Long-distance communication
Imagine a plant. We are accustomed to seeing its above-ground part—the shoot with leaves, flowers, and fruits. But underground, an equally complex and active part is hidden—the root system. For a long time, it was believed that the root was simply a “pump” supplying water and mineral elements, and the shoot was a “factory” producing organic substances. However, modern plant physiology shows that these are two parts of a single organism that constantly exchange information.
Today we begin a module on the integration of physiological processes. And our first topic is how the root and shoot learn about each other’s state. This is a key question for understanding the integrity of the plant organism.
1. Why does the root constantly talk to the shoot?
At first glance, the answer is obvious: the root absorbs water and minerals, the shoot consumes them. But if it were only about transport of substances, the plant would be merely a sum of two compartments.
The root is a sensory system
The root is not just an organ of absorption. It is an extended sensory system deployed in the soil, continuously monitoring a huge number of parameters. The root senses:
- water availability in the soil
- concentration and ratio of mineral elements
- soil temperature
- aeration (oxygen content)
- soil density and mechanical resistance
- presence of toxic substances and pathogens
All this information must be transmitted to the shoot, because the shoot cannot “see” or “feel” what is happening in the soil. It is in a different environment and relies on signals coming from the root system (Medvedev, 2012).
The root is not a passive executor
It is important to understand: the root does not simply carry out commands from the shoot. It actively participates in regulating the entire life of the plant. It is in the root that many phytohormones are synthesised, which are then transported to the shoot and control its growth and development. The root is the first to respond to changes in the soil and generates appropriate signals that force the shoot to change its activity.
Why is “conversation” necessary?
If the root cannot inform the shoot about water shortage, the leaves will continue to transpire and wilt. If the root does not report nitrogen deficiency, the shoot will not activate adaptation programs. If the shoot does not inform the root about sufficient photosynthates, the root will not develop.
The plant must work as a single whole, and for this, constant bidirectional communication between root and shoot is necessary (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Water balance as an example of the need for communication
Consider a simple example. Water enters the plant through the roots and evaporates through the leaves. It seems simple. But how does the shoot know that water in the soil is becoming scarce? It has no direct contact with the soil. Information about water deficit must come from the root system. And it does—in the form of hormonal and hydraulic signals.
Moreover, the process of water evaporation by leaves (transpiration) is not just a loss of water. Transpiration creates negative pressure (tension) in the xylem vessels, which “pulls” water from the roots. This is a hydraulic signal—the fastest way to transmit information over a distance (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Brodribb et al., 2015).
Thus, the root constantly tells the shoot what is happening in the soil. Without this message, the shoot cannot adequately regulate its activity.
2. What signals go from bottom to top?
The root, as we have said, is not just a “pump” passively pumping water. It is an active sensory organ that continuously perceives information from the soil and transmits it to the shoot. But how exactly is this information transmitted? Signals coming from the root to the shoot can be divided into three categories: hormonal, hydraulic, and trophic. Each type of signal is a communication channel with its own speed, information capacity, and purpose.
2.1 Hormonal signals: chemical messages
Hormones are the main language in which the root “talks” to the shoot. Chemical molecules synthesised in the root move through the xylem vessels in the ascending water flow and reach target cells in the shoot. There they are recognised by specific receptors and trigger cascades of responses.
It is important to understand not just the list of hormones, but what information each of them carries. This is the physiological meaning of hormonal signalling (Medvedev, 2012).
Signal about mineral nutrition: cytokinins
Cytokinins are a group of hormones that are primarily synthesised in the roots. Their synthesis and transport to the shoot directly depend on the plant’s nitrogen supply.
When there is enough nitrate in the soil, the root actively synthesises cytokinins. These hormones travel via the xylem to the shoot and act as a signal: “There is enough nitrogen in the soil, you can actively grow.” In the shoot, cytokinins stimulate cell division, leaf growth, delay senescence, and activate the use of amino acids for protein synthesis (Medvedev, 2012; Engels et al., 2012).
When nitrogen becomes scarce, cytokinin synthesis in the root sharply decreases. Less “growth signal” reaches the shoot. This leads to a slowdown in above‑ground development, yellowing and senescence of lower leaves. The plant, in effect, tells itself: “There is little nitrogen, it is not profitable to increase green mass; better direct resources to root development in search of nitrogen.”
Interestingly, not only nitrogen but also phosphorus and potassium affect cytokinin synthesis. Deficiency of any macronutrient reduces the level of cytokinins in the root and their delivery to the shoot (Marschner, 2012).
Key cytokinin signal: “Nitrogen availability and general mineral nutrition are normal/deficient.”
Signal about water stress: abscisic acid
Abscisic acid (ABA) is a stress hormone. When the root begins to experience water shortage (due to soil drying, salinity, or chilling), ABA synthesis in root tips sharply increases (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
ABA travels via the xylem to the leaves and acts as an alarm signal: “Water in the soil is becoming scarce, close the stomata immediately!” In leaves, ABA causes rapid stomatal closure, reducing transpiration and preventing further water loss.
In addition, ABA affects shoot growth: it inhibits cell division and elongation, especially in young leaves. Thus, it “slows down” above‑ground growth under water deficit (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Important: ABA acts not only as a signal to the shoot. Its increase in the root also affects the root itself—stimulating root hair growth and branching in search of water.
Key ABA signal: “Water is becoming less—reduce transpiration and slow growth.”
Signal about salinity and osmotic stress
Under soil salinisation (increased salt concentration), the root experiences osmotic stress—water enters cells less readily. This also activates ABA synthesis in the root, and the mechanism described above comes into play.
In addition, under salinity, specific signalling molecules may be synthesised in the root that affect ion distribution in the shoot and ion channel function.
Key signal: “Osmotic stress—reduce transpiration.”
Signal about mechanical resistance: ethylene
In dense soil or when obstacles are present, the root experiences mechanical resistance. This stimulates ethylene synthesis in the root system. Ethylene is a gaseous hormone that can spread not only through vessels but also diffuse through intercellular spaces.
Ethylene from the root can be transmitted to the shoot. In the shoot, it causes a complex of reactions known as the “triple response”—slowing of elongation growth, thickening of the stem, and change in growth orientation. This helps the plant overcome obstacles (Medvedev, 2012).
Key ethylene signal: “There is a mechanical obstacle—change growth.”
Signal about pathogens: jasmonates and salicylic acid
When attacked by soil pathogens (fungi, bacteria, nematodes), the root activates defence responses. In response, jasmonic and salicylic acids are synthesised—signalling molecules that trigger expression of defence genes.
These signals can be transmitted to the shoot via the vessels, preparing above‑ground organs for possible attack by the same pathogens (Medvedev, 2012). This is called systemic acquired resistance.
