Model stress factors
Plants, unlike motile animals, cannot escape adverse environmental impacts. Drought, heat, cold, soil salinity, flooding—all these factors constantly or periodically affect the plant organism. Survival under such conditions requires a complex and highly organized system of responses that allows the plant not only to survive but also to maintain its capacity for growth and reproduction (Medvedev, 2012).
The aim of today's lecture is to introduce you to the unified physiological scheme by which plants respond to various stress impacts. We will analyze five key model stress factors: drought, heat, cold, salinity, and hypoxia. Each stress will be examined using a unified scheme of five questions:
1. What is the primary disturbance? Which physical or chemical parameter goes beyond the normal range?
2. How does the plant perceive this? Which sensors or receptors are involved in primary signal perception?
3. How is the signal transmitted? Which universal signalling molecules and transduction pathways are involved?
4. What physiological response occurs? Which processes in the plant change first and what is the nature of these changes?
5. What is the outcome of the response? What are the possible consequences of the stress impact?
This approach will allow us to see the common patterns of stress responses and, at the same time, the specific mechanisms that the plant uses to adapt to each particular type of adverse condition.
---
1. Drought
Let us start with the most common and perhaps the most serious stress factor for terrestrial plants—water deficit, or drought.
1.1 What is the primary disturbance?
The primary event in the development of drought is a decrease in water potential of the soil and, consequently, of the plant itself. Water potential Ψ_w is a measure of the free energy of water. When water in the soil becomes less available, its water potential decreases, and water ceases to enter the roots.
In a plant under optimal conditions, cells are in a state of turgor—positive hydrostatic pressure created by the osmotic pressure of the cell sap against the cell wall. Turgor maintains organ shape, enables cell expansion growth, and drives stomatal function (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
Upon water loss, turgor pressure drops. This occurs because water leaves the cell along the water potential gradient: from the cell to the intercellular spaces and then to the atmosphere through stomata. The drop in turgor is the most rapid and sensitive parameter responding to water deficit. Indeed, it is the decrease in turgor that serves as the primary physical signal triggering a cascade of responses (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
As a "measuring instrument" for assessing the plant's water status, relative water content (RWC) is often used—the ratio of the actual water content in the tissue to the water content at full saturation. A decrease in RWC below a certain critical level signals the onset of drought.
1.2 How does the plant perceive this?
Perception of the water deficit signal is a complex, multi‑step process. It is believed that the main role here is played by osmosensors—protein structures in cell membranes that are sensitive to changes in turgor pressure or osmotic potential (Hopkins & Hüner, 2009).
The precise identification of osmosensors in higher plants remains an active area of research. However, it is well known that mechanosensitive ion channels in the plasma membrane are capable of responding to changes in membrane tension as turgor falls. When opened, these channels allow calcium ions (Ca²⁺) to enter the cytoplasm (Medvedev, 2012). Thus, the change in turgor is rapidly translated into an increase in cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentration, which acts as a universal signalling mediator.
In addition, roots perceive soil drying directly. Studies with split‑root systems have shown that roots in drying soil generate a signal that is transmitted to the leaves and causes stomatal closure even before the water potential in the leaves themselves changes (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
1.3 How is the signal transmitted?
The water‑deficit signal spreads through the plant via two main pathways: hydraulic (transmission of pressure changes in the xylem) and chemical.
Calcium (Ca²⁺) as a second messenger
An increase in cytosolic Ca²⁺ is one of the earliest events under stress. Calcium ions bind to calcium‑binding proteins—calmodulin and calcineurin‑B‑like proteins (CBL). These proteins, in turn, activate protein kinases, including Ca²⁺‑dependent protein kinases (CDPK) and CBL‑interacting protein kinases (CIPK) (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006). Kinase activation triggers a phosphorylation cascade of other target proteins.
Abscisic acid (ABA) as the main hormonal signal
Abscisic acid (ABA) is the key phytohormone mediating the plant's response to water deficit (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Hopkins & Hüner, 2009). Interestingly, ABA is synthesised both in roots and in leaves. Under drought conditions:
1. ABA synthesis is activated in roots;
2. ABA is transported via the xylem to the leaves;
3. Simultaneously, ABA synthesis is enhanced in the leaves themselves.
ABA synthesis from carotenoid precursors (violaxanthin) is catalysed by the enzyme NCED (9‑cis‑epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase). The activity of this enzyme increases sharply when water potential decreases.
In addition, the pH of xylem sap influences signal propagation. During drought, the pH of xylem sap can rise, which promotes the release of ABA from apoplastic stores (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
MAPK cascades
Mitogen‑activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are universal components of signalling pathways in eukaryotes. Activation of MAPK cascades is observed under water deficit and leads to phosphorylation of transcription factors (Kosová et al., 2020).
1.4 What physiological response occurs?
The plant's response to water deficit is multi‑level and includes both rapid and slower processes. The most important ones are:
Stomatal closure
This is the fastest and most effective protective reaction (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Hopkins & Hüner, 2009). Under the influence of ABA in guard cells:
1. Efflux of K⁺ and Cl⁻ anions occurs;
2. Cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentration rises;
3. The membrane depolarises;
4. Guard cell turgor decreases;
5. The stomatal pore closes.
Stomatal closure sharply limits transpiration, reducing water loss, but at the same time reduces CO₂ uptake into the leaf.
Growth inhibition
Decreased turgor and altered hormone balance (increase in ABA, decrease in auxins and cytokinins) lead to inhibition of cell expansion (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006). Leaf and stem growth slows or stops—this is an adaptive response aimed at reducing the evaporative surface.
Osmotic regulation
Cells accumulate compatible osmolytes—low‑molecular‑weight organic substances that lower the cell water potential without disrupting metabolism (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). These include:
- Proline—one of the most important amino acids involved in osmoregulation;
- Glycine betaine—an effective osmoprotectant;
- Sugars (sucrose, fructans) and sugar alcohols (sorbitol, mannitol).
Osmolyte synthesis is activated at the transcriptional level. For example, the key enzyme of proline synthesis—pyrroline‑5‑carboxylate synthetase (P5CS)—is induced under drought (Sharma & Dubey, 2020).
Antioxidant defence
When stomata close, CO₂ entry into chloroplasts decreases, leading to over‑reduction of the photosynthetic electron transport chain and formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Antioxidant enzymes are activated: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, as well as non‑enzymatic antioxidants—ascorbate, glutathione, tocopherols (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Synthesis of stress proteins
In response to drought, the expression of genes encoding LEA proteins (Late Embryogenesis Abundant) and dehydrins is activated (Sharma & Dubey, 2020; Medvedev, 2012). These proteins are highly hydrophilic and perform protective functions:
- Stabilise membranes and proteins;
- Bind and retain water;
- Prevent aggregation of denatured proteins.
Changes in root‑to‑shoot ratio
Under prolonged drought, root growth may continue while shoot growth is inhibited. The root‑to‑shoot ratio increases—this allows the plant to increase the absorbing surface in search of water (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
1.5 What is the outcome of the response?
The outcome of the stress impact depends on the intensity and duration of the drought.
1. Recovery. If the water deficit was moderate and short‑lived, upon restoration of normal water supply the plant can fully return to its initial state. Stomata open, photosynthesis and growth resume. This process involves active repair of damaged proteins and membranes (Chapman & Huang, 2020).
2. Acclimation. Under prolonged or repeated exposure, the plant can increase its resistance—become hardened. As a result of acclimation:
- Osmolyte content increases;
- Membranes become more stable;
- Antioxidant system efficiency improves;
- Leaves develop xeromorphic structures (thicker cuticle, smaller cells).
3. Damage. Under too severe or prolonged drought, protective mechanisms become exhausted. Irreversible damage occurs:
- Protein denaturation;
- Lipid peroxidation of membranes;
- Disruption of chloroplast and mitochondrial structure;
- Tissue necrosis and plant death.
The cost of adaptation. In any case, even successful adaptation to drought has its price: energy and resources that could have been used for growth and yield accumulation are spent on the synthesis of protective proteins, osmolytes, and antioxidants. Therefore, plant productivity under stress conditions is always lower than the potential (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006; Sadras et al., 2015).
2. Heat
Let us move on to the second model stress factor—high temperature, or heat stress. In the context of global climate change, this factor is becoming one of the most significant for agriculture. Heat can act alone or in combination with drought, which multiplies the damaging effect.
