harvest treatment of fruits with gases (ethylene to accelerate, 1‑methylcyclopropene, 1‑MCP, to delay) affects the rate of chloroplast breakdown and carotenoid synthesis. Controlled atmosphere (low O2, high CO2) suppresses the conversion of chloroplasts to chromoplasts, allowing green tomatoes and peppers to be stored longer (Brady, 1987, cited in Sadali et al., 2019; Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
-
Increasing nutritional value. Breeding for high β‑carotene content in chromoplasts of carrot, pumpkin, sweet potato, and mango allows enrichment of the diet with provitamin A, which is especially important in regions deficient in this vitamin (Giuliano et al., 2008, cited in Choi et al., 2021).
-
Improving market appearance. Creating varieties with bright red (lycopene), orange (β‑carotene), or yellow (xanthophylls) fruits is based on genetic control of plastid differentiation (e.g., mutations in the Or gene in cauliflower, causing chromoplast accumulation in inflorescences) (Li et al., 2006, cited in Rodriguez‑Concepcion & Lu, 2026).
7.5. Crop Storage: The Greening Problem
The conversion of amyloplasts into chloroplasts in the light (greening) in potato tubers, carrot, and turnip roots reduces market quality and leads to the accumulation of toxic solanines (potato) or chlorophyll that impairs taste. Applied measures:
-
Storage in the dark at controlled temperature and humidity.
-
Use of varieties with reduced greening capacity (low expression of chlorophyll synthesis genes in leucoplasts).
-
Application of chlorophyll synthesis inhibitors (e.g., maleic hydrazide) during long‑term storage (Ruf & Eckstein, 1994, cited in Evert, 2006; Andreeva & Rodman, 2002).
7.6. Phytopathology and Plant Protection
Some viruses and pathogenic bacteria attack plastids or alter their functions. For example:
-
Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) causes aggregation of chloroplasts and reduced photosynthesis.
-
Turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV) replicates its RNA in chloroplasts.
-
Bacteria of the genus Xanthomonas secrete effectors that disrupt plastid retrograde signaling, suppressing host defense responses (Padmanabhan et al., 2009, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Understanding plastids as an arena for pathogen‑plant interaction opens up ways to create resistant varieties, for example, by expressing antimicrobial peptides in plastids or suppressing viral proteins using RNA interference (Daniell et al., 2016, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013). In addition, sensory plastids of the epidermis and phloem activate defense programs upon pathogen attack (e.g., the fungus Phytophthora infestans), moving toward the nucleus and forming stromules (Irieda & Takano, 2021, cited in Altamura et al., 2024; Sierra et al., 2023).
7.7. Plastids as Stress Sensors and Tools for Enhancing Tolerance
Since plastids participate in retrograde signaling (Chan et al., 2016, cited in Altamura et al., 2024), they can be used as biosensors (e.g., genetically encoded fluorescent proteins under the control of plastid promoters to monitor plant status). Enhancing retrograde signals that increase resistance to drought and heat stress is a promising area of biotechnology. Expression in plastids of genes encoding enzymes that destroy reactive oxygen species (superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase) has already been shown to increase tolerance of tobacco and tomato to oxidative stress (Foyer & Shigeoka, 2011, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013). Furthermore, mutations in the MSH1 (MutS HOMOLOG 1) gene, localized in sensory plastids, cause epigenetic changes that can be inherited and increase resistance to abiotic stresses (Virdi et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2011, cited in Altamura et al., 2024; Sierra et al., 2023).
7.8. Nutritional and Fodder Value: Plastid Biofortification
Increasing the content in plastids of essential amino acids, vitamins (A, E, K, C – partially synthesized in plastids), and iron (ferritin‑like proteins) is a task for classical breeding and genetic engineering. Examples:
-
β‑carotene (provitamin A) – in chromoplasts and chloroplasts.
-
Tocopherols (vitamin E) – in plastoglobuli of chloroplasts and chromoplasts.
-
Phylloquinone (vitamin K1) – in thylakoid membranes.