Key signal: “There is a pathogen—prepare defence.”
2.2 Hydraulic signals: the fastest channel
Hydraulic signals are the fastest way to transmit information from the root to the shoot. They propagate almost instantaneously (at the speed of water movement in xylem vessels—tens of metres per hour) (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Brodribb et al., 2015).
What is a hydraulic signal?
Water moves through xylem vessels under negative pressure (tension) created by leaf transpiration. This tension (“suction force”) is transmitted from leaves to roots along the entire xylem.
When the root begins to absorb less water (due to soil drying, salinity, or chilling), the tension in the xylem increases—pressure falls. This pressure drop is instantly transmitted throughout the xylem, reaching the most distant leaves within seconds (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Information carried by the hydraulic signal
The hydraulic signal is a general‑purpose signal: “Less water is coming in!” It does not say why (drought, salinity, or cold), but it tells what is happening. And it does not require synthesis of new molecules.
A classic example: with sudden soil drying, leaves begin to lose turgor and wilt within minutes. This is a response to the hydraulic signal. Stomata close even if the hormonal signal (ABA) has not yet reached the leaves (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Why is the hydraulic signal the fastest?
The speed of propagation of the hydraulic signal is determined by the speed of water movement in the vessels—from 10 to 150 metres per hour. This is thousands of times faster than hormone transport with water flow (where speed is measured in centimetres per hour) (Brodribb et al., 2015).
Hydraulic signal and cavitation
Under very strong water stress, the tension in the xylem can become so high that air bubbles form in the vessels—this phenomenon is called cavitation. Bubbles block water flow. The occurrence of cavitation is another hydraulic signal that reports a critical level of stress. Irreversible damage to the conducting system may occur.
Plants can “hear” cavitation—it is accompanied by acoustic signals (ultrasound) that have been recorded in experiments (Brodribb et al., 2015).
Hydraulic signals and local decisions
The hydraulic signal acts on the whole plant as a whole. However, local pressure changes can also occur in individual root segments, allowing local decisions (see Section 4).
2.3 Trophic signals: information in the flow of substances
Trophic signals are information encoded in the flow of nutrients that move from root to shoot and back. This is the “language” of concentrations.
Carbohydrates from leaves—a signal for the root
The flow of sucrose from leaves to the root is not just nutrition. It is information about how intensively photosynthesis is proceeding. The more sugars reach the root, the better the shoot provides the root with energy.
The root “evaluates” the sugar flow as a signal: “Photosynthesis is active, there is plenty of energy—we can actively absorb minerals and grow” (Engels et al., 2012).
When photosynthesis decreases (cloudy weather, drought, leaf ageing), the sugar flow to the root diminishes. The root receives a signal: “There is little energy—need to economise, reduce uptake.” This leads to a decrease in ion uptake rate and root growth (Medvedev, 2012).
Ions as trophic signals
The concentration and ratio of ions in the xylem sap carry information about the mineral composition of the soil. An increased concentration of nitrates in the xylem is a signal to the shoot that nitrogen is sufficient and can be actively used for amino acid and protein synthesis (Medvedev, 2012).
A change in the potassium‑to‑sodium ratio in the xylem sap signals salinity. This can affect the function of ion channels in leaves and the regulation of osmotic pressure.
Metabolites as signals
Some products of root metabolism (e.g., organic acids, amino acids) can perform signalling functions when they enter the shoot. They inform about the metabolic status of the root system.
Difference between trophic signals and hormonal/hydraulic ones
- Hydraulic signal — fastest but carries minimal information (only the fact: “pressure dropped”).
- Hormonal signal — slower but carries specific information about the type of stress (drought, nitrogen deficiency, pathogen).
- Trophic signal — slowest but most informative. It shows the scale of the problem or well‑being (exactly how many nutrients are available, how active photosynthesis is).
Interconnection of signals
It is important to understand that the three types of signals do not work in isolation but in close interaction. For example, during drought:
1. First, the hydraulic signal acts—an instantaneous pressure drop in the xylem. Stomata close very quickly.
2. Almost simultaneously, ABA synthesis is activated in the root—a hormonal signal that reaches the leaves and consolidates the effect, keeping stomata closed.
3. Due to stomatal closure, CO2 uptake decreases, photosynthesis slows down. The sugar (trophic) flow to the root decreases. The root “understands” that the shoot cannot supply it with energy and reduces its activity.
Thus, all three channels work as a single system, providing multi‑level and rapid adaptation (Medvedev, 2012).
Key conclusion of Section 2: from the root to the shoot, three types of signals are sent:
- Hormonal — specific information about the type of event (drought, nitrogen deficit, pathogen). Slower than hydraulic, but more informative.
- Hydraulic — the fastest alarm signal. Instant notification of water supply disruption. Minimum information, maximum speed.
- Trophic — the slowest but most informative system. Shows the scale and nature of changes in resource supply.
All three channels work simultaneously and interconnectedly, creating a complex but reliable system for transmitting information from root to shoot.
2.1 Hormonal signals: the chemical language of the root
Hormones are the main language in which the root “talks” to the shoot. Unlike hydraulic signals, which only carry the fact of pressure change, hormonal signals contain specific information: what exactly happened in the soil and how to respond.
It is essential to grasp the key principle: a hormonal signal is not just a molecule moving from one point to another. It is a chemical message that is decoded by target cells in the shoot through receptor systems and triggers a cascade of physiological reactions. The same hormone can carry different information depending on concentration, timing, and interaction with other signals (Medvedev, 2012).
Let us examine the main hormonal signals that the root sends to the shoot. We will not simply list hormones—we will find out what specific information each conveys.
Signal about mineral nutrition: cytokinins
What happens in the root. Cytokinins are a group of hormones (adenine derivatives) synthesised primarily in root tips, especially in zones of active cell division (meristems). The intensity of their synthesis directly depends on the plant’s nitrogen supply (Medvedev, 2012; Engels et al., 2012).
When there is enough nitrate (\mathrm{NO_3^-}) in the soil, the root actively absorbs it, and cytokinin synthesis is initiated in root cells. These hormones enter the xylem sap and are carried with the ascending water flow to the shoot.
What information the signal carries. Cytokinins tell the shoot: “There is enough nitrogen in the soil. You can actively build green mass, develop leaves, divide cells. Growth conditions are favourable.”
In the shoot, cytokinins act as a “permissive signal” for many processes:
- stimulate cell division in meristems;
- activate leaf and shoot growth;
- delay leaf senescence (suppress chlorophyll and protein degradation);
- enhance the use of amino acids for protein synthesis;
- promote the conversion of etiolated seedlings into normally developed ones (photomorphogenesis).