It is important to emphasise immediately: heat stress is not simply "the plant is hot." It is a complex of physical and chemical disruptions at all levels of organisation—from molecular to the whole organism. The plant responds to heat with an elaborate adaptation programme centred on heat shock proteins, but also involving changes in membranes, metabolism, water relations, and antioxidant defence.
Let us analyse heat stress using our unified scheme.
2.1 What is the primary disturbance?
When the temperature rises above the optimal range for a given species, the first to suffer are proteins and membranes. The reason is the increase in thermal motion of molecules, which disrupts the weak interactions (hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds) that stabilise the three‑dimensional structure of biopolymers (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012).
Protein denaturation
Upon heating, proteins begin to unfold—lose their native conformation. This leads to:
- Loss of enzymatic activity;
- Exposure of hydrophobic patches that are normally buried inside the globule;
- Aggregation—clumping of denatured molecules via hydrophobic contacts.
Particularly sensitive to thermal denaturation are photosynthetic enzymes, primarily RuBisCO (the key enzyme of the C3 cycle) and RuBisCO activase, which is required for its activation (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006). Already at 35–40 °C, the activity of these enzymes begins to decline.
Damage to Photosystem II
One of the most sensitive targets of heat stress is Photosystem II (PSII)—the oxygen‑evolving complex located in the thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). The first to be damaged is the oxygen‑evolving complex (OEC)—the protein‑manganese cluster that catalyses water splitting. Upon heating to 40–45 °C, this complex is inactivated, leading to:
- Disruption of electron transfer from water to P680;
- Accumulation of reduced components of the electron transport chain;
- Formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
The PSII reaction centre also suffers, especially the D1 protein, which has the highest turnover among all plant proteins and constantly requires repair (Hopkins & Hüner, 2009).
Changes in membrane fluidity
At elevated temperatures, membrane lipids become more fluid. This disrupts:
- Function of membrane proteins—channels, carriers, receptors;
- Proton conductance of membranes;
- Coupling of electron transport with photophosphorylation and oxidative phosphorylation (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
As a result, ATP synthesis efficiency declines, and the cell experiences energy deficit.
Water deficit as a secondary factor
At high temperatures, transpiration increases sharply. If water uptake from the soil is limited, this leads to the development of water deficit—so‑called heat drought (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006). Thus, heat stress can trigger a cascade of secondary disturbances that amplify damage.
2.2 How does the plant perceive this?
Perception of the heat signal occurs through several channels. Since temperature is a physical parameter, sensors must respond to changes in the physical state of macromolecules and membranes.
Membrane fluidity as a primary sensor
According to current views, primary heat perception is linked to changes in membrane fluidity (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). Membrane lipids become more mobile upon heating. This change in the physical state of the membrane affects the conformation of embedded receptor proteins.
It is thought that receptor‑like kinases and two‑component histidine kinases act as thermal sensors, capable of changing their activity depending on the physical state of the lipid bilayer. In cyanobacteria, the histidine kinase Hik33, sensitive to changes in membrane fluidity upon heating, has been identified (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). In higher plants, similar mechanisms are currently being actively investigated.
Protein denaturation as a signal
Partially denatured proteins exposing hydrophobic patches serve as another signal. These "abnormal" proteins are recognised by cellular protein quality control systems, triggering signalling cascades and activation of protective programmes (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020).
Calcium signal
As with other stresses, heat stress causes a rapid influx of Ca²⁺ into the cytosol (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). Calcium acts as a universal second messenger, activating calcium‑dependent protein kinases and triggering phosphorylation cascades.
2.3 How is the signal transmitted?
The heat signal spreads through several parallel pathways, but the central event is the activation of heat shock factors (HSF) and the induction of heat shock protein (HSP) synthesis.
Heat shock factors (HSF)
Plants possess a large family of HSFs (19 to 52 genes in different species), divided into classes A, B, and C (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). Class A1 HSFs play a key role in the primary response—they are the "master regulators" of the heat shock response.
Mechanism of HSF activation (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006):
1. At normal temperature, HSF exists in the cytoplasm as an inactive monomer bound to molecular chaperones (primarily Hsp70 and Hsp90).
2. Upon temperature increase, these chaperones are "distracted" by binding to denatured proteins.
3. HSF is released, forms a homotrimer, and translocates to the nucleus.
4. In the nucleus, the HSF trimer binds to the heat shock element (HSE) in the promoter regions of HSP genes.
5. Transcription of HSP genes is initiated, and HSP mRNA can be detected within 3–5 minutes after the onset of heating (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Importantly, heat shock genes are intron‑less, meaning they do not require splicing. This ensures maximum speed of their activation—a critical condition for survival during rapid temperature increase (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Calcium‑dependent pathways
In parallel with the HSF pathway, calcium signals and MAPK cascades are activated (Kosová et al., 2020; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). They modulate the activity of HSFs and other transcription factors.
ABA and other phytohormones
Under heat stress, ABA content may also increase, although its role here is less pronounced than under drought (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006). ABA promotes stomatal closure, limiting water loss. Ethylene synthesis also increases, which participates in the regulation of defence responses.
2.4 What physiological response occurs?
The plant's response to heat stress is multi‑level and includes rapid (seconds–minutes) and slow (hours–days) components.
Synthesis of heat shock proteins (HSPs)
This is the central element of the heat response. HSPs are molecular chaperones that perform protective functions (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Main HSP families in plants:
| Family | Function |
|---|---|
| HSP100/ClpB | Dissolution of protein aggregates ("disaggregases"), remobilisation of denatured proteins |
| HSP90 | Stabilisation and regulation of client proteins (receptors, kinases), involvement in signalling pathways |
| HSP70/DnaK | Binding to partially denatured proteins, preventing aggregation, assisting refolding |
| HSP60 (chaperonins) | Assembly of oligomeric protein complexes, folding of newly synthesised proteins |
| Small HSPs (15–31 kDa) | "First line of defence"—binding to denatured proteins, maintaining them in a state accessible for refolding by other chaperones |
Particularly interesting are small HSPs—they are ATP‑independent holdases that create temporary depots for denatured proteins, preventing their aggregation. These proteins are then handed over to ATP‑dependent chaperone systems (Hsp70 and Hsp100) for refolding or degradation (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020).
It is important to note that not all HSPs are heat‑inducible. Some of them (e.g., Hsp70, Hsp90) are present constitutively—they are called heat shock cognate proteins (Hsc) and participate in normal protein folding, but their synthesis is also enhanced under stress (Kosová et al., 2020).
Changes in membrane lipid composition
Under prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures, membrane adaptation occurs: the content of saturated fatty acids increases, which reduces excessive membrane fluidity and increases their thermal stability (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). This process requires time and synthesis of new molecules.
Enhanced transpiration
Under short‑term heat, the plant may increase transpiration for leaf cooling. This is an effective mechanism, but it works only when water supply from the soil is sufficient. Under combined heat and drought, transpiration is limited by stomatal closure, and cooling becomes impossible.
Antioxidant defence
Under heat stress, as under other stresses, the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) increases, especially in chloroplasts due to PSII damage. Enzymatic and non‑enzymatic antioxidant systems are activated (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012). Synthesis of superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase is enhanced.
Inhibition of most protein synthesis
Under heat shock, synthesis of most "normal" proteins is sharply suppressed—this is a translational block. This block allows the cell to redirect resources to HSP synthesis and avoid synthesising proteins that could be damaged or assembled incorrectly at high temperature (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Acquisition of thermotolerance
Short‑term exposure to moderately high temperature (e.g., 38 °C for 30–60 minutes) makes the plant more resistant to critically high temperature (45–50 °C), which would normally be lethal. This phenomenon is called acquired thermotolerance (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). The level of thermotolerance positively correlates with the amount of accumulated HSPs and their persistence.
2.5 What is the outcome of the response?
The outcome of heat stress is determined by its intensity (temperature) and duration, as well as the plant's ability to acclimate.
Recovery
After relief of heat stress (return to optimal temperature):
1. HSP synthesis ceases—within minutes, HSP mRNA levels drop sharply.
2. Already synthesised HSPs are gradually degraded with half‑lives ranging from hours to days.
3. Normal protein synthesis resumes.
4. Damaged proteins are either refolded (with the help of HSPs) or targeted for proteasomal degradation (with the participation of ubiquitin, also induced by heat) (Nakamoto & Akter, 2020).
