Types of ontogeny and life strategies of plants
Before proceeding to the diversity of plant individual development, two key concepts must be clearly defined: ontogeny and life strategy. They form the basis for understanding how a plant exists in time and space, reproduces, and interacts with the environment.
Ontogeny (from Greek ὄντος — being and γένεσις — origin) is the set of successive morphological, physiological, and biochemical changes that an organism undergoes from zygote (fertilized egg) formation to natural death (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Evert 2006). In seed plants, ontogeny encompasses seed germination, growth and development of vegetative organs, flowering, fruiting, and senescence (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Individual plant development has three fundamental features that distinguish it from the ontogeny of most animals:
-
Openness of growth and development. Plants retain meristems throughout their life — tissues composed of undifferentiated, continuously dividing cells. Thanks to apical and intercalary meristems, stems and roots grow indefinitely, and new leaves and flowers are laid down sequentially, “on top” of existing structures (Evert 2006; Mauseth 2017). This allows the plant to adapt to environmental changes at any age.
-
Modularity of structure. The body of a higher plant is built from repeating elementary units — metamers. A typical shoot metamer includes a node with leaf(s), an axillary bud, and an internode (Serebryakova et al. 2006). Modularity enables the plant to respond locally to external influences: for example, flower earlier on one branch and produce vegetative shoots on another.
-
Change of age states. In the classical school of T. A. Rabotnov – A. A. Uranov, the ontogeny of perennial plants is divided into periods and age states differing in a set of qualitative traits (leaf shape, flowering ability, balance of living and dead parts). They distinguish latent (seed), virginal (juvenile and adult vegetative individuals), generative (flowering plants), and senile (aging) periods (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Yakovlev et al. 2005). In trees, for example ash, seedlings, juvenile plants, immature, virginal, young, mature, and old generative individuals are clearly distinguished (Zaugolnova 1968, cited in Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Moreover, ontogeny often exhibits abrupt changes in form and function — a phenomenon K. Goebel called heteroblasty (Goebel 1889, cited in Zotz et al. 2011). A classic example is common ivy (Hedera helix): young creeping shoots bear lobed leaves, whereas adult flowering individuals bear entire oval leaves (Mauseth 2017; Zotz et al. 2011). Heteroblasty is regulated by a decrease in miR156 activity and subsequent increase in SPL gene expression (Poethig 2013). This exemplifies how the ontogenetic program includes a shift in “strategies” during the life of a single plant.
Life strategies of plants. If ontogeny answers the question “how does a plant develop?”, then life strategy answers “why and with what efficiency?”. Life (or ecological) strategy is an evolutionarily established complex of adaptations determining lifespan, mode of reproduction, growth rate, and resistance to adverse factors (Mauseth 2017; Raven et al. 2005).
In agronomic and ecological practice, the CSR theory (Ramensky – Grime) is most widely applied, distinguishing three primary strategies (Grime 1979, cited in Stern 2021):
-
Competitors (C-strategists) — vigorous plants capable of rapidly capturing space and resources, actively suppressing neighbours (e.g., couch grass, stinging nettle).
-
Ruderals (R-strategists) — plants of disturbed habitats (weeds, ephemerals). They grow quickly, flower early and produce many seeds, but compete poorly (e.g., common chickweed, shepherd’s purse).
-
Stress-tolerators (S-strategists) — plants of poor or extreme environments (sands, bogs, high mountains). They grow very slowly, use resources sparingly, and live long (e.g., heather, many sedges).
Most crop plants in agrocenoses (wheat, maize, potato) represent secondary C or CR strategies, bred by humans from ruderal or competitive ancestors (Raven et al. 2005; Stern 2021).
Importance of knowing ontogeny types and life strategies for the agronomist. For a specialist in agriculture, understanding ontogeny and life strategies allows:
-
Predicting weed infestation of fields. Knowing that couch grass has a complex ontogeny with vegetative renewal (particulation), and white goosefoot has heterospermy (seeds with different dormancy periods), one can choose the correct tillage and herbicide system (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Managing perennial grasses and green manures. For example, for red clover it is important to know that its shoots renew sympodially, and timely mowing stimulates tillering.
-
Understanding harvest and storage times. Knowledge of generative development phases and senescence processes helps determine optimal harvest dates for grain and fruit crops, as well as seed storage conditions (stratification, seed dormancy) (Raven et al. 2005).
In the following sections of the article, we will discuss specific types of ontogeny (simple and complex, monocarpic and polycarpic) in detail and show how life strategies are realized in crop rotations and in nature. A detailed description of the stages (embryonic, juvenile, virginal, generative, and senile) is given in a separate article.
1. Differences between plant and animal ontogeny (for understanding the logic)
To understand why the types of ontogeny and life strategies of plants are so diverse and differ from those of animals, it is necessary to highlight the fundamental biological features unique to plants. These features determine the entire course of their individual development and interaction with the environment.
1.1 Unlimited growth and presence of meristems
Animals generally have a defined growth limit: after reaching maturity, their size hardly increases. Plants, however, are capable of unlimited (open) growth throughout their lives. This ability is ensured by the presence of meristems — embryonic tissues whose cells divide continuously (Evert 2006; Mauseth 2017).
Two types of meristems are distinguished:
-
Apical meristems are located at the tips of shoots and roots. They enable organs to grow in length. The shoot meristem regularly detaches new leaf primordia and stem segments (metamers), while the root meristem elongates the root and forms the root cap (Serebryakova et al. 2006; Yakovlev et al. 2005).
-
Lateral meristems — cambium and cork cambium (phellogen) — provide growth in thickness of stem and root, depositing secondary vascular tissues (xylem and phloem). It is due to cambial activity that annual wood rings form (Evert 2006).
In animals, such constant meristematic activity is absent: their tissues stop dividing after embryogenesis (except for hematopoietic tissue and epithelia).
1.2 Modular structure and metamerism
The body of a higher plant is built not as a single indivisible organ but as a repeating sequence of modules — metamers. A typical shoot metamer includes:
-
a node with leaf(s),
-
an axillary bud,
-
an internode (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Adding new metamers from the apical meristem is the main way of shoot elongation. Each metamer has basically a similar structure, but can differentiate differently depending on its position on the shoot and external conditions (Zotz et al. 2011). For example, leaves at the lower part of the shoot (lowest leaves) are often reduced to scales, while in the middle they develop a full blade.
This modularity gives the plant a huge advantage: local damage to one module (eaten leaf, broken branch) does not cause the death of the whole organism, because other modules continue to function, and dormant buds can replace lost parts (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
1.3 Absence of rigid cell fate determination and totipotency
In animals, early in embryogenesis, cell fates (e.g., becoming a neuron or muscle cell) are determined once and for all. In plants, even differentiated cells can, under certain conditions, return to a meristematic state and give rise to a new plant — this property is called totipotency. It was first demonstrated in carrot tissue culture (Steward in the 1950s, cited in Stern 2021).
Thanks to totipotency, the following are possible:
-
Vegetative propagation by cuttings, root suckers, tubers.
-
Regeneration of a whole plant from an isolated somatic cell.
-
Formation of adventitious buds and roots on unusual places — on leaves (in bryophyllum), on stems or old roots (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
For an animal, loss of a limb is irreversible; for a plant, a lost shoot or root can often be restored by the activity of dormant or adventitious meristems.