What happens under nitrogen deficiency. When soil nitrogen is low, its uptake by the root decreases, and cytokinin synthesis drops sharply. Less “growth signal” reaches the shoot. This leads to:
- slowed shoot and leaf growth;
- yellowing and senescence of lower leaves (nitrogen is remobilised from old organs to young ones);
- redistribution of resources in favour of the root system—the plant begins to grow roots more actively to find nitrogen.
Thus, the cytokinin signal is an indicator of the nitrogen status of the soil. It allows the shoot to “know” whether to invest energy in above‑ground growth (Engels et al., 2012).
Important: Nitrogen is not the only factor. Cytokinin synthesis is also stimulated by phosphorus and potassium, so overall cytokinins reflect the general level of mineral nutrition (Marschner, 2012).
Signal about water stress: abscisic acid (ABA)
What happens in the root. Abscisic acid is a classic stress hormone. When the root experiences water deficit (due to soil drying, salinity, or chilling), ABA synthesis in root tips sharply increases (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
The reason is simple: under water shortage, root cells lose turgor, their membranes become destabilised. This triggers enzymatic cascades leading to ABA formation from carotenoid precursors. ABA is actively loaded into the xylem and quickly reaches the leaves.
What information the signal carries. ABA delivers a clear message to the shoot: “Water in the soil is becoming scarce. Close stomata immediately, reduce transpiration, slow growth. Water is a critical resource.”
In leaves, ABA causes a set of rapid responses:
- Stomatal closure — the main effect. ABA activates anion channels in the plasma membrane of guard cells, causing efflux of \mathrm{K+} and \mathrm{Cl-}, loss of turgor, and closure of the stomatal pore. Transpiration drops sharply (Medvedev, 2012).
- Growth inhibition — ABA suppresses cell division and elongation in young leaves and stems, especially under drought.
- Activation of protective protein synthesis (LEA proteins)—these protect cells from dehydration.
- Stimulation of root growth — in the root system, ABA can paradoxically stimulate growth (so the plant “throws resources” into finding water).
An important nuance: ABA from the root is not the only source. In the shoot itself, ABA is also synthesised under water stress. But the root signal often precedes local synthesis and serves as a “warning” that prepares the shoot for impending danger (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Signal about mechanical resistance: ethylene
What happens in the root. Ethylene is a gaseous hormone synthesised in many tissues, but in the root its synthesis is activated under mechanical resistance (compacted soil, stones) or under anaerobic conditions (flooding) (Medvedev, 2012).
What information the signal carries. Ethylene from the root can spread through intercellular spaces and via vessels to the shoot, signalling: “There is a mechanical obstacle or oxygen deficiency. Change the pattern of growth.”
In the shoot, ethylene causes a characteristic “triple response” (especially in dicots):
- slowing of elongation growth;
- stem thickening (radial growth);
- change in growth orientation (horizontal growth or epinasty—leaf drooping).
Thus, the ethylene signal is a signal for growth reorganisation in response to physical barriers or lack of air.
In addition, ethylene coming from the root can influence leaf senescence and fruit abscission, though these effects are more often associated with local synthesis.
Signal about pathogens: jasmonic and salicylic acids
What happens in the root. When the root is attacked by soil pathogens (fungi, bacteria, nematodes), defence responses are triggered in infected cells, accompanied by synthesis of jasmonic and salicylic acids—key signalling molecules of systemic acquired resistance (Medvedev, 2012).
What information the signal carries. These substances, entering the xylem and reaching the shoot, report: “There is a pathogen in the soil. Activate the general defence programme.”
In the shoot, jasmonate and salicylate activate expression of genes encoding:
- protease inhibitors (protection against herbivorous insects);
- phytoalexins (antimicrobial substances);
- enzymes strengthening cell walls (lignin, suberin);
- enzymes involved in the hypersensitive response (local cell death around the pathogen).
This allows the shoot to “prepare” for possible attack by the same pathogens that may spread through the vessels.
Summary: what do hormonal signals carry?
| Hormone | Information transmitted to the shoot | Main shoot response |
|---|---|---|
| Cytokinins | “Nitrogen (and mineral nutrition in general) is sufficient” | Growth, cell division, delayed senescence |
| Abscisic acid | “Water in the soil is scarce—stress” | Stomatal closure, growth slowdown |
| Ethylene | “There is a mechanical obstacle or anaerobiosis” | Change in growth pattern (triple response) |
| Jasmonate / Salicylate | “There is a pathogen—prepare defence” | Activation of defence genes |
Important note: multiplicity of signals and cross‑talk
We have considered the main hormonal signals separately, but in a real plant they do not act in isolation. For example, during drought, ABA synthesis increases and cytokinin synthesis may decrease. It is the balance of hormones that determines the final response of the shoot. Not the absolute content, but the ratio (e.g., ABA/cytokinins) is an informative signal (Medvedev, 2012).
Moreover, hormonal signals interact with hydraulic and trophic ones, creating an integrated control system (this will be discussed in the next lecture).
Key conclusion: Hormonal signals from the root to the shoot are chemical messages containing specific information about the soil condition: nitrogen availability, water stress, mechanical obstacles, presence of pathogens. Each hormone is a separate communication channel, and their interaction creates a complex signalling network that ensures adequate adaptation of the shoot to root conditions.
2.2 Hydraulic signals: the fastest communication channel
Now we move to the fastest way to transmit information from root to shoot—hydraulic signals. This is a communication channel that does not require synthesis of new molecules, does not depend on the speed of substance transport, and acts almost instantaneously.
What is a hydraulic signal?
Water moves through xylem vessels from root to leaves under negative pressure (tension). This tension is created by transpiration—evaporation of water from leaves into the atmosphere. The more intense the transpiration, the stronger the “suction force” that pulls water from the root (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Imagine a continuous water column filling the xylem vessels from roots to the most distant leaves. This column is under tension—like a rubber band that is stretched and about to snap. Any change at one end of this system is instantly transmitted to the other end.
When the root begins to absorb less water (due to soil drying, salinity, chilling), the balance between supply and evaporation is disturbed. The tension in the water column increases—pressure in the xylem drops. This pressure change propagates at enormous speed along the entire xylem, from root to the farthest leaves (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Brodribb et al., 2015).
This is a hydraulic signal—a change in hydrostatic pressure in the water‑conducting system that carries information about water supply disruption.
Information carried by the hydraulic signal
The hydraulic signal is an alarm signal of the most general nature. It tells the shoot only one fact:
“Less water is coming in!”
This signal does not contain information about the cause of the disturbance (drought, salinity, root cooling, mechanical damage to vessels). It does not indicate the scale of the problem. It simply states the fact: the “supply‑evaporation” balance is disturbed.