Importantly, short‑term heat stress may leave no visible damage if HSPs have had time to perform their protective function.
Acclimation (long‑term adaptation)
Under gradual or repeated exposure to elevated temperatures, the plant can acclimatise to heat. This manifests as:
1. Shift in the temperature optimum of photosynthesis towards higher temperatures. For example, in oleander grown at 20 °C and 45 °C, the temperature curves of photosynthesis shift accordingly, so that the optimum temperature matches the growth temperature (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
2. Changes in thermal stability of enzymes. Thermostable isoforms of enzymes appear; in cereals, a thermostable isoform of RuBisCO activase is induced, replacing the thermolabile one at high temperatures (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
3. Accumulation of "reserve" HSPs. In acclimated plants, the basal level of some HSPs may be elevated.
4. Membrane lipid adaptation.
Damage
At too high a temperature (usually >45–50 °C for most plants) or with too rapid heating (when HSPs do not have time to be synthesised), irreversible damage occurs:
1. Irreversible protein denaturation and aggregation;
2. Membrane destruction (excessive fluidity, loss of barrier function, ion leakage);
3. Inactivation of PSII and other key enzymes;
4. Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, cessation of ATP synthesis;
5. Tissue necrosis and plant death (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Cost of adaptation under heat stress: even successful acclimation requires energy expenditure for HSP synthesis and metabolic reorganisation, which reduces growth rate, productivity, and yield (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Key features of heat stress
1. Primary targets—proteins and membranes. Heat causes protein denaturation and changes in membrane fluidity.
2. Central protective mechanism—heat shock proteins. These are molecular chaperones synthesised via a specialised intron‑less gene system at maximum speed.
3. High sensitivity of photosynthesis. Photosystem II and RuBisCO are the most thermolabile components.
4. Two‑phase response: short‑term reaction (HSPs, stomatal closure) and long‑term acclimation (changes in lipid composition, shift of temperature optimum).
5. Interaction with water stress. Heat enhances transpiration and, under water shortage, causes heat drought, superimposing the two stresses.
Key terms (for this section)
- Heat stress — stress caused by elevated temperature.
- Thermotolerance — the ability of a plant to withstand high temperatures.
- Heat shock proteins (HSPs) — molecular chaperones synthesised in response to heat and other stresses, protecting proteins from denaturation and aggregation.
- Heat shock factor (HSF) — transcription factor that activates HSP genes.
- Heat shock element (HSE) — regulatory sequence in the promoter region of HSP genes.
- Acquired thermotolerance — increased resistance to critical temperature after prior exposure to moderate heat treatment.
- Translational block — suppression of most protein synthesis under heat shock, redirecting resources to HSP synthesis.
- Heat drought — water deficit arising as a consequence of increased transpiration at high temperature.
---
3. Cold
Let us move on to the third model stress factor—low temperatures. This is perhaps the most complex case to analyse, because the general term "cold" conceals two fundamentally different phenomena in terms of physical nature and damage mechanisms:
1. Chilling stress—the effect of low positive temperatures (usually 0 to +15 °C);
2. Freezing stress—the effect of negative temperatures (below 0 °C).
Different plant species have different sensitivities to these two types of impact. Heat‑loving (tropical and subtropical) species are damaged already at +10…+15 °C. Plants of temperate zones tolerate low positive temperatures well but may suffer from frosts. Winter cereals can withstand frosts down to –30…–35 °C, whereas potato dies already at –3…–5 °C (Li, 1994; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Therefore, when analysing cold stress, we will clearly distinguish these two cases, but also show their common features.
3.1 What is the primary disturbance?
The primary physical event upon cooling is a change in the physical state of membrane lipids. As temperature decreases, the lipid bilayer transitions from a liquid‑crystalline (fluid) state to a gel‑like (solid, quasi‑crystalline) state. This transition does not occur smoothly but abruptly at a certain temperature called the phase transition temperature (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012).
The phase transition temperature is determined by the fatty acid composition of membrane phospholipids:
- Saturated fatty acids (palmitic C16:0, stearic C18:0) raise the phase transition temperature;
- Unsaturated fatty acids (oleic C18:1, linoleic C18:2, linolenic C18:3) lower it.
In chilling‑sensitive plants, saturated fatty acids predominate in membranes, so the phase transition already occurs at +10…+15 °C. In cold‑tolerant species, the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids is higher, and the phase transition is shifted to 0 °C and below (Li, 1994; Medvedev, 2012).
What does the phase transition cause? The membrane loses fluidity, becomes rigid. This disrupts:
- Function of membrane proteins—ion channels, carriers, receptors;
- Activity of membrane‑bound enzymes;
- Barrier function of the membrane—passive leakage of ions and metabolites (especially K⁺) increases;
- Ability for active transport, which requires H⁺‑ATPase activity.
As a result, within hours at low positive temperature, sensitive plants show ion imbalance, disruption of energy metabolism, and general metabolic inhibition (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Special case: freezing
At negative temperatures, membrane disturbances are compounded by ice formation. Initially, ice forms extracellularly—in intercellular spaces and xylem vessels. This creates a very low water potential in the extracellular space, and water begins to leave the cells along the gradient. Cells dehydrate—freezing‑induced dehydration develops (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Li, 1994).
If cooling occurs slowly (as in nature in winter), cells have time to adapt to this dehydration. If rapid, ice forms inside cells, leading to mechanical disruption of membranes and cell death (Li, 1994; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Thus, under freezing stress, the primary disturbance is ice formation, and the secondary one is dehydration, similar to drought stress.
3.2 How does the plant perceive this?
Cold perception occurs through changes in membrane fluidity. This physical signal is transduced into a biochemical cascade.
Membrane sensors
It is believed that the primary cold sensors are two‑component histidine kinases and receptor‑like kinases embedded in the plasma membrane and endomembranes (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Kosová et al., 2020). In cyanobacteria, the best‑studied protein is Hik33, which senses changes in membrane fluidity. In higher plants, the protein COLD1 has been identified—it interacts with a G‑protein and is involved in cold perception in rice. Mutants in COLD1 lose the ability for cold acclimation (Kosová et al., 2020).
Mechanosensitive channels
Changes in membrane fluidity can activate mechanosensitive Ca²⁺ channels, leading to a rapid influx of calcium into the cytosol (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). Within seconds after cooling, a calcium wave can be detected.
Perception through changes in redox state
Upon cooling, the operation of electron transport chains in chloroplasts and mitochondria is disturbed, changing the cellular redox state. This can also serve as a signal perceived by redox‑sensitive proteins (Hopkins & Hüner, 2009).
3.3 How is the signal transmitted?
The cold signal spreads through several parallel pathways, which can be divided into ABA‑dependent and ABA‑independent.
Calcium signal and MAPK cascades
The influx of Ca²⁺ activates calcium‑binding proteins (calmodulin, CBL) and calcium‑dependent protein kinases (CDPK, CIPK). This triggers MAPK cascades and phosphorylation of transcription factors (Kosová et al., 2020; Medvedev, 2012).
ABA‑dependent pathway
Under cold, as under drought, the content of abscisic acid (ABA) may increase. ABA activates transcription factors with bZIP domains (AREB/ABF), which bind to ABRE elements in the promoters of cold‑regulated genes (Kosová et al., 2020; Li, 1994).
ABA‑independent pathway—the CBF/DREB system
This is the best‑studied and probably the main pathway for cold acclimation in temperate plants (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Kosová et al., 2020; Sharma & Dubey, 2020).
1. Upon cooling (usually at +4…+10 °C), genes encoding transcription factors CBF1, CBF2, CBF3 (C‑repeat Binding Factor, also called DREB1) are activated.
2. CBF proteins bind to the CRT/DRE element (CCGAC) in the promoters of so‑called COR genes (cold‑regulated).
3. Expression of dozens of COR genes is triggered, whose products participate in cold protection.
Important: the CBF pathway is induced not by ABA but directly by cold. However, there is cross‑regulation—some genes are activated through both CBF and ABA.
3.4 What physiological response occurs?
The response to cold includes both rapid (seconds–hours) and long‑term (days–weeks) changes.
Changes in fatty acid composition of membranes (desaturation)
Upon temperature decrease, desaturase enzymes are activated, which introduce double bonds into the fatty acid chains of membrane lipids (Li, 1994; Medvedev, 2012). This increases the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids, lowers the phase transition temperature, and restores membrane fluidity at low temperatures.