1.4 Predominantly sessile lifestyle and adaptive growth
Animals actively seek favourable conditions (food, warmth, mates) using movement. Plants, being attached to the substrate, cannot avoid adverse impacts. Their adaptation is achieved through growth and developmental plasticity (Mauseth 2017; Raven et al. 2005).
-
Under shading, shoots accelerate elongation, “reaching” for light.
-
Under water deficit, the root system becomes more powerful and deep, and leaves may become reduced or covered with a waxy bloom.
-
When wounded, dormant buds are activated, forming new shoots.
Such adaptive plasticity is possible precisely due to the features described above: unlimited growth, modularity, and the retention of meristems.
1.5 Specifics of senescence and death in plants
In most animals, senescence and death affect the whole organism more or less synchronously. In perennial plants, senescence can be partial and localized:
-
Leaves senesce and fall annually (leaf fall), but the stem and roots remain alive.
-
In shrubs, only the tips of individual branches die, while the root system and dormant buds at the base give rise to new shoots (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
In polycarpic species (e.g., bamboos), the entire shoot flowers and dies, but the plant may survive due to underground crowns.
In addition, plants widely exhibit the phenomenon of particulation — the disintegration of an individual into several independent parts (particules), each continuing to exist as a separate organism (Gatsuk et al. 1980). This is especially characteristic of long‑rhizomatous herbs and some shrubs.
1.6 Different roles of sexual and asexual reproduction
In higher animals, sexual reproduction is the dominant, and often the only, way of producing offspring. In plants, alongside seed (sexual) reproduction, vegetative reproduction (by body parts) is widespread and in many cases plays an even greater role in maintaining population numbers (Yakovlev et al. 2005; Stern 2021).
Alternation of generations (sporophyte — gametophyte), characteristic of all higher plants, has led in seed plants to extreme reduction of the gametophyte (pollen grain and embryo sac), which is completely dependent on the sporophyte. In animals, gametes are formed directly in the animal’s body, not on a separate generation.
1.7 Summary for the agronomist
For practical crop production, the following differences are most significant:
-
The ability to control vegetative propagation (cuttings, grafting, layering) — the basis of many methods of propagating fruit and ornamental crops.
-
The ability of plants to regenerate and the conditional immortality of individual clones (e.g., potato, strawberry) allows their repeated use.
-
Modularity and presence of dormant buds underlie such agronomic practices as rejuvenation pruning, crown formation, and stimulating tillering in cereals.
-
Knowledge of dieback types (monocarpy vs. polycarpy) helps plan crop rotations correctly: monocarpic weeds (annuals) can be exhausted by preventing them from seeding; polycarpic (perennial) weeds require deeper tillage that provokes depletion of underground storage organs.
Understanding these fundamental differences creates a basis for subsequent analysis of specific types of plant ontogeny and life strategies.
2. Basic classifications of ontogeny types
The diversity of ontogeny in higher plants can be systematised according to several key criteria. Each classification reflects different aspects of individual development: lifespan, growth pattern, ability for vegetative renewal, and relation to the reproductive phase. For the agronomist, the most practically significant are classifications by lifespan and by ability for vegetative reproduction.
2.1 Classification by lifespan
This is the oldest and most intuitive classification, underlying the division of cultivated plants into annuals, biennials, and perennials (Raven et al. 2005; Stern 2021). It is based on how many growing seasons a plant lives and fruits before dying.
Annuals (monocarpic annual plants)
Annuals (annualls) are plants that complete their full ontogeny from seed to seed within a single growing season (several months or even weeks). After fruiting, the whole plant dies. A characteristic feature is monocarpy (once‑in‑a‑lifetime flowering and fruiting) (Yakovlev et al. 2005).
Depending on flowering time and photoperiod requirements, annuals are subdivided into:
-
Spring annuals: germinate in spring, flower and fruit in summer–autumn of the same year (wheat, barley, oats, pea, flax, poppy). They do not require cold vernalization (Raven et al. 2005).
-
Winter annuals: germinate in autumn, overwinter in the rosette or seedling stage, and flower and fruit the following year (winter wheat, winter rye, some weeds). To flower, they need vernalization — exposure to low positive temperatures (Mauseth 2017; Raven et al. 2005).
-
Ephemerals: very short‑lived annuals (2‑4 months). Typical of deserts and semi‑deserts (bulbous bluegrass, spring whitlowgrass). They complete their life cycle during a short wet period (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Most field crops and weeds are annuals. Their agronomy aims at creating optimal conditions for growth within one season and preventing seeding of annual weeds (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Biennials
Biennials (bienns) are plants whose ontogeny takes two growing seasons. In the first year, they form a leaf rosette and accumulate reserves in the root (carrot, beet) or in the stem (cabbage, root parsley). In the second year (after vernalization), flowering shoots grow from renewal buds, the plant flowers, fruits, and then dies (Stern 2021; Raven et al. 2005).
Thus, biennials are also monocarpic, but their vegetative phase is stretched over two seasons. In agriculture, they are often cultivated as annuals (e.g., root crops are harvested in the first year without letting them flower), while seeds are obtained from mother plants transplanted in the second year.
Perennials
Perennials are plants that live more than two years and are capable of flowering and fruiting repeatedly over their lifetime (polycarpic perennials) (Gatsuk et al. 1980). Exceptions are the so‑called monocarpic perennials, which flower and fruit only once at the end of their life (e.g., some bamboo species, agave, palms). They have a long vegetative phase followed by a single generative development and death (Yakovlev et al. 2005).
According to the nature of overwintering organs and shoot systems, perennials are divided into:
-
Woody perennials (trees, shrubs, subshrubs) — have perennial lignifying shoots. Trees have a well‑defined main trunk (monopodium), shrubs have several equivalent trunks replacing each other sympodially (Serebryakova et al. 2006). Examples: oak, apple, currant, wormwood.
-
Herbaceous perennials (polycarpic herbs) — their above‑ground shoots die off annually, while underground organs (rhizomes, tubers, bulbs, caudices) persist and bear renewal buds (Gatsuk 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
For the agronomist, perennial grasses are the basis of forage lands (clover, alfalfa, timothy), as well as many fruit and berry crops. Understanding their ontogeny allows proper management of use and renewal of grass stands, pruning and rejuvenation of orchards.
Ecological and physiological mechanisms behind differences
Plant lifespan is closely related to the ecological strategy (CSR theory, see Chapter 4). Annuals are typical ruderals (R-strategists) or stress‑tolerators (S-strategists) in extreme conditions, whereas perennials are often competitors (C-strategists) (Mauseth 2017; Raven et al. 2005).
Physiologically, the transition to flowering in annuals and biennials is often controlled by photoperiodic response and vernalization (Mauseth 2017). In perennial trees, there is a long juvenile (virginal) period — for example, common ash first flowers only at 20‑30 years (Gatsuk et al. 1980). This period is necessary for forming a powerful crown and root system.
For the agronomist, it is important to know that:
-
Annual weeds are easier to destroy by preventing them from seeding.
-
Perennial rhizomatous weeds (couch grass, sow‑thistle) require deep tillage that provokes depletion of storage organs and awakening of dormant buds, after which they can be destroyed vegetatively (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Biennial crops (cabbage, carrot, beet) form valuable products (heads, roots) in the first year, and seeds in the second. Obtaining seeds requires a special storage regime for mother plants (stratification, vernalization).
In the next subsection we consider classification by growth pattern — monocentric, acropetal and polycentric types, which determine plant architecture and its ability for vegetative spread.