However, precisely because of this “poverty” of content, the hydraulic signal becomes the fastest. It needs no time for molecule synthesis, loading into vessels, or transport. It is the change in the physical state of water itself.
Example: sudden wilting
A classic example of the hydraulic signal in action is the plant’s response to sudden soil drying. If, on a bright sunny day, the roots suddenly stop receiving water, the leaves lose turgor and begin to wilt within minutes. Stomata close almost instantaneously (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
In this case, the hormonal signal (ABA) has not yet been synthesised in the root and reached the leaves. The hydraulic signal—the pressure drop in the xylem—is at work. The water supply disruption is “felt” by the leaves directly, without intermediaries.
Why is the hydraulic signal the fastest?
The speed of propagation of the hydraulic signal is determined by the speed of water movement in xylem vessels. This speed varies among plants and conditions but typically ranges from 10 to 150 metres per hour (Brodribb et al., 2015). For comparison:
| Signal type | Propagation speed |
|---|---|
| Hydraulic | 10–150 m/h (instantaneous for plant tissues) |
| Hormonal (with xylem flow) | 0.1–1 m/h (speed of ascending water flow) |
| Hormone diffusion in tissues | mm/h – cm/h |
Why is the hydraulic signal so much faster than the hormonal one? Because:
1. It is a physical, not chemical, phenomenon. Pressure change is a change in the state of water, not movement of messenger molecules. It requires no synthesis time.
2. Transmission occurs along a continuous water column. Xylem is a continuous system of capillaries from root to leaf. A pressure change at one point is instantly (within hydrodynamics) transmitted throughout the system.
3. No active transport is needed. The signal moves passively, along with water, without energy expenditure.
That is why the hydraulic signal acts in seconds, while the hormonal one requires minutes or even hours.
Hydraulic signal and cavitation
Under very severe water stress, the tension in the xylem can become critical. The water in the vessels is in a metastable state—highly stretched and ready to break. If the tension exceeds a certain threshold, air bubbles form in the water column—this phenomenon is called cavitation (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Brodribb et al., 2015).
Cavitation is not just a hydraulic signal; it is a rupture of the water column. Bubbles block water flow, and the vessel becomes non‑conducting. This can lead to irreversible damage to the conducting system, especially if cavitation affects many vessels.
Cavitation as a signal of critical stress
Cavitation is an alarm of the highest level. It tells the shoot: “Water supply is critically disrupted—tissue death may occur.”
Plants can “hear” cavitation. When bubbles form, microscopic acoustic vibrations (ultrasound) occur, which have been recorded in experiments. These signals can serve as an additional indicator of stress.
However, it is important to understand: cavitation is damage, not just a signal. It can lead to dieback of entire branches, especially in trees. Therefore, many plants have strategies to prevent cavitation:
- Early stomatal closure—the hydraulic signal acts before tension becomes critical.
- Narrow vessels—in narrow vessels, cavitation occurs at higher tension (capillary effect).
- Presence of alternative conducting paths—if one vessel cavitates, water can bypass it through neighbouring ones.
Hydraulic signal and local decisions
The hydraulic signal acts on the whole plant, but it can be locally modified. For example, pressure change in an individual root tip can affect local water and ion uptake. This transitions to the topic of local decisions (see Section 4), which the plant makes at the level of individual organs.
Link between hydraulic and hormonal signals
Hydraulic and hormonal signals under stress often act sequentially:
1. Hydraulic signal—instantaneous stomatal closure upon pressure drop in xylem (seconds).
2. Hormonal signal (ABA)—synthesised in the root in response to stress, reaches leaves and keeps stomata closed for a longer time (minutes–hours).
Thus, the hydraulic signal provides a rapid, and the hormonal a sustained, response. This is a reliable system that does not allow the plant to “miss” water deficit.
Key conclusion:
- The hydraulic signal is the fastest way to transmit information from root to shoot. It is a change in pressure in the water column of the xylem.
- It carries minimum information (“water supply disrupted”) but acts almost instantly.
- The speed of the hydraulic signal is thousands of times greater than that of the hormonal signal, making it indispensable for emergency responses (e.g., stomatal closure during sudden drought).
- The critical level of the hydraulic signal—cavitation (rupture of the water column)—is a signal of irreversible damage to the conducting system.
2.3 Trophic signals: information in the flow of substances
We have examined two types of signals from root to shoot: hormonal (specific chemical information) and hydraulic (instant alarm signal). Now we turn to the third, most fundamental but slowest communication channel—trophic signals.
Trophic signals are information encoded in the flow of nutrients moving through the plant. These are not specially synthesised messenger molecules, but the very “products” and “raw materials” of metabolism, whose concentration and ratios carry information about the state of the organism (Engels et al., 2012; Medvedev, 2012).
What is a trophic signal?
A trophic (from Greek trophē — nourishment) signal is a change in concentration, composition, or ratio of nutrients in conducting tissues, which is perceived by target cells as information about the resource status of the organism.
Unlike hormonal signals, trophic signals do not require specific receptors for each substance. Cells “sense” the concentration of metabolites (sugars, amino acids, ions) through already existing systems of transport and metabolism. This is an economical and reliable way to transmit information.
Sugars as a trophic signal: the “energy code”
The flow of sucrose from leaves to the root. The main flow of organic substances in the plant moves through the phloem—from leaves (sources of photosynthates) to roots and other heterotrophic organs (sinks). Sucrose is the main transport form of carbohydrates in most plants (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Taiz et al., 2023).
This flow is not just nutrition for the root. It is information about the state of the shoot. The more intense the photosynthesis, the more sucrose is synthesised in the leaves and the more reaches the root.
What information does the sugar flow carry? The root “evaluates” the concentration of sucrose arriving via the phloem and receives the signal:
“Photosynthesis is active. There is plenty of energy. We can intensify mineral uptake, develop the root system, store carbohydrates” (Engels et al., 2012).
When the sugar flow decreases (due to cloudy weather, drought, leaf ageing, damage to leaf surface), the root receives the opposite signal:
“There is little energy. Need to economise. Reduce uptake activity, slow growth” (Medvedev, 2012).
Example: defoliation as a strong trophic signal
Defoliation (leaf removal) is a classic experiment demonstrating trophic signalling. When we remove leaves, we stop sugar supply to the root. The root “understands” that the shoot cannot support it. In response:
- mineral ion uptake sharply decreases;
- root growth slows or stops completely;
- some roots may die (remobilisation of their resources occurs).
This is not just “starvation” of the root. It is receiving information that the photosynthetic system is damaged or insufficiently active. The root adapts to the new situation by reallocating resources.
Carbohydrates as regulators of gene expression
Modern research shows that sugars (especially glucose and sucrose) act as signalling molecules regulating the expression of thousands of genes (Taiz et al., 2023; Engels et al., 2012).
