Senile (senescent) stage

Last updated: June 12, 2026EspañolРусский

Senile (senescent) stage of ontogenesis is the natural, irreversible, final period of an individual plant’s development (ontogenesis), following the complete cessation of generative (reproductive) activity. This stage is characterized by a progressive predominance of destructive processes (catabolism) over constructive processes (anabolism), ultimately leading to physiological old age and natural death of the individual.

In classical botanical literature, particularly in the works of the schools of A. A. Uranov and T. A. Rabotnov, this stage is also referred to as the post-reproductive period (Gatsuk et al., 1980; Yakovlev et al., 2008). An important detail should be noted immediately: the senile stage occurs only after the plant has completely exhausted its reproductive function. This fundamentally distinguishes it from old generative individuals (g3 according to the Gatsuk classification), which, despite their age and incipient signs of decline, are still capable of flowering and producing viable seeds.

The essence of the senile stage is the final reorganization of the entire physiological system of the organism. The plant ceases to be an integrated, actively functioning system and begins to gradually disintegrate, both morphologically and at the cellular level. Whereas generative stages featured mechanisms supporting the "repair" and renewal of structures, during the senile stage, defense mechanisms become depleted, and programmed degradation processes increase avalanche-like.

Key characteristics of the stage:

  1. Cessation of seed reproduction: This is the main distinguishing feature. The plant definitively loses the ability to produce flowers, fruits, and viable seeds.

  2. Predominance of catabolism: In all tissues and organs, the breakdown of complex organic substances (proteins, nucleic acids, lipids) begins to dominate over synthesis. This is accompanied by a sharp decline in the intensity of photosynthesis and respiration (Strasburger, 1971).

  3. Progressive disintegration: The integrity of the plant organism is disrupted. In herbaceous polycarpics (perennials), this manifests as the breakup of the bush or tussock into separate fragments (particles). In woody forms, it manifests as the dieback of large skeletal branches, formation of hollows, and bark exfoliation.

  4. Rejuvenation (return to juvenile traits): Paradoxically, against the backdrop of general decline, senile plants often begin to display traits characteristic of juvenile (young) individuals. For example, in senile Deschampsia cespitosa, narrow, short leaves typical of seedlings reappear (Gatsuk et al., 1980). This phenomenon is seen as a last-ditch attempt by the organism to survive by switching to a more primitive level of organization.

  5. Activation of cell death mechanisms: At the molecular level, aging is closely linked to autophagy ("self-eating" of the cell). Whereas in early stages autophagy helps the cell get rid of damaged organelles and survive under stress, in the senile period its hyperactivation leads to irreversible degradation of cellular structures and programmed cell death (Avila-Ospina et al., 2014). This is not chaotic destruction, but a regulated process.

Specifics of progression in different life forms. The duration and expression of the senile stage directly depend on the plant’s life strategy (Gatsuk et al., 1980):

  • Monocarpics (annuals and biennials): In these, the senile stage is very short and practically coincides with the fruiting period. After the last seeds mature, the aging processes increase avalanche-like, and the plant rapidly dies entirely.

  • Polycarpics (perennial herbs): The senile stage can be greatly extended over time. It manifests through long-term "particulation" — the gradual fragmentation of the primary bush into many smaller, partially independent fragments (particles). Each such particle represents the final stage of the life of the original genetic individual.

  • Woody plants: In trees and shrubs, the senile stage can last for decades or even centuries. It manifests as "top-dying" (death of the crown apex), formation of hollows, weakened growth, and the appearance of "water sprouts" (epicormic shoots), which are the plant’s attempt to rejuvenate.

Thus, the senile stage is not merely "decrepitude" and "decline," but a complex, genetically determined, and evolutionarily fixed stage of a plant’s life. It ensures the return of elements accumulated in the biomass to the ecosystem’s nutrient cycle and frees the ecological niche for the next generation, which is of great importance for both natural phytocenoses and agroecosystems.

1. General morpho-functional signs of the onset of the senile stage

Diagnosis of the senile stage under field conditions and in scientific research is based on a combination of external (morphological) and internal (functional) changes that are irreversible. These signs make it possible to reliably distinguish a senile plant from old, but still reproductively active individuals. Their analysis shows that aging is not a chaotic destruction, but an ordered process affecting all levels of the organism’s organization: from molecular to holistic (Gatsuk et al., 1980; Yakovlev et al., 2008).