2.2 By growth pattern (ontogenetic form according to Rabotnov)
While lifespan classification describes only the time frame of an individual’s existence, classification by growth pattern (ontogenetic form) reflects spatial architecture and the plant’s ability for vegetative spread. This classification, developed in the school of T. A. Rabotnov and A. A. Uranov, is based on how the skeletal axis of the shoot forms during ontogeny and how long the primary (embryonic) shoot persists (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Three main types of ontogenetic form are distinguished: monocentric, acropetal, and polycentric. These types reflect different degrees of individual integration and their tendency to particulation — natural disintegration into independent parts.
Monocentric type
Monocentric type is characterised by the persistence of the main shoot derived from the embryo throughout ontogeny. The shoot system represents a single centre (“monocentre”). Lateral shoots (branches) never reach the power of the main axis and do not replace it (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
This type is characteristic of most trees (especially conifers — spruce, pine, fir), as well as some tap‑rooted herbaceous plants (lupine, red clover, dandelion). In trees, the main trunk forms monopodially and retains its apical bud for many years (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
In monocentric plants, the individual usually does not disintegrate into parts in old age; it dies entirely. Vegetative propagation is either uncharacteristic or weakly expressed (except for root sucker formation in some trees, e.g., aspen). Maintenance of the main shoot ensures a long life span and high competitive ability (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Acropetal type
Acropetal type (from Greek ἄκρος — tip and πέτομαι — to strive) is a growth pattern in which the shoot system forms through successive death of lower parts and upward growth due to new generations of shoots. The term was proposed for grasses and other plants with intercalary growth (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
In grasses (wheat, rye, timothy), the main shoot elongates thanks to intercalary meristems at the bases of internodes. The lower parts of the shoot eventually die, while the upper parts continue growing. Tillering (formation of lateral shoots) occurs from nodes at the base of the shoot, so the tussock or bush as a whole remains “pulled” toward the soil surface (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
The acropetal type often combines with polycentric features, especially in loose‑tussock grasses. However, in its pure form it describes a growth dynamic in which the plant seems to “step” over the substrate, leaving dead parts behind.
Polycentric type
Polycentric type is the most complex and interesting from the perspective of vegetative propagation. It is characterised by the fact that during ontogeny the initial shoot (from seed) sooner or later disintegrates into several more or less independent parts — particules, each having its own growth centre (“polycentre”). As a result, a clone is formed that can occupy a large area (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
The polycentric type is characteristic of many perennial herbs: long‑rhizomatous (couch grass, ground elder, coltsfoot), stolon‑forming (strawberry, creeping bugle), root‑suckering (yellow sow‑thistle, field bindweed), as well as some shrubs that produce root suckers (raspberry, lilac) (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
The process of disintegration of an individual into particules is called particulation. It can occur either in the first half of ontogeny (in actively vegetatively mobile species) or at the end (in aging shrubs and some herbs). After particulation, filial (daughter) individuals often rejuvenate — i.e., acquire traits of earlier age states (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Relationship with other classifications and agronomic significance
Classification by growth pattern is closely related to life strategies:
-
Monocentric type is characteristic of competitor plants (C-strategists), which tend to occupy a dominant position in the community without splitting into particules.
-
Polycentric type — for ruderal (R-strategists) and stress‑tolerant (S-strategists) species, which, thanks to vegetative spreading, quickly colonise disturbed or poor habitats (Grime 1979, cited in Mauseth 2017; Raven et al. 2005).
For the agronomist, understanding the growth pattern is critically important for controlling perennial weeds:
-
Rhizomatous (polycentric) weeds (couch grass, bermudagrass) require the exhaustion method: repeated cutting of rhizomes provokes bud awakening and new shoot growth, depleting reserves. As a result, after 1‑2 seasons the rhizomes are exhausted and the plant dies (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Tap‑rooted (monocentric) perennials (dandelion, bitter wormwood) are easier to destroy by deep cutting of the main root (below the root collar), since they lack a system of vegetative renewal from numerous root buds.
-
Root‑suckering weeds (field sow‑thistle, field bindweed) occupy an intermediate position. Their main root bears many adventitious buds that give rise to new shoots. Control requires a combination of mechanical and chemical treatments aimed at gradual exhaustion of the entire root system.
Thus, knowledge of the ontogenetic form allows not just identifying the weed species, but also choosing the optimal suppression strategy. A detailed description of age stages and particulation processes is given in a separate article.
3. Types of ontogeny from the perspective of vegetative renewal
For the agronomist, the most practically significant division of ontogeny types is by the plant’s ability for vegetative renewal and propagation. This classification is directly related to individual longevity, resistance to damage, and weed control strategies.
At the base of the division lies the question: can a plant after damage or after completing its generative phase produce new shoots not from seed but from vegetative organs — roots, rhizomes, stolons, bulbs, etc.?
Two main types are distinguished:
-
Simple (sexual) ontogeny — reproduction and renewal only by seeds.
-
Complex (vegetatively mobile) ontogeny — combination of seed reproduction with active vegetative spread and particulation.
3.1 Simple (sexual) ontogeny – from seed only
Simple (sexual) ontogeny is a type of individual development in which a new plant arises only from a seed (zygote). Throughout the individual’s life, vegetative organs (roots, stems, leaves) do not form adventitious buds capable of independent existence, and no particulation — disintegration of the mother plant into daughters — occurs (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Such plants reproduce exclusively by seeds; vegetative reproduction in nature is uncharacteristic or completely absent. When the root collar or main shoot is damaged, they usually die, as they have no system of vegetative renewal from dormant buds on roots or rhizomes.
Characteristic features of simple ontogeny
-
Presence of a taproot system with a well‑developed main root. Adventitious roots are absent or play only an auxiliary role (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Absence or weak development of rhizomes, stolons, bulbs, and other vegetative propagation organs.
-
Monocentric growth pattern (see 2.2.1): the whole plant develops from one centre — the main shoot of the embryo. Lateral shoots (branches) do not separate from the mother plant.
-
Death of the individual after completing the generative phase in monocarpic species (annuals, biennials) or gradual senescence while maintaining integrity in polycarpic trees without forming particules (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Examples of cultivated and wild plants
Classic examples of plants with simple sexual ontogeny are:
-
Table beet and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). The storage root forms from the main root and hypocotyl, but adventitious buds do not develop on it. If you dig up a beet and cut off the growing point, a new plant will not form — only seeds (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Annual sunflower (Helianthus annuus). A typical spring annual with a strong taproot. Vegetative propagation is absent.
-
Carrot (Daucus carota). In the first year it forms a storage root, in the second — a flowering stem. In nature, it reproduces only by seeds; the storage root does not produce adventitious buds (although in cultivation, regrowth of leaves from the crown may occur, but this does not lead to a new plant).
-
Annual legumes (pea, bean, soybean) — also have simple ontogeny. Their roots do not form adventitious buds.
Among perennials, simple sexual ontogeny is characteristic of many trees with monocentric growth, especially conifers (spruce, pine, fir), which do not produce root suckers. However, they can regenerate by seed, and vegetative propagation (e.g., by layering) is rare in nature and not the main mode (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Agronomic significance
Knowing that a crop or weed has simple ontogeny determines the management strategy:
-
For annual and biennial crops (beet, carrot, sunflower), the main goal is to obtain a harvest of seeds or vegetative mass. Vegetative propagation is not used (except for rare cases of micropropagation in biotechnology).