In cold‑tolerant plants, this process may take several days, but it is critically important for long‑term adaptation. Interestingly, in some species, desaturation is induced only during slow cooling (hardening) and does not occur upon rapid cooling.
Synthesis of cold‑regulated proteins (COR proteins)
COR proteins are a group of proteins encoded by COR genes (Kosová et al., 2020; Sharma & Dubey, 2020; Medvedev, 2012). These include:
1. LEA proteins and dehydrins—highly hydrophilic proteins that protect other proteins and membranes from dehydration damage. They contain many repeated glycine‑, alanine‑, and proline‑rich segments and can tightly bind water (Medvedev, 2012).
2. Antifreeze proteins (AFPs)—proteins that bind to ice crystals and inhibit their growth (Li, 1994; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). They accumulate in the apoplast, where extracellular ice formation occurs. Interestingly, many AFPs share structural similarity with pathogenesis‑related (PR) proteins—for example, chitinases and β‑1,3‑glucanases (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
3. Other stress proteins—chaperones (including some HSPs), antioxidant proteins, enzymes of osmolyte metabolism.
Accumulation of osmolytes and sugars
Under cold, as under drought, compatible osmolytes accumulate in cells, especially sucrose, raffinose, fructans, as well as proline and glycine betaine (Li, 1994; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012). Sugars have a dual role:
- Bind water, reducing the amount of free water available for ice formation;
- Stabilise membranes and proteins, acting as cryoprotectants.
In winter cereals, sucrose content in tissues can increase from 2–3% to 20–25% of dry mass during hardening (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Changes in hormone balance
Under cold, ABA and ethylene content increase, while auxin and gibberellin content decrease. This leads to growth inhibition—an adaptive response that redirects resources to hardening (Li, 1994; Medvedev, 2012).
Antioxidant defence
At low temperatures, especially in combination with high light (e.g., winter clear days), ROS formation increases. Superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase are activated (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012).
Special mechanisms under freezing
At negative temperatures, additional mechanisms are engaged:
1. Controlled extracellular dehydration. Cells lose water to the intercellular spaces, where it freezes. This allows avoidance of intracellular ice (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
2. Supercooling. Water in cells remains liquid at temperatures significantly below 0 °C (down to –40 °C in some woody species). This is achieved through high osmolyte concentration and absence of nucleation centres (Li, 1994; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
3. Vitrification (glass transition). At very low temperatures (below –40 °C), the cytoplasm can enter a glassy state—extremely viscous but not crystalline. This allows cells to survive extreme frost without ice formation (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
4. Suppression of intracellular ice. Plants prevent ice formation inside cells by maintaining high osmotic pressure and using antifreeze proteins and sugars.
3.5 What is the outcome of the response?
As in other cases, the outcome of cold stress depends on intensity, duration, and the plant's prior preparation.
Recovery
Upon return to optimal temperatures:
- Synthesis of COR proteins, desaturases, and antifreeze proteins ceases;
- Accumulated osmolytes are gradually consumed or incorporated into metabolism;
- Normal membrane composition is restored, but this may take several days (desaturation is reversible);
- Growth and photosynthesis resume.
In heat‑loving plants, brief cooling (e.g., night frosts) may allow rapid repair if the cooling did not cause irreversible damage.
Acclimation (cold hardening)
This is a key property of winter‑hardy plants. Cold hardening is a process that occurs in autumn with gradual temperature decrease and day shortening, and consists of two phases (Li, 1994; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016):
First phase (photoperiodic)—induced by short days, controlled by phytochrome. The plant enters dormancy, growth ceases. Frost resistance increases by 5–10 °C.
Second phase (actual low‑temperature)—induced by exposure to low positive temperatures (0…+5 °C). Expression of COR genes (CBF pathway) is triggered, sugars, dehydrins, antifreeze proteins accumulate, and membrane fatty acid composition changes. Frost resistance increases to the maximum level (e.g., in winter wheat from –5…–7 to –30…–35 °C) (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Important: hardening requires time and energy—slow cooling gives the plant time to prepare. Rapid cooling does not harden but damages.
Hardening and drought resistance. There is cross‑protection between cold and drought acclimation—many mechanisms are shared: accumulation of osmolytes, LEA proteins, antioxidants. Therefore, plants hardened to drought often become more frost‑resistant (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Li, 1994).
Damage
Under too severe or rapid cooling (or in the absence of hardening capacity, as in heat‑loving plants), irreversible damage occurs:
Under chilling stress (positive temperatures):
- Irreversible disruption of membrane structure (gel state, loss of semipermeability);
- Leakage of ions and metabolites;
- Inactivation of enzymes;
- Disruption of photosynthesis and respiration;
- Tissue necrosis (especially in heat‑loving species—maize, tomato, cucumber) (Medvedev, 2012; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Under freezing:
- Intracellular ice formation—mechanical destruction of organelle and plasma membranes;
- Irreversible dehydration—water loss leads to protein denaturation and membrane destruction, even if ice is extracellular (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016);
- Damage upon thawing—during rapid thawing, water from melting crystals can cause osmotic shock and cell rupture.
Key features of cold stress
1. Two fundamentally different types: chilling (0…+15 °C) and freezing (below 0 °C). Under freezing, the main damaging factor is ice, not temperature per se.
2. Primary target—membranes. Changes in lipid fluidity are the first signal and the first cause of damage.
3. Main regulatory pathway—CBF/DREB. This ABA‑independent pathway activates COR genes and is key for cold hardening.
4. Universal protective mechanisms: membrane desaturation, osmolyte accumulation (especially sugars), synthesis of LEA proteins/dehydrins, antifreeze proteins, activation of antioxidants.
5. Hardening—a gradual process requiring time and energy. Includes two phases (photoperiodic and low‑temperature). Reversible—upon warming, dehardening occurs.
6. Cross‑protection with drought—many mechanisms are shared (osmolytes, LEA proteins).
Key terms (for this section)
- Chilling stress — stress caused by low positive temperatures (0…+15 °C).
- Freezing stress — effect of negative temperatures.
- Phase transition of membrane lipids — transition from liquid‑crystalline to gel‑like state upon temperature decrease, disrupting membrane functions.
- Desaturation — introduction of double bonds into fatty acid chains of membrane lipids by desaturases to lower the phase transition temperature.
- Phase transition temperature — temperature at which the membrane transitions from liquid to solid state.
- COR genes — cold‑induced genes encoding protective proteins (LEA, dehydrins, antifreeze).
- CBF/DREB — transcription factors activated by cold and triggering COR gene expression.
- Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) — proteins that bind to ice crystals and inhibit their growth.
- LEA proteins and dehydrins — highly hydrophilic proteins protecting other proteins and membranes from dehydration.
- Cryoprotectants — substances (sugars, proline, proteins) that protect cells from damaging effects of low temperatures.
- Supercooling — state of liquid remaining liquid below its freezing point.
- Vitrification — transition of cytoplasm into a glassy state under extreme frost.
- Hardening — increase in frost resistance as a result of prior exposure to lowered temperatures (acclimation).
---
4. Salinity
Let us move on to the fourth model stress factor—salinity. This is one of the most severe and widespread stresses, especially in arid and semi‑arid regions. According to various estimates, saline soils occupy about 20–25% of irrigated lands, and this area continues to increase (Pessarakli & Szabolcs, 2020; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Salinity fundamentally differs from the previously considered factors in its two‑phase nature. This means that the plant faces not one but two sequential challenges of a different nature:
1. Osmotic phase—rapid (hours–days), associated with a decrease in the water potential of the soil solution;
2. Ionic phase—slow (days–weeks), associated with accumulation of toxic ions (Na⁺ and Cl⁻) in tissues.
Understanding this two‑phase nature is the key to the physiology of salt stress (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Lambers & Oliveira, 2019; Munns & Tester, 2008).
4.1 What is the primary disturbance? Two phases of salinity
Osmotic phase (rapid, first hours–days)
High salt concentration (primarily NaCl) in the soil solution lowers its water potential. By osmotic laws, water moves towards the lower water potential. If the soil solution has a lower Ψ_w than root cells, water begins to leave the roots into the soil (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
The primary disturbance is osmotic shock and loss of turgor. In terms of physiological effect, the osmotic phase of salinity is almost indistinguishable from drought: drop in water potential, stomatal closure, growth inhibition, osmolyte accumulation (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
However, unlike drought, where the problem is solved by restoring water supply, under salinity the osmotic phase merely precedes a more serious problem—ion toxicity.