1.1. Changes in growth rhythms: from deceleration to complete stop

The earliest and most objective sign of a plant entering the senile stage is the steady decline in the intensity of growth processes, up to their complete cessation.

  • In woody plants: The annual shoot elongation and trunk thickening (cambial activity) become negligible (Gatsuk et al., 1980). Whereas mature generative trees (g2–g3) still show noticeable growth, in senile individuals it is practically zero. The crown tops die off, resulting in "top-dying."

  • In herbaceous polycarpics: The formation of new vegetative and generative shoots completely ceases. For example, in dense-tussock grasses like Deschampsia cespitosa, no new tillering shoots are formed in the senile state, and the existing living shoots sharply reduce their linear growth (Gatsuk et al., 1980).

  • Physiological basis: This growth reduction is associated with the exhaustion of meristematic activity and disruption of the synthesis and transport of phytohormones, especially auxins and cytokinins, which are key stimulators of cell division and elongation (Bidlack & Jansky, 2021). Apical dominance is disrupted, which can lead to the chaotic growth of "water sprouts" as a last attempt at rejuvenation, but these shoots themselves quickly degenerate.

1.2. Color changes: chlorosis and necrosis

The second most obvious sign is the change in the color of vegetative organs, associated with the destruction of chlorophyll and other pigments.

  • Generalized chlorosis: Leaves lose their species-specific green color, becoming yellowish or pale green. This is a consequence of chloroplast degradation and the breakdown of chlorophyll-protein complexes (Avila-Ospina et al., 2014). Unlike natural autumnal leaf fall, this chlorosis is not seasonal or adaptive – it is irreversible and progressive.

  • Necrosis: Patches of dead tissue (necrosis) appear on leaves, bark, and other organs. This results from the accumulation of toxic metabolic products and the activation of programmed cell death (PCD) processes (Avila-Ospina et al., 2014; Miryeganeh, 2022).

  • Epigenetic regulation: Interestingly, color changes during aging may be linked to changes in DNA methylation patterns and histone modifications. For example, in Arabidopsis, it has been shown that with age, the expression of methyltransferase genes (MET1, CMT3) decreases, leading to overall genome hypomethylation and derepression of transposons, which in turn can cause genomic instability and accelerate aging (Miryeganeh, 2022; Ogneva et al., 2016, cited in Miryeganeh).

1.3. Individual disintegration: clonal breakdown

For perennial plants (especially herbs), the breakdown of the original individual into many smaller fragments – particles is characteristic (Gatsuk et al., 1980). This process has been particularly well studied in the Russian school of population biology.

  • In dense-tussock grasses (Deschampsia, Stipa): Aging begins in the center of the tussock. Here, old shoots die, and the tussock breaks up into separate particles – small tussocks, each consisting of several vegetative shoots connected by short rhizomes. In the senile state, the particles become completely isolated from each other (Gatsuk et al., 1980).

  • In long-rhizome plants (Aegopodium, Convallaria): Aging manifests in the death (destruction) of old sections of the rhizome. The clone breaks up into genetically identical but physiologically independent individuals. In the senile period, such particles become small, have few leaves, and are incapable of further vegetative spread.

  • Biological significance: Disintegration is not just destruction, but an evolutionarily fixed mechanism of "payback" for vegetative mobility. At the same time, it is a way of returning occupied resources to the ecosystem.

1.4. "Paradox of flowering": a final reproductive burst

A complex and not fully explained sign is the so-called "paradox of flowering" – abnormal, often abundant, but low-productivity flowering on senile individuals (Gatsuk et al., 1980).

  • External manifestations: Woody plants sometimes exhibit very abundant, but late flowering with small, malformed, or sterile flowers. In herbaceous polycarpics, senile individuals may form single, underdeveloped inflorescences.

  • Difference from normal generation: Unlike old generative plants (g3), which produce full-fledged, albeit few, seeds, a senile plant, if it forms flowers at all, generally does not set viable seeds. The germination capacity of seeds, if they are nonetheless formed, is sharply reduced (Yakovlev et al., 2008).