-
Control of annual weeds with simple ontogeny boils down to preventing their seeding: timely weeding, cultivation, herbicide application. If they are not allowed to set seeds, their population will drop sharply the next year (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
-
Perennial weeds with simple ontogeny (e.g., common dandelion — Taraxacum officinale, although it can reproduce by apomictic seeds, vegetatively it is very weak) are easier to destroy because they lack an extensive system of vegetative renewal. Cutting the main root below the root collar is enough to kill the plant.
In contrast, complex (vegetatively mobile) ontogeny (discussed in the next subsection) creates many more problems for the agronomist, as such plants are capable of active clonal spread and regeneration from small fragments of rhizomes or roots.
3.2 Complex (vegetatively mobile) ontogeny – combination of seed reproduction and particulation
Complex (vegetatively mobile) ontogeny is a type of individual development in which, alongside seed reproduction, the plant actively reproduces and disperses vegetatively — by forming particules (independent daughter individuals) from specialised or unspecialised vegetative organs (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
The key feature of this type is the ability for vegetative renewal and spread, thanks to which one seed‑derived individual can give rise to a clone occupying a significant area and persisting for many years (sometimes centuries), even if seed renewal is weak or absent (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Particulation and its role
The central process of complex ontogeny is particulation (from Latin particula — small part). It is the natural disintegration of the mother individual into several more or less independent parts — particules, each possessing its own root system and shoots (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Particulation can occur:
-
As a result of aging and death of central parts of the clone — e.g., in dense‑tussock grasses (tufted hairgrass), the centre of the tussock dies, and peripheral particules become isolated (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
-
By formation and subsequent breakdown of connecting organs — rhizomes, stolons, runners. In long‑rhizomatous plants (ground elder, couch grass), old parts of rhizomes die, and separate fragments with buds become independent plants (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Due to mechanical damage — during ploughing or cultivation, fragments of rhizomes or roots with buds are spread across the field, giving rise to new individuals (this is exploited by weeds for dispersal).
Particules are often rejuvenated — i.e., their age state corresponds to earlier ontogenetic stages (virginal rather than senile), ensuring the clone high viability (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Main variants of complex ontogeny
Gatsuk et al. (1980) distinguish three variants of complex ontogeny in polycarpic plants:
-
With tightly closed particules (variant 3a) — characteristic of dense‑tussock grasses (tufted hairgrass, sheep’s fescue), short‑rhizomatous herbs (lily‑of‑the‑valley, wild ginger), some bulbous plants. The clone remains compact for a long time (tussock), and particulation occurs only at late stages.
-
With open particules that rejuvenate (variant 3b) — typical of long‑rhizomatous plants (couch grass, ground elder, coltsfoot), stolon‑forming (strawberry, bugle), root‑suckering (field sow‑thistle, field bindweed). The clone spreads rapidly, occupying large areas. Daughter particules actively disperse and often rejuvenate (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
With open particules but without rejuvenation (variant 3b') — occurs in some long‑rhizomatous plants where filial individuals do not return to early age states.
Examples of cultivated and weed plants
White clover (Trifolium repens). A typical vegetatively mobile perennial. Rooting creeping shoots (stolons) give rise to new particules that quickly separate. In a sward, white clover can persist indefinitely through vegetative spread, even if seed renewal is weak (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Potato (Solanum tuberosum). Tubers are modified shoots bearing buds (“eyes”). They serve as organs of vegetative propagation and survival over unfavourable periods. In the wild (in Central America), wild potato also forms tubers, allowing the clone to persist year after year. Seed reproduction is used by breeders, but in commercial production vegetative propagation (by tubers) is used (Yakovlev et al. 2005).
Couch grass (Elytrigia repens). One of the most noxious rhizomatous weeds. Its long cord‑like rhizomes bear many buds. Even a small fragment of rhizome (2‑3 cm) with a bud can give rise to a new plant (Gatsuk et al. 1980). When ploughed, rhizomes are cut into pieces, each of which germinates — this is why simple ploughing does not destroy couch grass but rather promotes its propagation.
Agronomic significance
Complex vegetatively mobile ontogeny creates serious problems in agriculture, but also opens opportunities for vegetative propagation of crops.
Problems (weeds):
-
High clone persistence — even if seed renewal is suppressed, the weed population persists through vegetative spread.
-
Regeneration from fragments — many rhizomatous and root‑suckering weeds can regenerate from small pieces of rhizomes or roots during tillage (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
-
Need for special control methods — to exhaust storage organs, repeated cutting during intensive regrowth (exhaustion method) is required. Herbicides must have systemic action, penetrating into rhizomes.
Opportunities (crop plants):
-
Vegetative propagation of potato, strawberry, many fruit crops (root suckers of raspberry, runners of strawberry) allows preservation of cultivar traits and rapid multiplication of valuable genotypes.
-
In forage grasses (white clover, hybrid alfalfa), vegetative spread ensures sward longevity and resistance to grazing and mowing.
Thus, knowledge of ontogeny type (simple vs. complex) is the basis for choosing a management strategy for both crop and weed plants in agrocenoses. Detailed mechanisms of particulation and its regulation are described in a separate article.
4. Plant life strategies (according to Ramensky – Grime)
In the previous sections, we considered ontogeny as a sequence of age states and growth types. However, to understand a plant’s behaviour in a community (phytocoenosis) and its response to agronomic interventions, these characteristics are insufficient. It is necessary to know how the plant allocates resources among growth, reproduction, and survival under stress.
The answer to this question is provided by the doctrine of life (ecological) strategies. The most recognised in modern ecology and agronomy is the CSR theory, developed by Russian geobotanist L. G. Ramensky (1935) and later independently by English ecologist J. Grime (Grime 1979, cited in Mauseth 2017; Raven et al. 2005).
4.1 Competitors (C-strategists)
Competitors (C-strategists) are plants that possess a high ability to capture resources (light, water, mineral nutrients) and suppress neighbours. They dominate under favourable environmental conditions (adequate moisture, rich soils, absence of strong stresses).
Main traits of C-strategists
Competitor plants are characterised by the following features (Grime 1979, cited in Stern 2021; Mauseth 2017):
-
High growth rate and vigorous development of vegetative organs (large leaves, tall stem, branched root system).
-
Significant longevity (perennial herbs, shrubs, trees).
-
Efficient resource use: high photosynthetic intensity, effective uptake of water and minerals.
-
Suppression of competitors through rapid canopy closure (shading) or release of inhibiting substances into the soil (allelopathy).
-
Low plasticity under unfavourable conditions — under stress, competitive species sharply reduce productivity.
Examples of C-strategists in nature and agrocenoses
-
Forest trees: pedunculate oak (Quercus robur), Norway spruce (Picea abies), European beech (Fagus sylvatica) — dominants of climax forests, forming powerful crowns and root systems (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Perennial grasses: smooth brome (Bromopsis inermis), couch grass (Elytrigia repens) on fertile soils — quickly form dense stands.
-
Weeds in crops: under intensive farming (high fertiliser rates, irrigation), species that can rapidly use resources gain competitive advantage — e.g., white goosefoot (Chenopodium album) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Zotz et al. 2011).
-
Crop plants: many varieties of wheat, maize, sunflower bred for intensive technologies also exhibit C-strategist traits — they realise their full potential only on high agronomic backgrounds.