Ionic phase (slow, days–weeks)
If the plant continues to be exposed to saline conditions, along with water, Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions begin to enter the roots. Unlike K⁺, Ca²⁺, and other macronutrients, sodium is not essential for most plants and does not perform specific biochemical functions (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
Accumulation of Na⁺ in the cytoplasm causes:
- Ion imbalance—disruption of the K⁺/Na⁺ ratio, critically important for the function of many enzymes;
- Toxicity—Na⁺ ions compete with K⁺ for binding sites on enzymes, leading to their inactivation;
- Disruption of protein synthesis—at high Na⁺ concentrations, the translation apparatus is affected (Sharma & Dubey, 2020);
- Disruption of photosynthesis—damage to chloroplasts and inhibition of enzymes (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Cl⁻ is also toxic, but its damaging effect is usually less pronounced than that of Na⁺ and varies more among species.
Thus, under salinity, both water status and ion homeostasis are disrupted simultaneously, and each of these factors requires its own adaptive mechanisms (Munns & Tester, 2008).
4.2 How does the plant perceive this?
Perception of the salt signal occurs through two parallel channels corresponding to the two phases of stress.
Perception of the osmotic phase
Similar to drought—via osmosensors and mechanosensitive channels. The drop in turgor and changes in membrane tension activate Ca²⁺ channels, causing calcium influx into the cytosol (Kosová et al., 2020; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). This signal triggers ABA synthesis (both in roots and leaves) and osmotic adaptation.
Perception of the ionic phase—the SOS system
The best‑studied mechanism for sensing excess Na⁺ is the SOS system (Salt Overly Sensitive), identified in Arabidopsis (Medvedev, 2012; Kosová et al., 2020; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
The system includes three key proteins:
1. SOS3—a calcium‑sensor protein containing three EF‑hands for Ca²⁺ binding. When cytosolic Na⁺ concentration rises, Ca²⁺ channels open, calcium binds to SOS3, causing conformational changes.
2. SOS2—a Ca²⁺‑dependent protein kinase (CIPK24). Activated SOS3 recruits SOS2 to the plasma membrane and activates it. SOS2 phosphorylates its target protein.
3. SOS1—a plasma membrane Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter. Phosphorylation of SOS1 activates it—it begins to pump Na⁺ out of the cell into the apoplast, using the energy of the proton gradient generated by the H⁺‑ATPase.
Physiological significance: the plant "senses" the rise in Na⁺ in the cytoplasm via the calcium signal and activates active sodium extrusion from the cell—the first level of defence against ion toxicity (Medvedev, 2012).
Other sensory mechanisms
Besides the SOS system, other mechanisms may participate in salinity perception:
- Receptor‑like kinases (RLK) sensitive to changes in ion composition;
- Aquaporins changing activity in response to osmotic shock;
- Changes in membrane potential—Na⁺ influx depolarises the membrane, which can serve as an additional signal (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
4.3 How is the signal transmitted?
The salt signal spreads through several interacting pathways, many of which are already familiar from other stresses.
Calcium signal and MAPK cascades
The Ca²⁺ wave initiated by osmotic and ionic stress activates calcium‑dependent protein kinases (CDPK) and the CBL‑CIPK system (including the SOS pathway). This, in turn, triggers MAPK cascades and phosphorylation of transcription factors (Kosová et al., 2020).
ABA‑dependent pathway
Under salinity, as under drought, ABA synthesis increases (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). ABA:
- Induces stomatal closure to limit transpiration and salt entry with the water flow;
- Activates expression of osmolyte genes;
- Promotes accumulation of LEA proteins and dehydrins (Sharma & Dubey, 2020).
ABA‑independent pathway
A number of salt‑regulated genes are activated without ABA involvement. In particular, genes encoding components of the SOS system (SOS1, SOS2, SOS3) are induced directly by Na⁺ via the calcium signal (Medvedev, 2012).
Systemic signals
Under salinity, roots generate signals transmitted to shoots:
- ABA is transported via the xylem;
- Xylem sap pH may change, affecting ABA distribution among compartments;
- Ionic signals—changes in K⁺, Ca²⁺, Na⁺ concentrations in xylem sap (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
4.4 What physiological response occurs?
The plant's response to salinity is multi‑level and includes strategies aimed at both osmotic adaptation (as under drought) and specific solutions to ion toxicity.
Strategy 1: Ion compartmentation into the vacuole
This is the main strategy for protecting the cytoplasm from toxic Na⁺ concentrations (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Lambers & Oliveira, 2019; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
On the tonoplast (vacuolar membrane), a vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter (NHX1) operates. It pumps Na⁺ into the vacuole using the energy of the proton gradient generated by:
- V‑ATPase (vacuolar ATPase);
- V‑PPase (vacuolar pyrophosphatase).
As a result, high Na⁺ concentrations (up to 200–500 mM) accumulate in the vacuole, while cytoplasmic levels remain relatively low (10–50 mM). To osmotically balance Na⁺ accumulation in the vacuole, compatible osmolytes are synthesised in the cytoplasm (see below).
In halophytes (plants adapted to salinity), this mechanism is particularly efficient—they can accumulate up to 1 M NaCl or more in vacuoles (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Strategy 2: Active ion extrusion from the cell
In parallel with vacuolar compartmentation, SOS1—a plasma membrane Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter—pumps Na⁺ out of the cell into the apoplast (Medvedev, 2012). This is effective for roots, where the apoplast is the soil solution or cell walls.
The combination of vacuolar accumulation and plasma membrane extrusion allows cytosolic Na⁺ concentration to be maintained at a safe level.
Strategy 3: Synthesis of compatible osmolytes
As under drought, under salinity, compatible osmolytes accumulate in the cytoplasm (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Lambers & Oliveira, 2019; Sharma & Dubey, 2020):
- Glycine betaine—the most effective osmoprotectant, especially in halophytes of the family Chenopodiaceae (beet, goosefoot, saltworts) (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006);
- Proline—a universal osmolyte synthesised by many plants;
- Sugars—sucrose, fructans, as well as sugar alcohols (sorbitol, mannitol) and cyclic polyols (pinitol).
Osmolyte synthesis is activated at the transcriptional level—genes encoding biosynthetic enzymes (e.g., P5CS for proline, BADH for glycine betaine) are induced. Osmolyte accumulation serves two functions:
- Osmotic—lowering cytoplasmic water potential to balance vacuolar pressure;
- Protective—stabilising proteins and membranes under osmotic and ionic stress.
Strategy 4: Structural protection—salt glands and salt bladders
Halophytes possess specialised structures for removing excess salt from the organism (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016):
1. Salt glands—multicellular structures that actively secrete NaCl onto the leaf surface (e.g., in tamarisk, some grasses). Salt crystallises on the surface and is later washed off by rain or blown away.
2. Salt bladders (bladder hairs)—specialised trichomes that accumulate salt (e.g., in some Chenopodiaceae—goosefoot, saltwort). When fully filled, the bladder dies and falls off, removing salt from the plant.
3. Salt secretion by roots—some plants can excrete excess salt back into the soil through roots.
Strategy 5: Limiting ion transport to shoots
Roots regulate ion entry into the xylem:
- Na⁺ is retained in root cortex cells;
- Na⁺ can be re‑excreted from the xylem back into the cortex (or into the soil);
- Minimal Na⁺ enters the xylem vessels (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019; Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
In some plants, salts accumulate in old leaves, which then abscise—an additional mechanism for removing toxic ions.
Strategy 6: Stomatal closure
As under drought, under salinity, stomata close under the influence of ABA. This:
- Limits transpiration and water loss;
- Reduces salt entry with the water flow into shoots (Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
However, stomatal closure simultaneously reduces CO₂ uptake and photosynthesis—this is the "cost" of protection.
Strategy 7: Antioxidant defence
Under salinity, as under other stresses, ROS formation is activated. Enzymatic (SOD, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase) and non‑enzymatic (ascorbate, glutathione, tocopherols) antioxidant systems are engaged (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012).