  • Possible explanation: This phenomenon can be seen as an "agonal" (pre‑mortem) activation of the organism’s last reserves. Apparently, against a background of general regulatory decline, derepression (removal of blockage) of flowering genes occurs, but the resource and hormonal support for the proper development of generative organs is lacking (Miryeganeh, 2022). This phenomenon is akin to "rejuvenating" flowering, but in this case it only underscores the depth of catabolic processes.

Thus, the combination of these signs – growth cessation, total chlorosis, disintegration of the individual’s body, and abnormal sterile flowering – makes it possible to confidently diagnose the onset of the senile stage in plants of various life forms.

2. Sequential description of aging processes

Plant aging during the senile stage is not a single event, but a time‑extended, strictly ordered process that begins at the molecular‑cellular level and gradually spreads to tissues, organs, and the entire organism. This sequence can be traced from the degradation of protoplasts of individual cells to the complete breakdown of a perennial clone or the death of a tree.

2.1. Symplastic senescence: death of protoplasts

The earliest and most profound changes occur at the cellular level. The term symplastic senescence emphasizes that the process affects the living phase of the cell – the protoplast (symplast), while cell walls may persist for a long time.

  • Organelle degradation: The initial trigger is membrane damage, especially the membranes of chloroplasts and mitochondria, by reactive oxygen species (ROS) that accumulate during aging (Avila‑Ospina et al., 2014). The process of autophagy is initiated – the cell begins to "digest" its own damaged components. Genes of the AuTophaGy (ATG) family play a key role here; their products form autophagosomes that capture fragments of chloroplasts (Rubisco‑containing bodies, RCBs) and deliver them to the vacuole for degradation (Avila‑Ospina et al., 2014; Ishida et al., 2008, cited in Avila‑Ospina).

  • Formation of air spaces: After protoplast death, the cell is no longer sealed. Air‑filled spaces arise in the cortex and xylem parenchyma. In the heartwood of trees, this phenomenon is called "dry rot" – wood sections lose moisture and mechanical strength (Strasburger, 1971). The formation of air spaces is one of the early microscopic signs of senility.

  • Epigenetic control: The intensity of symplastic senescence is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. In aging leaves of Arabidopsis, a decrease in the level of repressive histone marks (H3K27me3) on the promoters of genes related to cell wall degradation and programmed cell death is observed, leading to their activation (Miryeganeh, 2022; Brusslan et al., 2012, cited in Miryeganeh).

2.2. Destruction of the assimilatory apparatus: leaf dieback

A logical consequence of chloroplast and mesophyll death is massive leaf dieback. This process follows a strict pattern and is not chaotic.

  • Direction of dieback: In most woody and herbaceous plants, leaf senescence proceeds from the periphery to the center (in rosette plants) or from the bottom up (in plants with a shoot). The oldest, lower leaves turn yellow and fall first, then the process moves upward. In trees, desiccation begins with the apical (top‑dying) and peripheral branches of the crown (Gatsuk et al., 1980; Raven et al., 2013).

  • Resource mobilization: Leaf dieback is not a passive decay but an active process of mobilizing nutrients. Before falling, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other elements are withdrawn from the leaf and transported to storage tissues or growing points. This process provides up to 70‑80% of nitrogen reutilization (Avila‑Ospina et al., 2014).

  • Agronomic aspect: In agricultural crops (cereals, vegetables), premature dieback of lower leaves is a signal of nutrient deficiency or aging. In perennial grasses (cereals, legumes) at the senile stage, a rapid thinning of the stand is observed due to the death of old leaves while few new ones are formed.

2.3. "Heart rot" and hollowness: wood disintegration

In woody forms, the most spectacular manifestation of the senile stage is the destruction of the central part of the trunk – the formation of a hollow or "heart rot."

  • Mechanism: Once xylem cells die, their lumens become accessible to saprotrophic fungi and bacteria. In the absence of living defense mechanisms (e.g., production of phytoalexins), fungi quickly colonize the heartwood, causing brown or white rot (Strasburger, 1971). The process begins with heart (core) rot, then spreads, and the trunk becomes hollow.

  • Biological norm: Despite its seemingly pathological nature, hollow formation is a natural stage of aging for many long‑lived trees (oak, linden, willow). Hollow trees remain viable because the cambium and young sapwood (peripheral layers) remain alive and continue to conduct water.

  • Ecological role: Hollow trees acquire enormous ecological significance as nesting sites for birds, shelters for mammals and insects. From this perspective, the senile stage increases biodiversity in forest ecosystems.