At high sugar concentrations in cells:
- photosynthetic genes are repressed (why synthesise photosynthetic proteins if sugars are already abundant?);
- genes related to storage compound synthesis (starch, proteins) and sugar utilisation for growth are activated.
At low sugar concentrations:
- photosynthetic genes are activated (more carbohydrates need to be produced);
- genes for mobilisation of reserves are activated (starch is broken down to provide energy).
Thus, sugars are not only “fuel” but also a regulatory signal linking the level of photosynthesis with the metabolic needs of the organism. And this signal is transmitted from shoot to root via the phloem sap flow.
Mineral ions as trophic signals
Not only organic substances but also mineral ions moving through the xylem from root to shoot carry information.
Nitrogen (nitrates) as a signal. The concentration of nitrates in xylem sap is a direct signal to the shoot about how much nitrogen is available in the soil. An increased nitrate concentration activates:
- synthesis of nitrate reductase and other enzymes of nitrogen metabolism;
- synthesis of amino acids and proteins;
- shoot growth and development.
At low nitrate concentration, the shoot “understands” that nitrogen is scarce and switches metabolism to an economy mode: growth slows, senescence of lower leaves accelerates, from which nitrogen is mobilised for young organs (Engels et al., 2012).
Phosphates as a signal. Phosphate signalling is also important. Under phosphorus deficiency, less phosphate reaches the shoot. This triggers adaptation programmes to phosphorus starvation in the shoot: changes in gene expression, phosphatase synthesis, mobilisation of phosphorus from old tissues.
Ion ratios. Not only absolute concentration but also the ratio of ions can be informative. For example, the potassium‑to‑sodium ratio in xylem sap indicates the degree of soil salinisation.
Amino acids and other metabolites as signals
The flow of amino acids from root to shoot and back is also a trophic signal. A high concentration of amino acids in phloem sap may indicate active protein synthesis in the root or protein breakdown in senescing tissues.
Especially important is the flow of glutamine and asparagine—the main transport forms of organic nitrogen in many plants. Their concentration is an indicator of nitrogen status and nitrogen metabolism activity (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Comparison of the three types of signals from root to shoot
| Characteristic | Hydraulic | Hormonal | Trophic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature | Physical pressure change | Chemical messenger molecules | Concentration of nutrients |
| Speed | Instant (seconds) | Moderate (minutes–hours) | Slow (hours–days) |
| Information | “Water is low!” (only fact) | “This is what kind of stress” | “This is how many resources are available” |
| Specificity | Low | High | Medium (quantity, not type) |
| Requires synthesis | No | Yes | No (uses already existing metabolites) |
Interaction of the three signal types: drought
Let us see how the three signal types work together in the example of drought:
1. Hydraulic signal (seconds): pressure in xylem drops → stomata close instantly.
2. Hormonal signal (ABA) (minutes): root synthesises ABA → ABA reaches leaves → stomata remain closed, long‑term adaptive responses are triggered (synthesis of protective proteins, changes in gene expression).
3. Trophic signal (hours–days): stomatal closure limits CO2 uptake → photosynthesis slows → less sugars reach the root → the root “understands” that the shoot cannot supply it with energy → reduces uptake and growth.
Thus, all three channels work as a single system, providing rapid (hydraulic), sustained (hormonal), and long‑term (trophic) adaptation (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Trophic signals and regulation of source‑sink relationships
Understanding trophic signals is closely linked to the concept of sources and sinks. Leaves are sources of photosynthates (sucrose). Roots are typical sinks that use these sugars for growth and ion uptake.
The trophic signal (sugar flow) is the main regulator of the balance between sources and sinks. If sources produce many sugars (intense photosynthesis), sinks receive a signal “you can grow”. If sources are weakened, sinks receive a signal “save energy” (Engels et al., 2012).
This principle underlies the distribution of assimilates in the plant and largely determines its productivity.
Key conclusion:
- Trophic signals are information encoded in the concentration of nutrients (sugars, amino acids, ions) in conducting tissues.
- The flow of sucrose from leaves to the root is the main trophic signal, informing the root about the state of photosynthesis and energy availability.
- Ions (especially nitrates and phosphates) also serve as trophic signals, informing the shoot about the mineral status of the soil.
- Trophic signals are the slowest but most informative: they show the scale of a problem or well‑being.
- Trophic signals underlie the regulation of source‑sink relationships and determine resource allocation in the plant.
3. What does the shoot tell the root?
We have thoroughly examined the signals coming from the root to the shoot. However, communication in the plant is a two‑way process. The shoot not only receives information from the root system but also actively sends signals about its own state to the root. Without this feedback, the root could not adequately regulate its activity.
The main signals that the shoot sends to the root can be divided into trophic (flow of organic substances), hormonal, and senescence signals. Let us consider each.
3.1 Trophic signal from the shoot: the flow of sucrose
The main “language” of the shoot is carbohydrates. As we have already said, the bulk of organic substances synthesised in the leaves are transported via the phloem to the roots. This is not just nutrition for the root system. It is its main source of information about the state of the photosynthetic apparatus.
What information does the sugar flow carry? By the concentration of sucrose in the phloem sap, the root “evaluates”:
- the intensity of photosynthesis in the shoot;
- presence of stress factors affecting photosynthesis (drought, shading, diseases);
- the overall energy supply of the organism (Engels et al., 2012).
If many sugars arrive—the root receives the signal: “Photosynthesis is going well, there is enough energy. You can actively absorb mineral elements, increase root mass, store carbohydrates.”
If sugars are scarce—the signal changes: “Photosynthesis is weakened, there is not enough energy. Reduce uptake, economise resources, die back if necessary” (Medvedev, 2012).
Classic example: defoliation
Defoliation is the most vivid experiment demonstrating the trophic signal from shoot to root. When we remove leaves (completely or partially), we sharply reduce sugar supply to the root. The root “understands” that the shoot cannot support it. In response, the following occurs:
1. Mineral ion uptake (especially nitrogen and phosphorus) sharply decreases.
2. Root growth slows or stops completely.
3. Some roots begin to die, especially old and fine ones (remobilisation of their resources—mobilisation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbohydrates from roots to the shoot) (Engels et al., 2012).
This is not just “starvation” of the root. It is an informational response: the root receives a signal that the shoot can no longer supply it with energy and reorganises its activity.
Reverse effect: If photosynthesis is increased (e.g., by raising light intensity or CO2 concentration), the sugar flow to the root increases. The root receives the signal “you can grow” and enhances nutrient uptake, which may ultimately increase yield.
3.2 Hormonal signals from shoot to root
The shoot synthesises several phytohormones that are transported to the root and influence its growth and development. The main one is auxin.