Gene expression regulation
Under salinity, transcription of a wide range of genes is activated, encoding:
- Ion transporters (SOS1, NHX1, HKT1);
- Osmolyte synthesis enzymes (P5CS, BADH);
- LEA proteins and dehydrins;
- Antioxidant enzymes;
- Aquaporins (regulation of water permeability);
- ABA metabolism enzymes (Sharma & Dubey, 2020; Kosová et al., 2020; Medvedev, 2012).
4.5 What is the outcome of the response?
The outcome of salt stress depends on the intensity of salinisation, its duration, and the plant's ability to acclimate.
Recovery
If salinisation ceases (e.g., salts leached from soil by irrigation water), the plant can recover:
- Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions are washed out from tissues or redistributed;
- Osmolyte and stress protein synthesis ceases;
- Normal ion ratios are restored;
- Growth and photosynthesis resume.
However, full recovery may take several days, especially after severe ionic stress.
Acclimation (increase in salt tolerance)
Under prolonged or repeated salinisation, the plant can acclimate:
- Efficiency of the SOS system and NHX transporters increases;
- Basal level of osmolytes (proline, glycine betaine) rises;
- Membrane lipid composition changes (increase in unsaturated fatty acids);
- Antioxidant defence is activated;
- Leaves develop xeromorphic traits—thicker cuticle, smaller cells (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
In some halophytes, acclimation can lead to induction of CAM photosynthesis—a shift from C3 to crassulacean acid metabolism, allowing water conservation under osmotic stress (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Damage
At too high salt concentrations (or in the absence of genetic adaptation capacity), irreversible damage occurs:
1. Irreversible ion imbalance—disruption of K⁺/Na⁺ ratio leads to inactivation of key enzymes (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006);
2. Protein degradation—high Na⁺ concentrations cause protein denaturation and aggregation (Sharma & Dubey, 2020);
3. Oxidative damage—lipid peroxidation of membranes, damage to chloroplasts and mitochondria;
4. Tissue necrosis—especially in old leaves where salts accumulate;
5. Plant death.
Cost of adaptation under salinity is particularly high: energy spent on osmolyte synthesis, ion pump operation, and stress proteins reduces productivity. Even moderate salinity in glycophytes can lead to significant yield losses (Munns & Tester, 2008; Lambers & Oliveira, 2019).
Key features of salinity
1. Two‑phase nature—key characteristic: osmotic phase (similar to drought) and ionic phase (specific to salts, associated with Na⁺ and Cl⁻ accumulation).
2. Two parallel threats: water deficit and ion toxicity—require two different sets of adaptive mechanisms.
3. Central role of the SOS system—signalling pathway for sensing excess Na⁺ via calcium signal and activation of Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters.
4. Two main strategies for Na⁺ protection: vacuolar compartmentation (NHX1) and extrusion from the cell (SOS1).
5. Osmolytes—as under drought, but under salinity, glycine betaine acquires special importance, especially in halophytes.
6. Specialised structures of halophytes: salt glands and salt bladders for active removal of excess salts.
7. Cross‑protection with drought—many mechanisms (osmolytes, LEA proteins, stomatal closure) are shared.
8. Glycophytes vs. halophytes—fundamental difference in strategies: glycophytes mainly try to exclude salt; halophytes accumulate it in vacuoles and actively remove it via specialised structures.
Comparison with other stresses (brief)
| Parameter | Drought | Heat | Cold | Salinity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary signal | Decrease in Ψ_w | Change in membrane fluidity | Lipid phase transition | Osmotic + ionic stress |
| Main second messenger | Ca²⁺, ABA | Ca²⁺, HSF | Ca²⁺, CBF | Ca²⁺, ABA, SOS |
| Key hormone | ABA | (ABA minor) | ABA (partially) | ABA |
| Specific mechanisms | Stomata, osmolytes | Heat shock proteins | Desaturation, antifreeze | SOS system, NHX1, salt glands |
| Cost of adaptation | Reduced growth and yield | Translational block, HSP costs | Hardening costs | Energy for ion pumps and osmolytes |
Key terms (for this section)
- Salinity — stress caused by excessive salt concentration in soil or water.
- Glycophyte — a plant sensitive to salinity (non‑salt‑tolerant).
- Halophyte — a plant adapted to salinity (salt‑tolerant).
- Osmotic phase — initial stage of salt stress, associated with decreased water potential.
- Ionic phase — secondary stage of salt stress, associated with accumulation of toxic Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions.
- SOS system (Salt Overly Sensitive) — signalling pathway including sensor SOS3, kinase SOS2, and antiporter SOS1, ensuring Na⁺ extrusion from the cell.
- NHX1 — vacuolar \mathrm{Na+/H+} antiporter pumping Na⁺ into the vacuole.
- Compatible osmolytes — non‑toxic organic compounds (glycine betaine, proline, sugars) accumulated for osmotic regulation.
- Glycine betaine — the most important osmoprotectant, especially characteristic of halophytes.
- Salt glands — specialised structures for secreting salts onto the leaf surface in halophytes.
- Salt bladders — trichomes that accumulate salt and then die off.
---
5. Hypoxia
The final model stress factor is hypoxia, or oxygen deficiency. In natural conditions, this stress occurs during flooding (waterlogging), waterlogging, and also when an ice crust forms in winter, preventing gas exchange (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006; Medvedev, 2012).
Hypoxia fundamentally differs from all previously considered factors. While drought, heat, cold, and salinity act on the plant from the outside, causing dehydration, denaturation, or ion imbalance, hypoxia affects the internal energy system of the cell. Without oxygen, mitochondria cannot produce ATP via oxidative phosphorylation, and the cell faces the threat of energy starvation (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012).
5.1 What is the primary disturbance?
Oxygen deficit in the root zone
When soil is flooded, water fills the pore space, displacing air. The diffusion coefficient of oxygen in water is about 10⁴ times lower than in air. Plant roots, soil microorganisms, and animals rapidly consume available oxygen, and its concentration in the soil solution drops to critical levels (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
The primary disturbance is cessation of oxygen access to root cell mitochondria. In the absence of the final electron acceptor (O₂), the respiratory electron transport chain stops, and:
1. The Krebs cycle ceases (requires NAD⁺, which is not regenerated);
2. Oxidative phosphorylation is blocked;
3. ATP synthesis in mitochondria stops.
The only source of ATP remains glycolysis, which under anaerobic conditions yields only 2 molecules of ATP per glucose (compared to 36–38 under aerobic respiration) (Medvedev, 2012).
Energy crisis
The decline in ATP level is the most rapid and critical disturbance under hypoxia. Without ATP, the following are impossible:
- Active transport across membranes (H⁺‑ATPases);
- Synthesis of proteins, nucleic acids, lipids;
- Maintenance of ion homeostasis;
- Growth processes.
Accumulation of toxic products—acidosis
Under anaerobic conditions, glycolysis produces pyruvate, which is not oxidised in the Krebs cycle but is reduced. Depending on the type of fermentation:
- Lactic acid fermentation (activated by lactate dehydrogenase, LDH) yields lactic acid.
- Alcoholic fermentation (activated by pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase, ADH) yields ethanol.
Accumulation of lactic acid causes acidosis—a drop in cytoplasmic pH from normal 7.4 to 6.8 and below. Acidosis damages enzymes, membranes, and protein synthesis (Medvedev, 2012). Therefore, hypoxia‑tolerant species quickly switch from lactic to alcoholic fermentation—ethanol diffuses out of cells and does not cause acidification.
Thus, under hypoxia, three interrelated parameters are disturbed simultaneously: ATP level, redox balance (NADH/NAD⁺), and cytoplasmic pH.
5.2 How does the plant perceive this?
Perception of oxygen deficiency in plants is less studied than in animals, but key mechanisms have been identified.
Haemoglobins as oxygen sensors
Plants possess haemoglobins—haem‑containing proteins capable of binding O₂. They are thought to act as sensors responding to decreased oxygen concentration (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006; Medvedev, 2012).
Haemoglobins can:
- Bind O₂ with high affinity;
- Change conformation depending on pO₂;
- Transmit signals through interaction with other proteins.
Changes in redox state of the respiratory chain
Upon arrest of the electron transport chain, reduced carriers (NADH, ubiquinone, cytochromes) accumulate. Changes in the redox status of the cell serve as an important signal perceived by redox‑sensitive proteins that influence gene expression (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Kosová et al., 2020).