2.4. Reparative regeneration: the last attempt at rejuvenation

One of the most paradoxical and interesting phenomena in the senile stage is reparative regeneration – the formation of "water sprouts" (epicormic shoots).

  • Manifestation: On old trees (e.g., apple, linden, oak), vertical, fast‑growing shoots with large leaves suddenly begin to grow actively on the trunk or at its base from dormant buds (latent meristems). Such shoots are called water sprouts or epicormic shoots. In herbaceous polycarpics (e.g., Asarum europaeum), senile particles sometimes form abnormally large leaves not typical of the species (Gatsuk et al., 1980).

  • Physiological meaning: Water sprouts are the plant’s attempt to "restart" ontogenesis. Apparently, with the weakening of apical dominance (due to reduced auxin synthesis), dormant buds receive a signal to grow. These shoots often have signs of juvenility: large leaves, high growth rate. However, they are typically functionally incomplete (weakly lignified, often affected by diseases) and quickly age themselves.

  • Evolutionary analogy: Some researchers (Gatsuk et al., 1980) draw a parallel between the formation of water sprouts on senile plants and the formation of particles in long‑rhizome species. In both cases, the organism tries to survive by forming new "young" modules against the background of the dying mother part. However, this mechanism rarely allows a significant extension of the individual’s life.

Thus, the sequence of aging processes – from the death of individual protoplasts to the complete breakdown of the plant’s structure – follows strict biological laws. First, the most "expensive" and rapidly renewed structures (chloroplasts, leaf mesophyll) are affected, then the conducting system is destroyed, and only in the last resort (or not completely) do meristems and storage tissues die. Such ordering has adaptive significance: the plant tries to maintain its ability to regenerate as long as possible, even at the cost of destroying its somatic part.

3. Specifics of the senile stage in different life forms

The senile stage is not universal in its manifestations. Its duration, expression, and specific mechanisms are closely linked to the plant’s life form and evolutionary strategy. What lasts a few days in an annual and ends with the death of the whole individual can last centuries in a perennial tree and be accompanied by complex processes of particulation and clonal reproduction (Gatsuk et al., 1980; Raven et al., 2013).

3.1. Monocarpic plants (annuals and biennials)

Monocarpics are plants that flower and fruit once in their lifetime, after which they die completely.

  • Brevity of the stage: In typical annuals (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana, Pisum sativum), the senile stage is extremely compressed and almost coincides with the completion of mass fruiting. As soon as the last seeds mature, a rapid aging program is triggered in the vegetative organs, and the plant dies within a few days or weeks (Raven et al., 2013).

  • Mechanism: A key role is played by monocentric aging – dieback begins in the growing points and spreads throughout the organism. At the molecular level, this is associated with a sharp activation of senescence genes (SAG12, etc.) and chloroplast degradation, a process largely independent of external conditions and rigidly genetically determined (Avila‑Ospina et al., 2014).

  • Agronomic nuance: In grain crops (wheat, barley), the senile stage occurs after grain filling. Yellowing and dieback of leaves ("ripening") is normal, but if it occurs too quickly (under the influence of drought or disease), grain filling is disrupted, and yield decreases (Bidlack & Jansky, 2021).

3.2. Polycarpic herbs (perennials)

Polycarpics are plants capable of flowering and fruiting repeatedly. Their senile stage is fundamentally different from that of annuals.

Clone disintegration: As already noted in section 1.3, the main content of the senile stage in perennial herbs is the breakdown of the primary individual into particles. Here, old age manifests not in the immediate death of the whole organism, but in the gradual "diminution" and weakening of the particles.

Examples from different ecological groups (according to the classification of Gatsuk et al., 1980):

  • Long‑rhizome plants (Aegopodium podagraria, Convallaria majalis): In the senile state, their ability to form new "stolons" (plagiotropic shoots) sharply decreases. Particles become solitary or consist of 1‑2 shoots, leaves become smaller, the root system is reduced. Such a particle does not last long and does not give rise to a new clone.

  • Dense‑tussock grasses (Deschampsia cespitosa, Stipa pennata): In the senile period, the tussock breaks down into many micro‑tussocks, in which living shoots account for less than 10% of the total biomass (Gatsuk et al., 1980). Tillering completely stops.