Agronomic significance
Knowing that a species is a C-strategist allows predicting its behaviour in an agrocenosis:
-
Competitive crop plants better suppress weeds if plant density is high and mineral nutrition is adequate. Therefore, dense sowing and timely fertilisation are effective for them.
-
Weed C-strategists are most dangerous on fertile, well‑watered soils. Agronomic measures alone (weeding, cultivation) are insufficient — they recover quickly. A combination of mechanical and chemical control (herbicides) with exhaustion of storage organs (rhizome cutting) is necessary (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
-
In crop rotation, competitive crops (e.g., winter wheat, maize) should be placed after predecessors that leave few weeds. Conversely, weakly competitive species (flax, carrot, beet) require more thorough pre‑sowing tillage.
In the following subsections we consider ruderals (R-strategists) and stress‑tolerators (S-strategists), as well as their secondary combinations.
4.2 Ruderals (R-strategists)
Ruderals (R-strategists) are plants adapted to exist under conditions of regular disturbance (e.g., ploughing, trampling, fires, landfills, roadsides). They realise a strategy opposite to the competitive one: rapid growth, early flowering, and high seed productivity with low competitiveness.
The term comes from Latin rudus — rubble, trash, because ruderals are often the first to colonise disturbed anthropogenic habitats.
Main traits of R-strategists
According to CSR theory (Grime 1979, cited in Mauseth 2017; Raven et al. 2005), ruderals are characterised by:
-
High potential growth rate, but often with low tissue density (thin leaves, non‑lignifying stems).
-
Short life cycle — most ruderals are annuals (or short‑lived). Their ontogeny is compressed to a few weeks or months.
-
Abundant and early seed reproduction. Seeds are small, numerous, often remaining viable in the soil for years (forming a soil seed bank).
-
Absence or weak development of long‑term storage organs (rhizomes, tubers).
-
Low competitiveness. In permanent, undisturbed sites, they are quickly outcompeted by perennial competitors.
Examples of ruderal species
Classic ruderals are typical weeds of disturbed habitats:
-
Common chickweed (Stellaria media). An annual capable of producing several generations per season, flowering even on poor soils.
-
Shepherd’s purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris). Produces thousands of tiny seeds that remain viable in the soil for 5‑10 years (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
White goosefoot (Chenopodium album). A typical ruderal, yet on fertile soils it exhibits competitive traits (transition to C-R strategy).
-
Annual bluegrass (Poa annua) — a cosmopolitan weed of lawns and paths.
-
Desert ephemerals (spring whitlowgrass, some Brassicaceae) — extreme expression of ruderality: the entire life cycle takes 2‑4 weeks, seeds remain in the soil for years (Yakovlev et al. 2005).
Physiological and ontogenetic features
Ruderals usually have simple (sexual) ontogeny (see 3.1). Their strategy is aimed at completing the life cycle as quickly as possible with minimal investment in vegetative structure. They often exhibit photoperiodic neutrality or weak photoperiod dependence, allowing them to flower at any day length (Raven et al. 2005).
Ruderals often exhibit heterocarpy or heterospermy — production of different types of seeds. For example, white goosefoot produces three types of seeds: large ones germinating immediately; small ones with long dormancy; and intermediate ones. This provides a bet‑hedging strategy in unpredictable disturbance conditions (Serebryakova et al. 2006; Zotz et al. 2011).
Agronomic significance
Ruderals are the main group of weeds on arable land. Their features dictate special control measures:
-
Soil seed bank — the main advantage of ruderals. Even with long‑term suppression of vegetative plants, seeds persist in the soil. To reduce their reserve, provocation irrigation (stimulating germination followed by mechanical treatment) and alternation of crops with different timings and methods of tillage are used (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
-
Ephemeral growth habit requires timely weeding at early stages; otherwise the weed will quickly flower and seed. Delay in cultivation only worsens infestation.
-
In organic farming, mulching, provocation sowing of green manures, and surface tillage (harrowing) to destroy seedlings are used against ruderals.
-
When establishing lawns, roadsides, or reclaiming dumps, ruderal species act as pioneers — they quickly stabilise the surface, creating conditions for subsequent introduction of perennial competitors.
In the next subsection we consider the third primary strategy — stress‑tolerators (S-strategists), as well as transitional types (C-R, C-S, S-R), which are most often encountered in agrocenoses.
4.3 Stress‑tolerators (S-strategists)
Stress‑tolerators (S-strategists) are plants adapted to exist under conditions of constant or periodic stress caused by resource deficits: water deficiency (drought), low temperatures, poor soils (sands, peatlands), salinity, deep shade (Grime 1979, cited in Raven et al. 2005; Mauseth 2017).
In contrast to ruderals, S-strategists do not use favourable periods for rapid growth but survive through tolerance — physiological resistance and long‑term vegetative existence.
Main traits of S-strategists
Characteristic features of stress‑tolerant species (Grime 1979, cited in Stern 2021; Gatsuk et al. 1980):
-
Very slow growth, often limited. Vegetative productivity is low.
-
Long lifespan — perennial herbs, dwarf shrubs, rarely trees. Ontogeny is stretched over decades.
-
Resource economy: tough, often evergreen or leathery leaves with high concentrations of protective substances (phenols, tannins), thick cuticle; root systems are often mycorrhizal, improving uptake from poor soils.
-
Prevalence of vegetative reproduction over seed reproduction, especially in extreme conditions (bogs, tundra). Seeds germinate rarely, but clonal spread ensures species persistence (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
-
Resistance to stresses: drought, freezing, trampling, salinity.
Examples of S-strategists in nature and agrocenoses
-
Common heather (Calluna vulgaris) — dominant of heathlands on poor acidic soils, grows slowly, lives for decades, reproduces both by seed and vegetatively (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) and cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos) — typical S-strategists of the taiga zone, forming clones on poor peat or rocky soils.
-
Sedges (Carex spp.) — many species of bogs and saline meadows are S-strategists, forming dense tussocks.
-
Mosses and lichens — extreme S‑strategists, capable of withstanding complete desiccation and recovering after rewetting (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
-
Weeds on stressed soils: on saline lands — glasswort (Salicornia europaea), saltwort (Salsola spp.); on acidic poor arable lands — sheep’s sorrel (Rumex acetosella), common bentgrass (Agrostis capillaris).
Among crop plants, pure S‑strategists are practically absent because breeding aims at high productivity, which contradicts slow growth and tolerance. However, some forage grasses grown on poor soils are close to S‑strategists (e.g., red fescue — Festuca rubra, perennial ryegrass — Lolium perenne under low nitrogen input).
Agronomic significance
-
On low‑productivity soils (sands, solonetz, peatlands), stress‑tolerant species are natural donors of phytomass. They can be used for phytoremediation, grassland establishment on dumps.
-
Control of S‑strategists in crops is often difficult due to their perennial clonal growth and herbicide resistance (especially evergreens). The main method is increasing soil fertility (liming acidic soils, fertilisation), which shifts conditions to more favourable ones, allowing competitive crop plants to outcompete them (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
-
Grazing use: on poor pastures, livestock grazing promotes the spread of S‑strategists (sedges, heather) because they are resistant to trampling and defoliation. To improve the sward, fertilisation and periodic reseeding are needed (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
4.4 Secondary strategies (C-R, C-S, S-R)
Pure C, R, and S strategies are theoretical poles. In nature, most species occupy intermediate positions, combining traits of two or even all three primary strategies. Grime distinguished secondary (mixed) strategies: C-R, C-S, and S-R (Grime 1979, cited in Stern 2021; Mauseth 2017).