Calcium signal
Under anoxia, a rapid influx of Ca²⁺ into the cytosol is observed. Possible calcium sources include mitochondria (where electron transport chain function is disrupted) and the extracellular space through plasma membrane channels (Medvedev, 2012). Within minutes after the onset of anoxia, an increase in [Ca²⁺]cyt and a rise in alcohol dehydrogenase mRNA levels are recorded (Medvedev, 2012).
Energy status—ATP/ADP ratio
The drop in ATP and rise in ADP/AMP are direct signals of energy crisis. These changes affect regulation of metabolic pathways and gene expression, although the mechanisms of direct transduction of this signal are not yet fully elucidated (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
5.3 How is the signal transmitted?
The hypoxia signal spreads through several pathways linking perception in roots to systemic responses in the whole plant.
Calcium signal and MAPK cascades
The Ca²⁺ influx activates calcium‑binding proteins and protein kinases, which in turn trigger MAPK cascades. This leads to phosphorylation of transcription factors regulating the expression of anaerobic response genes (Kosová et al., 2020; Medvedev, 2012).
Ethylene as a systemic signal
Under root hypoxia, synthesis of 1‑aminocyclopropane‑1‑carboxylic acid (ACC)—the immediate precursor of ethylene—is activated (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016). ACC is transported via xylem from roots to shoots, where it is converted to ethylene by ACC oxidase (which requires oxygen).
Ethylene, reaching the shoots, causes:
- Epinasty—downward bending of leaves and petioles, characteristic of many species under flooding;
- Induction of aerenchyma formation;
- Other adaptive responses (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012).
ABA under hypoxia
Under flooding, ABA content may also increase, causing stomatal closure and reduced transpiration (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006). This limits water loss but may also exacerbate the energy crisis.
5.4 What physiological response occurs?
The plant's response to hypoxia is multi‑level and includes metabolic reorganisation, changes in gene expression, and morphological adaptations.
Switch to anaerobic metabolism
The main metabolic response is the transition from aerobic respiration to glycolysis and fermentation (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
1. Glycolysis—breakdown of glucose to pyruvate yielding 2 ATP and 2 NADH.
2. Alcoholic fermentation—reduction of pyruvate to ethanol involving pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH):
Pyruvate → acetaldehyde + CO₂ (PDC)
Acetaldehyde + NADH + H⁺ → ethanol + NAD⁺ (ADH)
This reaction regenerates NAD⁺, which is required for glycolysis to continue, and does not acidify the cell.
3. Lactic acid fermentation (in early stages)—reduction of pyruvate to lactate by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). However, lactate accumulation causes acidosis, so in tolerant species a rapid switch to alcoholic fermentation occurs.
Synthesis of anoxia proteins
Under anoxia, synthesis of most "normal" proteins is suppressed, but synthesis of about 20 specific polypeptides—anoxia proteins—is activated (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006; Medvedev, 2012). These are mainly:
- Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)—key enzyme of alcoholic fermentation;
- Pyruvate decarboxylase;
- Glucose phosphate isomerase;
- Glyceraldehyde‑3‑phosphate dehydrogenase (glycolytic enzyme);
- Enolase (glycolytic enzyme);
- Sucrose synthase—provides substrates for glycolysis from sucrose;
- α‑Amylase—hydrolyses starch to glucose.
These proteins are considered isoforms of enzymes optimised for anaerobic conditions (increased stability at low pH, high activity at low ATP).
Formation of aerenchyma
Under prolonged hypoxia, tolerant species form aerenchyma—tissue with large intercellular spaces (air cavities) that facilitate oxygen transport from the shoot to the roots (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
The process involves programmed cell death (apoptosis):
1. Under the influence of ethylene, a death programme is activated in root cortex cells;
2. Cell walls and contents are degraded;
3. Cells collapse, forming cavities;
4. Cavities coalesce into continuous air channels.
Aerenchyma not only serves for oxygen transport but also reduces tissue density, facilitating growth in water.
Root growth towards oxygen
Under hypoxia, roots may exhibit aerotropism—growth towards zones with higher oxygen content. Enhanced root growth deeper into the soil, where aeration may be better, is also observed (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006). This process depends on assimilate availability.
Reduction of energy‑consuming processes
To save ATP under energy crisis, the plant:
- Inhibits growth (cell division and expansion);
- Reduces protein and nucleic acid synthesis;
- Decreases activity of pumps and transporters.
Antioxidant defence
Under hypoxia, as under other stresses, ROS formation is activated, especially upon oxygen return (reoxygenation). Antioxidant systems—SOD, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase—are engaged (Medvedev, 2012; Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
Adaptations of aquatic plants
In permanently aquatic plants (e.g., water lilies), aerenchyma is constitutive. In many aquatic species, flooding stimulates intense growth of petioles and internodes to bring leaves to the surface for air access. This process is controlled by ethylene and can be very rapid—in some species, daily increments reach several centimetres (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016).
5.5 What is the outcome of the response?
The outcome of hypoxic stress depends on the species' capacity for anaerobic adaptation, duration of flooding, and temperature (at higher temperatures, oxygen is consumed faster).
Recovery
Upon return to normal soil aeration:
- Anaerobic metabolism is switched off;
- Synthesis of ADH and other fermentation enzymes ceases; accumulated proteins degrade;
- Mitochondrial function and oxidative phosphorylation are restored;
- Cytoplasmic pH normalises;
- Growth resumes.
However, recovery may be accompanied by oxidative stress upon sudden oxygen return (reoxygenation)—ROS formation can damage tissues weakened by prolonged hypoxia (Schopfer & Brennicke, 2016; Medvedev, 2012).
Acclimation
In hypoxia‑tolerant species (rice, many aquatic and wetland plants, willow), during prolonged flooding, the following develop:
- Well‑developed aerenchyma;
- Efficient oxygen transport system (including barriers against O₂ leakage from roots into soil);
- High activity of glycolytic and fermentative enzymes;
- Mechanisms to prevent acidosis (switch to alcoholic fermentation, active lactate excretion) (Medvedev, 2012);
- Increased resistance to reoxygenation stress (activation of antioxidant defence).
Example: rice can grow at depths of 50 cm or more thanks to well‑developed aerenchyma and the ability for rapid internode elongation under flooding (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006).
Damage
In intolerant species (most mesophytes—maize, bean, tomato, wheat), prolonged hypoxia leads to irreversible damage:
1. Irreversible acidosis—cytoplasmic pH drops below critical levels, denaturing enzymes and membrane proteins;
2. ATP depletion—glycolysis cannot sustain necessary ATP levels; energy starvation leads to structural breakdown;
3. Membrane disruption—loss of barrier function, leakage of ions and metabolites;
4. Root death—especially the absorption zone (root hairs), halting water and mineral uptake (Kuznetsov & Dmitrieva, 2006);
5. Shoot death due to water and mineral deficiency, as well as anaerobic processes in roots.
Key features of hypoxia
1. Energy crisis—the primary disturbance under hypoxia, associated with cessation of oxidative phosphorylation and a sharp drop in ATP synthesis.
2. Two types of fermentation—lactic (leads to acidosis, typical of early stages) and alcoholic (preferable because ethanol is removed from the cell).