  • Tuber‑forming and bulbous plants: In tulips, potatoes, the senile stage occurs after the mother plant has formed a replacement bulb or tuber. The mother part dies, while the daughter part can enter a new generative phase. However, as the clone ages, bulbs become smaller and stop flowering.

Rejuvenation during vegetative reproduction: Importantly, particles separated from a senile individual often prove to be rejuvenated – they start their life cycle anew (from the virginile or even juvenile stage) (Gatsuk et al., 1980). Thus, the senile death of an individual does not mean the death of the genotype if it has been preserved in the particles.

3.3. Woody plants

The senile stage in trees and shrubs is the most prolonged and complex in its manifestations. It can last for hundreds of years.

  • The "old age" stage in trees: Gatsuk and co‑authors (1980) using the example of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) showed that trees clearly exhibit a period of old generative individuals (g3), which still bear fruit, and then the actual senile individuals, which no longer bear fruit and live out their days.

  • Key signs of senility in trees (according to Gatsuk et al., 1980; Strasburger, 1971):

  • Top‑dying: Death of the apical part of the crown. Water and nutrients cease to reach the upper part of the trunk, leading to its desiccation.

  • Hollowness: Complete destruction of the heartwood (heart rot). The trunk becomes hollow, but the tree continues to live thanks to the sapwood and cambium.

  • Bark exfoliation: Bark peels off in large blocks or strips (e.g., in old pines, plane trees). This results from the cessation of phellogen (cork cambium) activity and phloem death.

  • Water sprouts (epicormic shoots): Active growth of dormant buds on the trunk and thick branches. This is the tree’s attempt to restore the crown. However, water sprouts are usually weakly attached, have fragile wood, and often break off (Strasburger, 1971).

  • Exceptions to the rule: Some tree species (e.g., yew – Taxus baccata) can reach advanced old age with almost no hollow formation and retain the ability to regenerate. In others (e.g., birch), aging occurs relatively early (80‑100 years), and the tree quickly decays. The duration of the senile stage is determined by species specificity and growing conditions.

A comparative analysis of different life forms shows that the senile stage is not merely a passive dying, but an evolutionarily developed strategy for completing the life cycle. In monocarpics, it is aimed at the fastest possible return of nutrients to the soil. In polycarpics, it is aimed at preserving the genotype through particulation and vegetative reproduction. In trees, it is aimed at long‑term existence even with severe destruction of the somatic structure, thereby providing an ecological niche for many animal and plant species.

4. Agronomic significance and indication

Understanding the senile stage of ontogenesis has not only theoretical but also major practical importance for agriculture and forestry. For the agronomist, a senile plant is an economically inefficient element of the agroecosystem – it reduces yield, occupies space, and can serve as a source of infection. Timely diagnosis of aging allows informed decisions to be made about replacing plantings, performing rejuvenation pruning, or reseeding (renewing) perennial grasses (Bidlack & Jansky, 2021; Yakovlev et al., 2008).

4.1. Productivity significance: economic inefficiency

The main agronomic sign of the onset of the senile stage is a sharp and steady decline in productivity that cannot be compensated by any agronomic practices.

  • Reduction in fruit and seed yield: In fruit trees (apple, pear, cherry) and seed crops (sunflower, grain legumes), the setting of full‑fledged fruits and seeds ceases in the senile stage. Whereas old generative trees (g3) may still produce a small but marketable yield, senile individuals either do not fruit at all or produce small, shriveled seeds with low germination (Gatsuk et al., 1980; Yakovlev et al., 2008).

  • Decline in vegetative biomass: In forage perennial grasses (alfalfa, clover, timothy), the yield of green mass drops sharply in the senile stage. This is due to the cessation of tillering, leaf dieback, and the general diminution of particles (Gatsuk et al., 1980). The protein content in leaves also decreases due to degradation of the chlorophyll‑protein complex and disruption of nitrogen metabolism (Avila‑Ospina et al., 2014).

  • Economic threshold: The profitability of cultivating perennial crops is determined by the time when the increase in productivity from agronomic interventions (fertilization, irrigation) ceases to cover the costs. For an orchard, this is the moment when the costs of maintenance and harvesting exceed the value of the produce obtained. For meadows and pastures – when the projective cover by senile plants falls below 30‑40%, and active weed infestation begins.