Auxin from young leaves and the shoot apex. The main site of synthesis of indole‑3‑acetic acid (IAA) is young, actively growing leaves and the shoot apical meristem. From there, auxin is transported polarly—basipetally (down the stem)—and reaches the root system (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
What information does auxin carry to the root? The arrival of auxin from the shoot to the root is a signal of how active shoot growth is. Auxin performs several functions in the root:
- Regulation of root branching. Auxin stimulates the initiation and development of lateral roots. The more auxin comes from the shoot, the more lateral roots are formed. This coordinates root system growth with shoot needs: the more actively the shoot grows, the more it needs water and minerals (Medvedev, 2012).
- Inhibition of lateral bud growth in roots. In some plants, auxin suppresses the formation of adventitious buds on roots, maintaining shoot apical dominance.
- Stimulation of root elongation (at very low concentrations; at high concentrations, it inhibits).
Thus, the auxin signal from the shoot tells the root: “The shoot is growing. I need more water and minerals. Develop the root system” (Medvedev, 2012).
Influence of cytokinins. Although cytokinins are mainly synthesised in the root and move to the shoot, some of them are also synthesised in the shoot (e.g., in young leaves). They can affect the root by stimulating cell division in meristems and branching.
3.3 Senescence signals and nitrogen remobilisation
What happens during leaf senescence. When a leaf reaches a certain age, a senescence programme is activated. This is not passive decay but an active, genetically controlled process. During senescence:
- chlorophyll and proteins (especially Rubisco) break down;
- amino acids and other breakdown products are transported from the senescing leaf via the phloem to the root and young organs (Medvedev, 2012; Engels et al., 2012).
What information does the senescence signal carry? The senescing leaf sends a message to the root: “I am finishing my work. Take my nitrogen, phosphorus, and other elements—use them for growth of new organs.”
This is a signal of remobilisation (re‑use) of mineral elements. For the root, this means it receives an additional source of nitrogen and phosphorus that can be directed to new root growth or used for synthesis of its own proteins.
Senescence signal and resource redistribution
It is important to understand: leaf senescence is not just a loss. It is part of the plant’s survival strategy. When nitrogen in the soil is scarce, the plant may accelerate senescence of lower leaves to mobilise nitrogen from them and redistribute it to young leaves and roots (Engels et al., 2012).
Thus, the root receives information that resource reorganisation is occurring in the shoot. This allows the root to coordinate its uptake and distribution of mineral substances.
3.4 What else does the shoot transmit to the root?
Thermal signal. Leaves heated by the sun create a thermal gradient that affects the flow of water and minerals. However, this is more of a physical than chemical effect.
Electrical signals. In some plants, action potentials have been recorded that can spread from leaves to roots, for example, upon mechanical damage. This is a fast alarm signal, although its role in regulating root activity is not yet fully understood.
3.5 Integration of shoot signals in the root
The root constantly evaluates several types of signals coming from the shoot:
- Sucrose flow—indicates the intensity of photosynthesis and energy supply.
- Auxin concentration—reports the rate of shoot growth.
- Flow of amino acids and amides from senescing leaves—signals nitrogen remobilisation.
Based on this information, the root makes “decisions”:
- Should it enhance mineral ion uptake?
- Should it increase root mass?
- Should it economise or grow actively?
- When is it time to enter dormancy?
All these decisions are made locally in the root system, but based on information received from the shoot.
Comparison of signals: root to shoot and shoot to root
| Direction | Signal type | What it reports |
|---|---|---|
| Root → Shoot | Hormonal (cytokinins) | “Nitrogen is sufficient—grow” |
| Root → Shoot | Hormonal (ABA) | “Water is scarce—close stomata” |
| Root → Shoot | Hormonal (ethylene) | “Mechanical resistance—change growth” |
| Root → Shoot | Hydraulic | “Water supply disrupted—respond urgently” |
| Root → Shoot | Trophic (ions) | “This is how many minerals are available” |
| Shoot → Root | Trophic (sucrose) | “Photosynthesis is proceeding at this intensity” |
| Shoot → Root | Hormonal (auxin) | “The shoot is growing like this—develop roots” |
| Shoot → Root | Senescence signal | “I am senescing—take my nitrogen” |
Key conclusion:
- The shoot actively reports its state to the root, and the main channel of this information is the flow of sucrose through the phloem. The root “knows” about the intensity of photosynthesis and adjusts its activity depending on carbohydrate supply.
- Auxin from the shoot apex stimulates root development, coordinating root system growth with shoot growth.
- Senescing leaves send amino acids and other breakdown products to the root, signalling remobilisation of elements.
- This entire system of signals ensures coordination between above‑ground and below‑ground parts, allowing the plant to function as a single whole.
4. Why can the plant make local decisions?
We have already seen that the plant is a complex communication system in which the root and shoot constantly exchange signals. It would seem that such a developed “central communication” should mean that all decisions are made at the top level, and roots and leaves merely execute commands. However, the reality is quite different.
The plant is a decentralised system in which every organ, every tissue region is capable of independently assessing the local situation and making decisions without waiting for “instructions” from other parts. This ability is a key adaptation to a sessile lifestyle and to the extreme heterogeneity of the environment.
Why are local decisions necessary?
Imagine the soil. It is never homogeneous. In one place there is more moisture, in another more nitrogen, in a third a dense layer, in a fourth a pathogen. If the root could only respond to signals coming from the shoot, its response would be too slow and coarse. It could not effectively utilise rich patches and avoid unfavourable ones (Marschner, 2012).
Local decisions allow the plant to:
- Respond quickly to local changes in the soil (seconds and minutes, not hours).
- Fine‑tune to micro‑zones with different resource availability.
- Save resources—not waste energy on reactions that are not needed in a given location.
- Avoid damage—locally block the spread of pathogens or toxic substances.
Examples of local decisions in the root system
1. Local enhancement of growth in nutrient‑rich patches
Roots have an amazing ability to branch selectively in those soil patches where the concentration of nutrients (especially nitrogen and phosphorus) is higher. This phenomenon is called root architectural plasticity (Marschner, 2012).
How does it work? A local increase in nitrate or phosphate concentration is directly perceived by cells of the root tip. This triggers local hormone synthesis (e.g., auxin) and activation of genes responsible for pericycle cell division. As a result, lateral roots begin to form precisely in that region (Medvedev, 2012).
Important: This process does not require a signal from the shoot. It is initiated and controlled locally. The shoot may not even “know” that the root has found a rich patch, but the root already uses that advantage.
2. Local changes in uptake and exudate release
Under local phosphorus deficiency, roots can release organic acids (citric, malic, oxalic) and phosphatases into the rhizosphere. These substances solubilise insoluble soil phosphates, making phosphorus available for uptake (Marschner, 2012).