-
Iron – can accumulate in chloroplasts in bound form without causing toxicity (Zuluaga & Pilon, 2020, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
7.9. Industrial and Medical Use of Plastid Products
Plastids serve as a source of valuable compounds used in industry and medicine:
-
Starch from amyloplasts – raw material for the food, textile, paper, and pharmaceutical industries.
-
Carotenoids from chromoplasts – natural colorants (β‑carotene, lycopene, capsanthin), antioxidant supplements, provitamins.
-
Oils from elaioplasts – edible, industrial, and biofuel.
-
Recombinant proteins (vaccines, antibodies, enzymes) synthesized in transformed plastids – a platform for producing biologically active compounds (Daniell et al., 2016, cited in Jarvis & López‑Juez, 2013).
Conclusion of the Section
The applied significance of plastids spans all stages of crop production: from breeding and biotechnology to plant protection, storage, and crop processing. Knowledge of plastid biology makes it possible to create crops with desired traits, develop environmentally friendly herbicides, increase the nutritional value of products, and reduce post‑harvest losses. For agricultural specialists, plastids are not only a cytological object but also a powerful tool for increasing the efficiency of agricultural production.
References
-
Altamura, M. M., Piacentini, D., Della Rovere, F., Fattorini, L., Valletta, A. & Falasca, G. (2024). Plastid dynamism integrates development and environment. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 213, 108813. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108813 PubMed
-
Andreeva, I. I. & Rodman, L. S. (2002). Botanika [Botany]. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow: KolosS. 488 p. ISBN 5-9532-0015-3. (In Russian)
-
Choi, H., Yi, T. & Ha, S.‑H. (2021). Diversity of Plastid Types and Their Interconversions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 692024. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.692024 PubMed
-
Evert, R. F. (2006). Esau‘s Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure, Function, and Development (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 624 p. ISBN 0‑471‑73843‑3.
-
Jarvis, P. & López‑Juez, E. (2013). Biogenesis and homeostasis of chloroplasts and other plastids. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 14(12), 787–802. DOI: 10.1038/nrm3702 PubMed
-
López‑Juez, E. (2007). Plastid biogenesis, between light and shadows. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(1), 11–26. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl196 PubMed
-
Pan, X., Mastrella, S., Khamzaaliyeva, M. & Ashley, D.‑D. (2024). Exploring the connections between ER‑based lipid metabolism and plasma membrane nanodomain signaling. New Phytologist, 243(1), 48–57. DOI: 10.1111/nph.19815 PubMed
-
Pogson, B. J., Ganguly, D. & Albrecht‑Borth, V. (2015). Insights into chloroplast biogenesis and development. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Bioenergetics, 1847(9), 1017–1024. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.02.002 PubMed
-
Renna, L., Stefano, G., Puggioni, M. P., Kim, S. J., Lavell, A., Froehlich, J. E., Burkart, G., Mancuso, S., Benning, C. & Brandizzi, F. (2026). Plant plastids: evolutionary origins, functional specialization, and organelle interactions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 77(1), 63–82. (DOI not provided in the source file)
-
Sadali, N. M., Sowden, R. G., Ling, Q. & Jarvis, R. P. (2019). Differentiation of chromoplasts and other plastids in plants. Plant Cell Reports, 38(7), 803–818. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-019-02420-2 PubMed
-
Serebryakova, T. I., Voronin, N. S., Elenevsky, A. G., Batygina, T. B., Shorina, N. I. & Savinykh, N. P. (2006). Botanika s osnovami fitotsenologii: Anatomiya i morfologiya rasteniy [Botany with fundamentals of phytocenology: Plant anatomy and morphology]. Moscow: Akademkniga. 543 p. ISBN 5-94628-251-4. (In Russian)
-
Sierra, J., Escobar‑Tovar, L. & Leon, P. (2023). Plastids: diving into their diversity, their functions, and their role in plant development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 74(8), 2508–2526. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad044 PubMed