4.2. Signals for agronomic interventions

Timely recognition of signs of aging allows the agronomist to apply corrective measures before productivity drops to zero. Depending on the crop and type of planting, these may be rejuvenation pruning or complete replacement of the stand.

Rejuvenation pruning in horticulture

For fruit and ornamental woody plants, the main method of combating aging is rejuvenation pruning.

  • Essence of the method: Removing old, dying skeletal branches ("top‑dying", with signs of bark necrosis) to stimulate the growth of "water sprouts" (epicormic shoots) from dormant buds (Bidlack & Jansky, 2021; Strasburger, 1971). Although short‑lived, these shoots form a new, more productive crown.

  • Physiological justification: Removing old parts relieves apical dominance and disrupts the auxin flow, stimulating cell division in dormant buds. Simultaneously, illumination and air circulation inside the crown improve.

  • Limitations: Rejuvenation pruning is effective only on old generative (g3) plants but is useless on truly senile ones, in which carbohydrate reserves in the roots are exhausted and the conducting system is destroyed. Moreover, it cannot be applied to monocarpic crops (e.g., cereals that have fruited once).

Grassland renewal (reseeding) in meadows and pastures

For perennial forage grasses and lawns, the analogue of rejuvenation pruning is grassland renewal – complete plowing of the old sod and sowing a new mixture of perennial grasses.

Indicators of the need for grassland renewal (according to Gatsuk et al., 1980; Yakovlev et al., 2008):

  • Breakup of dense‑tussock grasses (fescue, timothy) into separate small particles that lose contact with the soil.

  • A sharp increase in the proportion of moss and dead detritus in the sod (more than 30‑40%).

  • Mass infestation by root rots caused by the weakening of senile plants.

Timing: For most perennial grasses, the cultural longevity (period of maximum productivity) is 3‑5 years. By year 6‑8, productivity declines, and grassland renewal is required. Leaving a senile stand any longer is economically unprofitable – it does not even cover the cost of harvesting.

4.3. Phytosanitary role: "gateway for infection"

Senile plants are the most vulnerable link in agroecosystems from the perspective of phytopathology and entomology.

  • Weakened immunity: In the senile stage, the synthesis of defense compounds – phytoalexins, protease inhibitors – sharply decreases, and the ability to heal wounds (formation of callus and periderm) weakens. Epigenetic changes, including transposon derepression, may also make the genome more vulnerable (Miryeganeh, 2022).

  • Bark beetles and longhorn beetles: Weakened senile trees emit specific volatile substances (acids, alcohols) that serve as primary attractants for stem pests – bark beetles (Ipidae) and longhorn beetles (Cerambycidae). Infestation of healthy trees by these insects is unlikely; they prefer old and diseased specimens (Strasburger, 1971).

  • Necrotrophic fungi: Senile plants are massively infected by necrotrophic fungi (causal agents of root, foot, and stem rots), such as Armillaria mellea (honey fungus), Heterobasidion annosum (root rot fungus), Fusarium spp., and others. Dead tissues serve as a substrate for these saprotroph‑parasites.

  • Agroecosystem rule: In intensive agriculture, senile and over‑mature plants must be removed and destroyed (e.g., burned or deeply incorporated into the soil). Leaving them in the field or orchard creates a reservoir of pathogens and pests, which then spread to healthy plantings of the next crop rotation. This is especially important for controlling cereal root rots and fruit tree canker.

Thus, from an agronomic perspective, the senile stage is a period of economic and phytosanitary failure. The agronomist’s task is not to try to "treat" senile plants (except for particularly valuable specimens), but to diagnose the onset of this stage in a timely manner and remove such plants from the agroecosystem, replacing them with young, healthy, genetically improved plants or varieties.

5. Comparative characteristics with the preceding (Generative) stage

Since a separate publication is provided within this series of articles dedicated to the Generative stage of plant ontogenesis, it is appropriate here not to retell its content, but to emphasize the key differences between old generative and senile plants. This is necessary to avoid terminological confusion, since in field conditions an old but still fruiting individual (old generative plants, g3 according to the Gatsuk classification) is often mistakenly taken for a senile one (Gatsuk et al., 1980; Yakovlev et al., 2008).

Below is a summary table of comparative traits for vascular plants (using the example of polycarpic herbs and woody forms).