This is also a local decision. Only those root segments that encounter phosphorus deficiency activate synthesis and release of these compounds. Other segments, where phosphorus is sufficient, do not do this. This saves energy and resources.
Similarly, under local iron deficiency, roots release phytosiderophores (in grasses) or acidify the rhizosphere (in dicots) to mobilise iron. These responses are strictly localised to zones experiencing deficiency (Marschner, 2012).
3. Local response to pathogens and mechanical damage
Upon local pathogen penetration into the root, it is the affected region that triggers the hypersensitive response—programmed cell death around the infection site to isolate and destroy the pathogen. This occurs without shoot involvement (Medvedev, 2012).
Upon mechanical damage to the root (e.g., cutting), ethylene and other signals are locally activated, stimulating healing and formation of new roots.
4. Local regulation of water potential and osmosis
Roots can locally change their osmotic concentration to maintain water uptake even in saline patches. This is achieved by accumulation of osmotically active substances (proline, sugars, ions) precisely in those cells that contact saline soil (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
How do local decisions work? Molecular mechanisms
Local decisions are based on local perception of signals and local regulation of gene expression. Key elements:
- Receptors and sensors in the plasma membrane of root cells perceive changes in ion concentration, water, and presence of pathogens.
- Local signalling cascades (e.g., calcium, protein phosphorylation) are triggered within a cell or group of cells.
- Changes in gene transcription occur locally, without signal spread to the whole organism.
It is important to understand: local decisions do not mean complete autonomy. They are integrated with general signals from the shoot. For example, local root branching in a nitrogen‑rich patch is enhanced if the overall levels of cytokinins (from the root) and sucrose (from the shoot) are high. If the plant as a whole is under stress, local responses may be suppressed (Engels et al., 2012).
Local decisions in the shoot
Not only roots but also shoots are capable of local decisions. For example:
- A photosynthesising leaf can locally regulate stomatal opening in response to light, humidity, and CO2 concentration. This occurs without involvement of other leaves (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
- The apical meristem makes local decisions about forming leaves or flowers depending on local hormonal gradients (Medvedev, 2012).
- Local leaf senescence can be accelerated or slowed depending on local cytokinin and nitrogen levels.
Relationship between local decisions and long‑distance communication
It may seem that local decisions contradict the idea of organismal integrity. In fact, they complement it.
Local decisions are “tactics,” and long‑distance signals are “strategy.” The plant uses local responses for rapid adaptation to local conditions, but general signals (from root to shoot and back) set the “framework” within which these local decisions are made.
For example:
- Local root branching in a rich patch does not occur if the plant as a whole is under severe water deficit (the shoot sends an ABA signal).
- Local stomatal closure can be overridden if the shoot receives a signal from the root about sufficient water supply.
Thus, local decisions are not anarchy, but a decentralised but coordinated control system.
Why is decentralisation an advantage?
- Speed. Local responses occur much faster than those requiring signal transmission over distance.
- Energy saving. No need to synthesise and transport signalling molecules over long distances.
- Accuracy. The response precisely matches the local situation.
- Reliability. Damage to one region does not paralyse the entire system (as would happen with rigid central control).
It is precisely decentralisation that allows the plant to survive in a variable and heterogeneous environment, where every millimetre of soil may differ in properties.
Key conclusion:
- The plant is capable of making local decisions at the level of individual organs and even tissue regions.
- Local decisions provide rapid, precise, and economical adaptation to environmental heterogeneity.
- Mechanisms of local decisions include local signal perception, local gene expression regulation, and local metabolic changes.
- Local decisions do not contradict organismal integrity—they are integrated with long‑distance signals and represent a “tactical” level of control subordinate to the overall “strategy.”
5. Why is such complex communication needed?
We have examined numerous signals: hormonal, hydraulic, trophic; signals from root to shoot and from shoot to root; local decisions that the plant makes independently. A natural question arises: why does the plant need such a complex, multi‑level communication system? Wouldn’t it be simpler to manage everything from a single “centre”?
The answer lies in the very nature of the plant as an organism. Unlike animals, plants have no central nervous system, no brain, no endocrine glands. Their “intelligence” is distributed throughout the body. And it is precisely this decentralised but coordinated signalling system that allows the plant to function as a single whole while remaining flexible and adaptive (Medvedev, 2012).
5.1 Ensuring organismal integrity
Integrity is the ability of an organism to function as a single whole despite division of functions between organs. In plants, integrity is achieved not through a nervous system but through a continuous flow of information between root and shoot.
What does “integrity” mean for a plant?
- The root “knows” how much light the shoot receives (via sucrose flow).
- The shoot “knows” how much water and minerals are available to the root (via hormonal and trophic signals).
- All parts of the plant work in concert, adjusting to each other’s needs.
Without this communication, the plant would fall apart into autonomous parts: the root would absorb water independently of shoot needs, and the shoot would transpire independently of root capacity. Such a plant would quickly die.
Classic example: under drought, hydraulic and hormonal signals from the root force the shoot to close stomata. If this connection were absent, leaves would continue to evaporate water until it was completely exhausted, and the plant would dry out. Thanks to root signals, the shoot “understands” that water must be conserved (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
5.2 Coordination of growth and development
Above‑ground growth must be balanced with root system growth. If roots cannot supply the shoot with water and minerals, the shoot must slow its growth. If the shoot provides many photosynthates, roots can actively develop.
How is this balance achieved?
- Sucrose flow—the main regulator. The more sugars come from the shoot to the root, the more actively the root grows and absorbs ions. The fewer sugars, the more the root economises (Engels et al., 2012).
- Auxin from the shoot stimulates root branching, matching root system volume to the needs of the growing shoot (Medvedev, 2012).
- Cytokinins from the root stimulate shoot growth, informing it about nitrogen availability. If nitrogen is low, cytokinins are low, and shoot growth slows.
This mutual control through signals ensures an optimal root‑to‑shoot ratio, which changes depending on environmental conditions. Under drought or nitrogen deficiency, the plant invests more resources in roots; under abundant water and nitrogen, in shoots.
5.3 Adaptation to changing conditions
The plant cannot escape unfavourable conditions. Its only strategy is adaptation. But adaptation must be rapid and adequate. Communication allows the plant to:
- Anticipate changes (e.g., ABA from the root “warns” the shoot of impending drought before leaves lose turgor).
- Redistribute resources in favour of the most needy organs (e.g., under nitrogen deficiency, the plant accelerates senescence of lower leaves and directs nitrogen to roots).
- Respond locally to local problems (e.g., branching in nutrient‑rich patches) without disrupting the overall strategy.