Competitive‑ruderal strategy (C-R)
C-R strategists combine high growth rate and competitive ability under moderate stress with rapid seed productivity. These are typical crop plants and weeds on rich but regularly disturbed soils.
Examples: winter wheat, maize, barley, as well as weeds like white goosefoot (Chenopodium album), pigweed (Amaranthus spp.). Fertilisation and irrigation enhance their competitive traits, while mechanical tillage enhances ruderal traits (ability to quickly seed and recover after damage).
Competitive‑stress‑tolerant strategy (C-S)
C-S strategists are perennial plants capable of dominating under conditions of constant but not too severe stress (e.g., moderate nitrogen deficiency, periodic waterlogging, partial shade). They grow more slowly than pure competitors, but outcompete them under stress factors.
Examples: many forest perennial herbs (ground elder — Aegopodium podagraria, European wild ginger — Asarum europaeum), grasses and legumes on low‑fertility soils (alfalfa under low nitrogen — C‑S rather than C). In agrocenoses, C‑S strategists often become a problem on fallow lands and pastures without fertilisation.
Stress‑tolerant‑ruderal strategy (S-R)
S-R strategists are a paradoxical combination: they grow under stressful conditions (poor soils, drought) yet reproduce quickly by seed and do not invest in perennial structures. These are annual or short‑lived plants of extreme habitats (pioneers on sand dumps, in rock crevices, on solonetz).
Examples: desert and semi‑desert ephemerals; weeds such as field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense), wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) on poor soils; salt‑tolerant ruderal species — seepweed (Suaeda spp.), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus). S‑R strategists are the rarest type.
Agronomic significance of mixed strategies
-
Crop plants are mostly C‑R strategists, especially field annuals. They require fertility, irrigation, but rapidly form yield and easily reproduce by seed. They typically have simple sexual ontogeny (see 3.1).
-
Perennial forage grasses (alfalfa, clover, timothy) are typical C‑S strategists. Their longevity and resistance to mowing and grazing are based on perennial underground organs and the ability for vegetative renewal.
-
Weeds can exhibit different strategies depending on the agronomic background. On high agronomic backgrounds, C‑R weeds dominate; on poor soils and under minimal tillage, S‑R weeds dominate; on fallows and pastures, C‑S species dominate. The choice of farming system and crop rotation should take this ratio into account (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Understanding secondary strategies allows more accurate prediction of plant responses to changes in agrotechnology and proper selection of weed control measures (e.g., on poor soils, provocation methods that exhaust the seed bank of S‑R weeds are more effective; on fertile soils, agrotechniques that suppress C‑R weeds through competitive crops are more effective).
5. Ontogeny of agricultural plants
Knowledge of general patterns of ontogeny and life strategies is necessary, but for the agronomist, understanding the ontogeny of specific crop plants is key. Crop plants, through breeding, have acquired traits that strongly differ from their wild ancestors: determinate growth type, altered photoperiodic response, reduction or loss of vegetative propagation. In this section, we consider the main types of ontogeny in agricultural plants that have direct practical importance for crop management and yield formation.
5.1 Determinate and indeterminate growth types
The distinction between determinate and indeterminate growth is one of the key traits defining shoot system architecture, growing season length, and ripening time in many crops, especially legumes and solanaceous plants (tomato, pepper).
Definition
Indeterminate growth type (from Latin in — not and determinare — to limit) is growth in which the main shoot (and often lateral shoots) never ends with an inflorescence or flower. The apical meristem is maintained throughout the growing season, continuously producing new leaves and side shoots. The plant can grow indefinitely (under favourable conditions).
Determinate growth type (from Latin determinare — to limit) is growth in which the main shoot ends with an inflorescence or flower. After that, elongation of the main shoot stops. Vegetative growth continues via lateral shoots, but they may also be limited (Stern 2021; Raven et al. 2005).
Expression in different crops
In legumes (soybean, pea, bean, lupine):
-
Indeterminate soybean (Glycine max) and pea (Pisum sativum) varieties continue vegetative growth after flowering begins. Flowers are set on the main shoot in leaf axils sequentially from bottom to top, and flowering is spread over several weeks. Such varieties are better adapted to long growing seasons but mature later and less uniformly.
-
Determinate varieties of the same crops terminate main shoot growth with a terminal inflorescence. Flowering and fruit set are more synchronous, plants form a compact bush. They are preferred for mechanical harvesting and in regions with short summers (Stern 2021; Raven et al. 2005).
In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum):
-
Indeterminate (vine or cordon) tomatoes — plants with unlimited main stem growth. They require sucker removal (pruning of side shoots) and staking. Flower clusters form every 3‑4 leaves. Suitable for greenhouse cultivation, fruit over a long period.
-
Determinate (bush) tomatoes — plants in which the main stem, after forming 3‑6 clusters, terminates with an inflorescence and stops growing. All shoots end in inflorescences, so the bush has a limited height (usually 40‑80 cm). They are characterised by uniform ripening, require little or no suckering. Preferred for open‑field cultivation and mechanical harvesting (Stern 2021; Mauseth 2017).
In bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), bush (determinate) and climbing (indeterminate) forms are distinguished, which also determine growing method and ripening time.
Effect on ripening time and yield
Ripening time: determinate varieties are generally earlier maturing, as the transition to flowering and fruiting occurs faster. Indeterminate varieties yield later but can produce over a longer period.
Uniformity of ripening: determinate forms ripen more uniformly, simplifying mechanical harvesting (especially for soybean, pea, tomato).
Agronomy: for indeterminate soybean varieties, desiccation is sometimes needed to accelerate ripening. For indeterminate tomatoes, trellises and pruning are required (Mauseth 2017).
Breeding significance: the shift from indeterminate to determinate growth is often controlled by one or a few genes, making it relatively easy to create varieties with desired architecture (e.g., dt1 gene in soybean, sp (self‑pruning) gene in tomato) (Stern 2021).
Physiological basis
Determinate growth is associated with an earlier switch of the apical meristem from the vegetative to the generative state. This switch is regulated by hormonal factors (especially gibberellins and florigen) and is genetically controlled. In determinate forms, expression of flowering genes occurs earlier and at smaller plant size. In indeterminate forms, long vegetative growth is maintained, which is advantageous when large vegetative mass is needed (e.g., for silage) or when the risk of early frosts is low.
For the agronomist, the choice between determinate and indeterminate varieties is a compromise between early maturity and harvest uniformity on one hand, and potential productivity and adaptability to a long season on the other. In the Non‑Black Earth region and Siberia, determinate forms are preferred, whereas in southern regions, indeterminate varieties that provide higher total yield can be successfully grown (Raven et al. 2005).
In the next subsection we consider photoperiodic response — another crucial ontogenetic trait determining crop adaptation to different latitudes.
5.2 Photoperiodic response
One of the key factors determining the timing of flowering in many agricultural plants is photoperiod — the ratio of light to dark periods in a day. The ability of plants to respond to photoperiod is called photoperiodism (Raven et al. 2005; Mauseth 2017).
Classification of plants by photoperiodic response
Depending on the day length that induces flowering, three main groups are distinguished (Raven et al. 2005; Stern 2021):
-
Short‑day plants (SDP) — flower when the light period is shorter than a critical length. These are usually plants of tropical and subtropical origin (soybean, rice, millet, sorghum, sunflower, cotton, tobacco). In temperate latitudes, they flower in late summer – autumn. For many, the critical factor is lengthening of the night rather than shortening of the day (Mauseth 2017). Among weeds, SDP include pigweed, barnyard grass.