Trait Generative stage (old generative plants, g3) Senile (senescent) stage (s)
Capacity for seed reproduction Retained, although seed yield may be reduced compared to young and mature generative plants. Seeds may be small but retain germination. Completely lost. The plant does not form flowers, or flowers are abnormal, sterile. No seed set.
Balance of anabolism/catabolism Shifted towards catabolism, but equilibrium is maintained: dieback of old parts is compensated by formation of new ones. In trees, there is still some growth. Catabolism sharply dominates. New vegetative organs are practically not formed. In trees, growth is zero.
Organismal integrity (architectonics) The general structural plan is preserved. In herbs, bush breakup may begin, but connections between particles are still maintained. In trees, the crown is thinned, but skeletal branches are alive. Pronounced disintegration. In herbs – breakup into isolated, weak particles. In trees – top‑dying, hollowness, bark exfoliation.
Leaf apparatus condition Leaves turn yellow and fall at the end of the season (in deciduous forms). Early autumnal chlorosis is possible in old trees. Chlorosis and leaf necrosis are total and irreversible. New leaves are not formed, or they are juvenile but quickly die.
Type of aging Sequential, reversible (with rejuvenation pruning). Irreversible, terminal.
Response to rejuvenation pruning Positive: stimulates water sprout growth, temporarily increases yield. Absent or weakly positive (water sprouts age quickly and do not restore productivity).
Agronomic value Low, but may be economically justified for preserving a cultivar or under resource‑limited conditions. Zero or negative (phytosanitary risk).

5.1. Key conclusions for distinguishing the stages

  1. Presence of fruiting – a main but insufficient criterion: If a plant fruits (even weakly), it belongs to the generative stage (old generative). Absence of fruiting in the presence of living vegetative organs is the first signal for diagnosing senility.

  2. Disintegration vs. aging: Old generative plants may look "falling apart" (especially in grasses), but they retain the potential to form new shoots. In senile plants, this potential is exhausted.

  3. Epigenetic differences: In senile plants, unlike old generative ones, there is an irreversible disruption of DNA methylation patterns and histone modifications that cannot be corrected by external influences (Miryeganeh, 2022; Ogneva et al., 2016, cited in Miryeganeh). Old generative plants retain epigenetic plasticity.

  4. Practical algorithm for the agronomist:

    • If a tree (shrub, herbaceous perennial) flowers or produces viable seeds – it is the generative stage (even with strong signs of wear).

    • If flowering and fruiting are absent for 2‑3 consecutive seasons, while the plant retains external signs of life – diagnosis for senility is required (absence of growth, disintegration, chlorosis).

Distinguishing these two stages is critically important for making management decisions: old generative plants can be helped by rejuvenation pruning; senile ones are subject to unconditional removal from the agroecosystem.

References

  1. Avila-Ospina, L., Moison, M., Yoshimoto, K., Masclaux-Daubresse, C. (2014). ‘Autophagy, plant senescence, and nutrient recycling’, Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(14), 3799-3811. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru039 (PubMed)
  2. Bidlack, J. E., Jansky, S. H. (2021). ‘Growth and Development’, in Stern's Introductory Plant Biology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 187-211.
  3. Evert, R.F., Eichhorn, S.E. (2013). ‘Early Development of the Plant Body’, in Raven Biology of Plants. New York: W.H. Freeman, pp. 526-537.
  4. Gatsuk, L.E., Smirnova, O.V., Vorontzova, L.I., Zaugolnova, L.B., Zhukova, L.A. (1980). ‘Age States of Plants of Various Growth Forms: A Review’, The Journal of Ecology, 68(2), 675. doi: 10.2307/2259429
  5. Miryeganeh, M. (2022). ‘Epigenetic Mechanisms of Senescence in Plants’, Cells, 11(2), 251. doi: 10.3390/cells11020251 (PubMed)
  6. Strasburger, E., Noll, F., Schenck, H., Schimper, A. F. W. (1971). ‘Physiologie’, in von Denffer, D., Mägdefrau, K., Schumacher, W., Ehrendorfer, F. (ed.) Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, pp. 203-378.
  7. Яковлев, Г. П., Челомбитько, В. А., Дорофеев, В. И. (2008). ‘Рост, развитие и размножение [Growth, development and reproduction]’, in Ботаника [Botany]. Санкт-Петербург: СпецЛит, pp. 192-202.