3. Anoxia proteins—enzymes of glycolysis and fermentation synthesised instead of most "normal" proteins under anoxia.
4. Ethylene as a systemic signal—triggers aerenchyma formation, epinasty, and other adaptive responses.
5. Aerenchyma—key morphological adaptation ensuring oxygen transport from shoots to roots.
6. Cross‑protection—some mechanisms are shared with drought (stomatal closure via ABA, osmolyte accumulation).
7. Reoxygenation stress—a particular danger upon oxygen return, associated with ROS formation.
Comparative table: five model stresses
| Parameter | Drought | Heat | Cold | Salinity | Hypoxia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary physical signal | Decrease in Ψ_w , loss of turgor | Protein denaturation, change in membrane fluidity | Lipid phase transition (gelation) | Osmotic + ionic stress | O₂ deficiency, ATP drop |
| Main damaging factor | Dehydration | Protein denaturation, ROS | Membrane disruption, ice (freezing) | Osmotic + ionic imbalance | Energy crisis, acidosis |
| Sensors | Osmosensors, mechano‑channels | Changes in membrane fluidity, HSF | Membrane sensors, COLD1 | SOS3 (calcium sensor) | Haemoglobins, redox sensors |
| Main second messenger | Ca²⁺, ABA | Ca²⁺, HSF | Ca²⁺, CBF | Ca²⁺, ABA, SOS | Ca²⁺, ethylene, redox signals |
| Key regulatory pathway | ABA‑dependent | HSF → HSP | CBF → COR genes | SOS system + NHX1 | Ethylene → aerenchyma, fermentation enzymes |
| Main protective proteins | LEA, dehydrins | HSP (chaperones) | COR, LEA, antifreeze | SOS1, NHX1, osmolytes | ADH, PDC, glycolytic enzymes |
| Osmolytes | Proline, sugars, betaine | — | Sugars, proline, betaine | Glycine betaine, proline, sugars | — |
| Specific structures | — | — | — | Salt glands (in halophytes) | Aerenchyma |
| Cost of adaptation | Reduced growth | Translational block, HSP costs | Hardening energy costs | Energy for ion pumps | Switch to inefficient metabolism |
| Cross‑protection | With salinity, cold | With drought | With drought | With drought | With drought (ABA) |
---
Conclusion
We have examined five key model stress factors and have seen that, despite the different physical and chemical natures of these impacts, the plant's physiological response follows the same logical scheme:
Universal scheme of stress response
1. Disturbance—a physical or chemical parameter goes beyond the normal range (water potential, temperature, ion concentration, oxygen availability).
2. Perception—via specialised sensors (osmosensors, thermosensors, ion sensors, redox sensors, haemoglobins).
3. Signal transduction—through universal signalling systems:
- Calcium waves (Ca²⁺);
- MAPK cascades;
- Reactive oxygen species (ROS);
- Phytohormones (ABA, ethylene, jasmonates).
4. Response—changes in gene expression and synthesis of protective proteins:
- Chaperones (HSP under heat, COR under cold);
- Osmolytes (under drought and salinity);
- Enzymes (fermentation under hypoxia, antioxidants under all stresses);
- Structural changes (aerenchyma, salt glands).
5. Outcome—one of three:
- Recovery (under short‑term and mild stress);
- Acclimation (under prolonged or repeated exposure—hardening, increased resistance);
- Damage (under too severe or prolonged impact, when protective mechanisms are exhausted).
Main conclusions
1. Unity of stress response. All stresses activate common signalling pathways and protective mechanisms. This explains cross‑protection—hardening to one factor increases resistance to others.
2. Specificity of response. Each stress has its own "signature" mechanisms: HSP under heat, CBF pathway under cold, SOS system under salinity, aerenchyma under hypoxia.
3. Cost of adaptation. All protective mechanisms require energy and resource expenditure, so under stress conditions growth and productivity are always reduced. This is a fundamental trade‑off between survival and biomass production.
4. Time is the most important factor. Slow development of stress allows the plant to acclimate; rapid development leads to damage. This has enormous practical significance for agronomy: gradual hardening, pre‑sowing treatments, management of stress factors.
5. Evolutionary significance. The ability for stress response is the result of long evolution under constant environmental fluctuations. It determines species distribution ranges and their competitiveness in different ecosystems.
In the next lecture, we will examine in detail the general mechanisms of stress response—signalling pathways, regulatory networks, the role of phytohormones and second messengers, and we will also focus more specifically on particular protective proteins and their functions in the cell.
Key terms (for the Hypoxia section)
- Hypoxia — partial oxygen deficiency in the environment.
- Anoxia — complete absence of oxygen.
- Aerobic respiration — ATP production with oxygen involvement in mitochondria.
- Anaerobic metabolism — energy provision without oxygen (glycolysis + fermentation).
- Alcoholic fermentation — reduction of pyruvate to ethanol with NAD⁺ regeneration.
- Lactic acid fermentation — reduction of pyruvate to lactate with NAD⁺ regeneration (leads to acidosis).
- Acidosis — decrease in cytoplasmic pH due to accumulation of organic acids (lactate, acetate).
- Anoxia proteins — polypeptides (mainly glycolytic and fermentative enzymes) synthesised under oxygen deficiency instead of most normal proteins.
- Aerenchyma — tissue with large intercellular spaces providing gas exchange and oxygen transport to roots.
- Programmed cell death (apoptosis) — genetically regulated cell death process involved in aerenchyma formation.
- Reoxygenation — return of oxygen to tissues subjected to hypoxia, accompanied by oxidative stress.
- Ethylene — phytohormone inducing epinasty, aerenchyma formation, and other adaptive responses under hypoxia.
- ACC (1‑aminocyclopropane‑1‑carboxylic acid) — ethylene precursor transported from roots to shoots under flooding.
References
- Chapman, C., Huang, B. (2019). ‘Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Post-Drought Stress Recovery in Grass Species’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 41-49.
- George, E., Horst, W.J., Neumann, E. (2012). ‘Adaptation of Plants to Adverse Chemical Soil Conditions’, in Marschner's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. : Elsevier, 409-472.
- Hopkins, W.G., Hüner, N.P..A. (2009). ‘Acclimation to Environmental Stress’, in Introduction to Plant Physiology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 241-260.
- Hopkins, W.G., Hüner, N.P..A. (2009). ‘Responses of Plants to Environmental Stress’, in Introduction to Plant Physiology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 223-240.
- Islam, M.A., Nilahyane, A. (2019). ‘Water Stress Effects on Growth and Physiology of Corn’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 695-702.
- Kordrostami, M., Rabiei, B. (2019). ‘Breeding for Improved Crop Resistance to Osmotic Stress’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 593-602.
- Kosová, K., Urban, M.Oldřich., Vítámvás, P., Prášil, I.Tom. (2019). ‘Plant Abiotic Stress Proteomics’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 207-230.
- Lambers, H., Oliveira, R.S. (2019). ‘Mineral Nutrition’, in Plant Physiological Ecology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 301-384.
- Lambers, H., Oliveira, R.S. (2019). ‘Plant Energy Budgets: Effects of Radiation and Temperature’, in Plant Physiological Ecology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 279-290.
- Lambers, H., Oliveira, R.S. (2019). ‘Plant Water Relations’, in Plant Physiological Ecology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 187-263.
- Li, P.H. (1994). ‘Crop Plant Cold Hardiness’, in Boote, K.J., Bennett, J.M., Sinclair, T.R., Paulsen, G.M. (ed.) Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield. Florida, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, pp. 395-416.
- Meimandi, M.Mozafarian., Kappel, N., Pessarakli, M. (2019). ‘Effects of Salinity Stress on Tomato Plants and the Possibility of Its Mitigation’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 689-694.
- Nakamoto, H., Akter, T. (2019). ‘Molecular Chaperones and Acquisition of Thermotolerance in Plants’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 343-359.
- Nguyen, H.T. (1994). ‘Genetic and Molecular Aspects of High Temperature Stress Responses’, in Boote, K.J., Bennett, J.M., Sinclair, T.R., Paulsen, G.M. (ed.) Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield. Florida, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, pp. 391-394.
- Pessarakli, M., Szabolcs, I. (2019). ‘Soil Salinity and Sodicity as Particular Plant/Crop Stress Factors’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 3-21.
- Prasad, R.Nutan., Prasad, S.Birendra., Benjamín, R. (2019). ‘Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Submerged Aquatic Macrophytes’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 65-83.
- Savin, R., Slafer, G.A., Cossani, C.M., Abeledo, L.G., Sadras, V.O. (2015). ‘Cereal yield in Mediterranean-type environments: challenging the paradigms on terminal drought, the adaptability of barley vs wheat and the role of nitrogen fertilization’, in Crop Physiology. : Elsevier, 141-158.
- Schopfer, P., Brennicke, A. (2010). ‘Stress und Stressresistenz’, in Pflanzenphysiologie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 583-616.
- Sharma, P., Dubey, R.S. (2019). ‘Protein Synthesis by Plants Under Stressful Conditions’, in Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress, Fourth Edition. Fourth edition. | Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 405-449.
- Кузнецов, В.В. (2006). ‘Адаптация и устойчивость растений к неблагоприятным факторам среды [Adaptation and resistance of plants to unfavorable environmental factors]’, in Физиология растений [Physiology of plants]. Москва: Высшая школа, pp. 618-717.
- Медведев, С.С. (2012). ‘Физиология стресса [Physiology of stress]’, in Физиология растений [Physiology of plants]. Санкт-Петербург: БХВ-Петербург, pp. 415-430.