-
Long‑day plants (LDP) — flower when the light period exceeds a critical length. These are plants of high latitudes, summer‑flowering (wheat, rye, barley, oats, flax, potato, spinach, radish). In temperate climates, they flower in spring and early summer. When days shorten (autumn), flowering is delayed.
-
Day‑neutral plants — flower independently of day length, upon reaching a certain developmental stage (tomato, cucumber, pepper, eggplant, bean, buckwheat). For them, determining factors may be temperature, plant age, or accumulated biomass (Raven et al. 2005; Stern 2021).
Physiological mechanism
Photoperiod perception occurs in leaves, not in the apical meristem. In leaves, under the control of phytochrome (and cryptochromes) and circadian rhythms, the protein FT (Florigen) is synthesised, which is transported via phloem to the apical meristem and initiates the transition to flowering (Mauseth 2017; Poethig 2013). A key role is played by the length of the dark period: SDP flower only when the night exceeds a critical length; LDP, conversely, require a short night. A single red light pulse in the middle of a long night can interrupt the dark period and prevent flowering in SDP but promote it in LDP (Raven et al. 2005).
Agronomic significance
Choice of varieties by photoperiodic sensitivity. When moving a crop to new latitudes, its photoperiodic type must be considered. For example, southern (short‑day) soybean varieties, when grown in the north, may not flower before frost or will flower very late, whereas northern (weakly sensitive or neutral) varieties mature successfully (Raven et al. 2005).
Control of flowering time. In protected cultivation (greenhouses), by regulating lighting one can shift flowering in SDP crops (chrysanthemum, everbearing strawberry) or, conversely, delay it to obtain more vegetative mass (e.g., in lettuce, spinach — LDP plants that bolt quickly under long days).
Breeding for photoperiodic neutrality. Most modern varieties of major agricultural crops (wheat, barley, rice, maize) are neutral or weakly sensitive, allowing them to be grown across a wide range of latitudes (Raven et al. 2005). However, in some cases (e.g., for green mass production of lupine or clover), a long‑day response remains, which must be considered when choosing sowing dates.
5.3 Spring and winter forms
A special case of photoperiodic and temperature regulation of ontogeny is the division of crops into spring and winter forms. This phenomenon is characteristic of annual cereals (wheat, rye, barley), as well as some legumes (pea, vetch) and crucifers (rapeseed).
Definition
Spring forms — complete their life cycle from seed to seed within one growing season. They do not require low‑temperature exposure for flowering; they flower under spring‑summer temperatures and long days (for LDP) or long days (Raven et al. 2005).
Winter forms — in order to flower, they must undergo vernalization — exposure to low positive temperatures (usually 0…+8 °C) for several weeks (Mauseth 2017; Stern 2021). In nature, this occurs during winter. If winter forms are sown in spring, they will not flower that same year but will continue vegetative growth. Therefore, they are sown in autumn; after winter vernalization, they resume growth in spring and flower in summer.
Physiological basis
Vernalization is perceived by the apical meristem (unlike photoperiod, which is perceived by leaves). Under cold, expression of the flowering repressor gene FLC (in Arabidopsis and related species) is suppressed in the meristem, allowing activation of florigen under favourable conditions (Mauseth 2017; Poethig 2013). After vernalization, plants become capable of flowering under long days (for typical winter cereals) or under neutral photoperiod. There are also winter forms of biennials (cabbage, carrot, beet), where vernalization is also necessary but flowering occurs in the second year of growth (Stern 2021).
Agronomic significance
Sowing dates. Winter forms are sown in autumn (in central Russia — August–September) so they can root and tiller before cold weather and then overwinter. Spring forms are sown in early spring.
Winter hardiness. Winter forms undergo hardening in autumn and acquire frost resistance. Spring forms lack this ability; they can only be sown in spring and cannot withstand winter temperatures (Raven et al. 2005).
Breeding. Intermediate (facultative) forms exist that can yield under both autumn and spring sowing. Their creation expands the cultivation area and allows more flexible crop planning.
Practical techniques. In some cases (e.g., growing winter wheat in Siberia), it is important to calculate sowing dates precisely so that plants undergo vernalization but do not freeze. Sowing too early may cause overgrowth and reduced winter hardiness; sowing too late may prevent sufficient tillering and lead to freezing (Stern 2021).
The relationship between vernalization and photoperiodism is illustrated by winter rye: it requires vernalization, but after vernalization, flowering occurs only under long days. Thus, the plant uses two sequential signals: first cold (winter), then long days (spring–summer), ensuring flowering at the optimal time (Mauseth 2017).
For the agronomist, knowledge of photoperiodic response and whether a variety is spring or winter type is the basis for developing variety‑specific agronomy, choosing sowing dates, and selecting crop rotation predecessors. In the next section, we consider how ontogeny and life strategies relate to the production process — yield formation and assimilate distribution in the plant.
6. Ontogeny and the production process
The production process is the set of processes that determine the accumulation of organic matter (yield) by the plant. It includes photosynthesis, respiration, uptake of water and minerals, and allocation (distribution) of synthesised substances among different organs. The type of ontogeny and life strategy largely predetermine how the root system forms, how assimilates are distributed between vegetative mass and fruits, and how the plant responds to fertilisation.
6.1 Root system formation
The root system is the main organ for soil nutrition. Its architecture (depth of penetration, degree of branching, ratio of main to adventitious roots) is closely linked to ontogeny type and life strategy (Evert 2006; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Dependence on ontogeny type
Simple (sexual) ontogeny (beet, sunflower, carrot, annual legumes) — characterised, as a rule, by a taproot system. The main root, developed from the embryonic radicle, penetrates deep into the soil and functions throughout life. Lateral roots branch from it, but the main root remains dominant. Such a system provides the plant with access to water from deep horizons, important under dry conditions (Evert 2006; Gatsuk et al. 1980). However, in some crops (e.g., sunflower), under intensive nitrogen nutrition and irrigation, the taproot system may weaken, giving way to a fibrous system (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Complex (vegetatively mobile) ontogeny (white clover, potato, couch grass) — characterised by a fibrous root system consisting of adventitious roots arising from shoot nodes (rhizomes, stolons, tubers). The main root, if it develops, dies early. Such a system ensures rapid exploitation of the top, most fertile soil layer, but makes the plant dependent on surface moisture (Gatsuk et al. 1980; Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Relationship with life strategies
Competitors (C-strategists) — usually form a powerful, deep‑penetrating and highly branched root system, allowing them to intercept resources from neighbours. In competitor trees (oak, beech), roots can go down 5‑10 m or more (Raven et al. 2005).
Ruderals (R-strategists) — have a shallow but fast‑growing root system, often fibrous. They efficiently use short‑term resources but cannot tolerate drought or soil compaction (Mauseth 2017).
Stress‑tolerators (S-strategists) — root systems are often mycorrhizal (especially in Ericaceae, Orchidaceae), enhancing uptake from poor soils. In many S‑strategists (sedges, heather), roots are perennial, tough, slow‑growing (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Agronomic significance
When cultivating cereals and row crops, knowledge of root system type allows correct choice of depth and method of primary tillage. For example, crops with a taproot system (sunflower, beet) require deeper ploughing or subsoiling to eliminate plough pans.