Example of integrated adaptation—drought (repeated for reinforcement):
| Stage | Signal | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Onset of drought | Hydraulic (instant) | Stomatal closure, reduced transpiration |
| Development of drought | Hormonal (ABA from root) | Sustained stomatal closure, synthesis of protective proteins |
| Prolonged drought | Trophic (less sucrose to root) | Reduced uptake and root growth, some root dieback |
| Recovery of water supply | Hydraulic + hormonal | Stomatal opening, resumption of growth |
All three signal types work together to ensure plant survival. None alone would be sufficient (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
5.4 Decentralisation and reliability
Another reason for communication complexity is reliability. If the plant had a single control centre, damage to that centre would lead to death of the whole organism. A decentralised system, where each organ can make local decisions, is much more robust.
What does decentralisation provide?
- Fault tolerance. Damage to one root does not stop the entire root system. Other roots continue to absorb water and nutrients.
- Flexibility. Each root segment can adapt to its local conditions without waiting for a “command” from the centre.
- Energy saving. Local responses require less energy than global reorganisations of the whole organism.
At the same time, local decisions do not contradict integrity. They are integrated with general signals (e.g., sucrose and cytokinin levels set the “framework” for local decisions). This resembles a decentralised computer network, where each node is autonomous but follows common protocols.
5.5 Communication as the basis for integration of physiological processes
We have arrived at the main conclusion of the entire lecture. Long‑distance communication is the basis for integration of all physiological processes in the plant.
Photosynthesis in leaves, water and ion uptake in roots, transport via xylem and phloem, growth and development, stress defence—all these processes are not isolated. They are linked in a single network through the signalling system.
Without communication there would be no:
- coordination between root and shoot;
- ability to adapt to environmental changes;
- organismal integrity;
- possibility of local response to soil heterogeneity.
The plant is not a sum of organs, but a single organism, and this unity is achieved through continuous information exchange.
5.6 What does understanding this system give us?
For the agronomist and plant physiologist, understanding long‑distance communication has practical value:
- Growth management. Knowing how signals affect growth, we can develop techniques to stimulate root system development or accelerate flowering.
- Enhanced stress tolerance. Understanding signalling pathways allows creation of varieties more resistant to drought, salinity, nitrogen deficiency.
- Optimised nutrition. Knowing that cytokinins signal nitrogen availability, we can adjust fertilisation regimes to maintain optimal hormonal balance.
- Prediction. By monitoring signals (e.g., ABA levels), we can diagnose stress at early stages.
Thus, knowledge of plant communication is not just academic interest. It is a tool for increasing the productivity and sustainability of agricultural crops.
General conclusion of the lecture
The root and shoot constantly exchange information using three types of signals:
- Hormonal — specific information about events (nitrogen availability, water stress, pathogens).
- Hydraulic — the fastest alarm signal about water supply disruption.
- Trophic — information about the quantity of available resources (sugars, ions).
These signals move in both directions: from root to shoot and from shoot to root, creating bidirectional communication.
The plant is capable of making local decisions at the level of individual organs, ensuring rapid and precise adaptation to environmental heterogeneity. But local decisions are integrated with general signals, preserving organismal integrity.
The complex communication system is necessary for coordination of growth, adaptation to stresses, and ensuring plant integrity. It is not “unnecessary complexity” but an evolutionarily developed survival mechanism in a variable and heterogeneous environment.
Understanding this system is the key to managing physiological processes and increasing plant productivity.
References
- Askari-Khorasgani, O., Pessarakli, M. (2019). ‘Drought-Induced Gene Expression Reprogramming Associated with Plant Metabolic Alterations and Adaptation’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 557-572.
- Brodribb, T.J., Holloway-Phillips, M., Bramley, H. (2015). ‘Improving water transport for carbon gain in crops’, in Crop Physiology. : Elsevier, 251-281.
- Engels, C., Kirkby, E., White, P. (2012). ‘Mineral Nutrition, Yield and Source–Sink Relationships’, in Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. : Elsevier, 85-133.
- Hopkins, W.G., Hüner, N.P..A. (2009). ‘Allocation, Translocation, and Partitioning of Photoassimilates’, in Introduction to Plant Physiology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 151-172.
- Kosová, K., Urban, M.Oldřich., Vítámvás, P., Prášil, I.Tom. (2019). ‘Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 207-230.
- Lambers, H., Oliveira, R.S. (2019). ‘Scaling-Up Gas Exchange and Energy Balance from the Leaf to the Canopy Level’, in Plant Physiological Ecology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 291-300.
- Marschner, P. (2012). ‘Rhizosphere Biology’, in Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. : Elsevier, 369-388.
- Neumann, G., Römheld, V. (2012). ‘Rhizosphere Chemistry in Relation to Plant Nutrition’, in Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. : Elsevier, 347-368.
- Sadras, V.O., Calderini, D.F. (2015). ‘Crop physiology: applications for breeding and agronomy’, in Crop Physiology. : Elsevier, 1-14.
- Schopfer, P., Brennicke, A. (2010). ‘Blütenbildung und Befruchtung’, in Pflanzenphysiologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 501-523.
- Schopfer, P., Brennicke, A. (2010). ‘Ferntransport von Wasser und anorganischen Ionen’, in Pflanzenphysiologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 311-331.
- Schopfer, P., Brennicke, A. (2010). ‘Ferntransport von organischen Molekülen’, in Pflanzenphysiologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 333-346.
- Sinclair, T.R. (1994). ‘Limits to Crop Yield?’, in Boote, K.J., Bennett, J.M., Sinclair, T.R., Paulsen, G.M. (ed.) Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield. Florida, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, pp. 509-532.
- Taiz, L., Møller, I.Max., Murphy, A., Zeiger, E. (2023). ‘Translocation in the Phloem’, in Plant Physiology and Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 345-378.
- Unsworth, M.H., Colls, J., Sanders, G.E. (1994). ‘Air Pollutants as Constraints for Crop Yields’, in Boote, K.J., Bennett, J.M., Sinclair, T.R., Paulsen, G.M. (ed.) Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield. Florida, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, pp. 467-486.
- Кузнецов, В.В. (2006). ‘Водный обмен растений [Water exchange in plants]’, in Физиология растений [Physiology of plants]. Москва: Высшая школа, pp. 143-202.
- Медведев, С.С. (2012). ‘Гормональная система растений [Hormonal system of plants]’, in Физиология растений [Physiology of plants]. Санкт-Петербург: БХВ-Петербург, pp. 263-328.
- Медведев, С.С. (2012). ‘Физиология роста и развития растений [Physiology of plant growth and development]’, in Физиология растений [Physiology of plants]. Санкт-Петербург: БХВ-Петербург, pp. 329-384.