For controlling rhizomatous weeds (complex ontogeny), the exhaustion method is effective — repeated shallow cutting of rhizomes, which stimulates bud awakening and depletion of reserves (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Tap‑rooted perennial weeds (dandelion, wormwood) are easier to destroy by deep cutting of the main root below the root collar (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
6.2 Allocation of plastic substances
Allocation is the distribution of assimilates (photosynthetic products) among different plant organs: vegetative (roots, stems, leaves) and generative (flowers, fruits, seeds). The type of ontogeny and life strategy determines the direction of this flow (Raven et al. 2005; Mauseth 2017).
Annuals (monocarpic) and perennials (polycarpic)
Annuals (monocarpics) — allocation shifts strongly toward generative organs after the transition to flowering. Most assimilates are directed to seeds; vegetative organs senesce and die. In cereals (wheat, barley), the harvest index (grain mass to total above‑ground mass ratio) can reach 0.4‑0.5 (Stern 2021).
Perennials (polycarpics) — assimilates are directed both to vegetative growth (especially in trees and shrubs) and to fruit and seed formation. A large part of the carbon is stored in perennial tissues (trunk, roots, rhizomes). In fruit crops (apple, pear), there is periodicity of fruiting associated with alternation of years with high and low allocation to generative organs (Raven et al. 2005).
Relationship with life strategies
Ruderals (R-strategists) — maximum allocation to seeds. Vegetative mass is minimal. This ensures rapid reproduction and colonisation of disturbed sites.
Competitors (C-strategists) — a significant portion of assimilates goes to building powerful vegetative structures (trunk, branches, leaf canopy), allowing capture of space and light. Allocation to seeds is lower than in ruderals.
Stress‑tolerators (S-strategists) — assimilates are predominantly stored in perennial storage organs (rhizomes, wood), while height growth and seed production are limited (Grime 1979, cited in Raven et al. 2005; Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Agronomic significance
To obtain high grain yields (wheat, rice, maize), it is necessary to manage allocation in favour of the ear or cob. This is aided by: optimal plant density, nitrogen top‑dressing at the stem elongation – heading stage, and the use of determinate varieties (Stern 2021).
In forage grasses (clover, alfalfa, timothy), it is important that allocation goes to leaf mass rather than stems. For this, timely cutting at the budding – early flowering stage is used (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
In fruit crops, allocation is regulated by pruning (rejuvenation, crown shaping), fruit thinning, and fertilisation. Pruning stimulates vegetative growth, while limiting fruit set enhances allocation to the remaining fruits (Raven et al. 2005).
6.3 Responsiveness to fertilisation
Responsiveness to mineral fertilisation is a crucial property of cultivated plants, but it is also closely linked to ontogeny type and life strategy.
Differences among strategies
Ruderals (R-strategists) — have high “greediness” for fertilisers (especially nitrogen). When nitrogen is applied, they sharply increase vegetative mass, often at the expense of allocation to fruits (luxuriant growth). This property is used in breeding intensive‑type varieties, but also explains the high competitive ability of ruderal weeds on fertilised fields (Mauseth 2017; Stern 2021). Examples: white goosefoot, pigweed.
Competitors (C-strategists) — also respond well to fertilisers, especially phosphorus and potassium, but their response is more balanced: the increase in vegetative mass does not dominate over seed yield as strongly. Typical C‑strategists (perennial grasses) give yield increases with NPK (Serebryakova et al. 2006).
Stress‑tolerators (S-strategists) — responsiveness to fertilisers is weak or absent. Applying fertilisers on poor soils may even depress them by activating competitors. S‑strategists are adapted to low nutrient levels, and increased fertility often leads to their displacement (Raven et al. 2005; Gatsuk et al. 1980). For example, heather on a fertilised plot is quickly replaced by grasses.
Agronomic significance
Crop varieties bred for intensive technologies are close to R‑ or C‑R‑strategists in their characteristics: they are highly responsive to fertilisers but require protection from pests and diseases because their tissues are less resistant (Stern 2021).
Extensive‑type varieties (drought‑tolerant, salt‑tolerant, short‑statured) exhibit traits of S‑ or S‑R‑strategists: they respond weakly to fertilisers but yield reliably under stress conditions (Raven et al. 2005).
When developing a fertilisation system, the ontogenetic form of the weed must be considered. Rhizomatous weeds (complex ontogeny, C‑ or C‑R‑strategists) respond well to nitrogen, so their suppression requires applying fertilisers as localised side‑dressing (under the crop) and using herbicides (Gatsuk et al. 1980).
Practical conclusion
Knowledge of the relationship between ontogeny type and life strategy with the production process allows the agronomist to:
-
Apply fertilisers differentially (rates, timing, methods) depending on the cultivated crop and the predominant weed species in the field.
-
Select varieties with the required root system architecture and allocation type (determinate – for rapid yield return, indeterminate – for extended fruiting).
-
Plan crop rotations so that fields with high fertility grow competitive crops (capable of suppressing weeds), while low‑fertility fields grow stress‑tolerant species or varieties.
References
- Bidlack, J. E., Jansky, S. H. (2021). ‘Growth and Development’, in Stern's Introductory Plant Biology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 187-211.
- Evert, R.F., Eichhorn, S.E. (2013). ‘External Factors and Plant Growth’, in Raven Biology of Plants. New York: W.H. Freeman, 278-316.
- Evert, Ray F. (2006). ‘Structure and Development of the Plant Body — An Overview’, in Esau's Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure, Function, and Development. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 1-13.
- Gatsuk, L.E., Smirnova, O.V., Vorontzova, L.I., Zaugolnova, L.B., Zhukova, L.A. (1980). ‘Age States of Plants of Various Growth Forms: A Review’, The Journal of Ecology, 68(2), 675. doi: 10.2307/2259429
- Mauseth, J. D. (2017). ‘Development and Morphogenesis’, in Botany: An Introduction to Plant Biology. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, ch. 14.
- Poethig, R.S. (2013). ‘Vegetative Phase Change and Shoot Maturation in Plants’, in Current Topics in Developmental Biology. : Elsevier, 125-152.
- Strasburger, E., Noll, F., Schenck, H., Schimper, A. F. W. (1971). ‘Morphologie’, in von Denffer, D., Mägdefrau, K., Schumacher, W., Ehrendorfer, F. (ed.) Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, pp. 9-202.
- Zotz, G., Wilhelm, K., Becker, A. (2011). ‘Heteroblasty—A Review’, The Botanical Review, 77(2), 109-151. doi: 10.1007/s12229-010-9062-8
- Серебрякова, Т. И., Воронин, Н. С., Еленевский, А. Г., Батыгина, Т. Б., Шорина, Н. И., Савиных, Н. П. (2006). ‘Начальные этапы онтогенеза растений Анатомия и морфология вегетативных органов [Initial stages of plant ontogenesis Anatomy and morphology of vegetative organs]’, in Ботаника с основами фитоценологии. Анатомия и морфология растений [Botany with Basic Phytocoenology. Plant Anatomy and Morphology]. Москва: ИКЦ «Академкнига», pp. 138-366.
- Яковлев, Г. П., Челомбитько, В. А., Дорофеев, В. И. (2008). ‘Рост, развитие и размножение [Growth, development and reproduction]’, in Ботаника [Botany]. Санкт-Петербург: СпецЛит, pp. 192-202.

